Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB
..... (paragraph 24 of the judgment), the court could not exercise dispensing powers to waive non-compliance. the court relied upon sections 31, 83(l)(c) and 86 of the representation of the people act, 1951 read with rule 94- a of the rules there under to hold that non-compliance of the said provisions would leave the court with no option except ..... claims of the complete specification no.184038 are not invention within the meaning of the act? (vii)whether the petitioner proves that the patent was obtained on false suggestion or representation as alleged? (viii)whether the petitioner proves that the 1st respondent has failed to disclose to the controller the information required by section 8 or has furnished information, which in .....
Tag this Judgment!