Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: representation of the people act 1951 chapter i nomination of candidates Sorted by: recent Court: supreme court of india Year: 2011 Page 1 of about 3 results (0.144 seconds)

Ramesh Rout Vs. Rabindra Nath Rout

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2012(1)KLT21(SN); 2012(1)SCC762; 2012(1)SCJ567; AIR2012SCW297; AIR2012SC329

..... from 89-athagarh assembly constituency has been set aside by the high court of orissa has preferred these two appeals under section 116a read with section 116c of the representation of the people act, 1951 (for short, `the 1951 act').2. the election commission of india (for short, `commission') in order to constitute 14th legislative assembly announced general elections in the state ..... candidate is not to be lightly interfered with, one of the essentials of that law is also to safeguard the purity of the election process and also to see that people do not get elected by flagrant breaches of that law or by corrupt practices. in cases where the election law does not prescribe the consequence or does not lay down .....

Afjal Imam. Vs. State of Bihar and Others.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... .) was dealing with a matter concerning the election to the legislative assembly of the then state of madras held in the year 1957. in this case arising under the representation of the people act, 1951, the supreme court held that if the returning officer had rejected a nomination paper of a candidate on one disqualification, it was open for the election tribunal .....

Sri Radhy Shyam (Dead) Through L.Rs. and Others. Vs. State of Uttar Pr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... that the provisions of section 5a of the said act, shall not apply."4. since the appellants' land was also included in the notification, they made a representation to the chairman-cum-chief executive officer of the development authority (respondent no.4) with copies to the chief minister, principal secretary, housing and urban development, ..... it must be remembered that compulsory taking of one's property is a serious matter. if the property belongs to economically disadvantaged segment of the society or people suffering from other handicaps, then the court is not only entitled but is duty bound to scrutinize the action/decision of the state with greater vigilance, ..... executive authorities i.e. the inflow of funds in the state in the form of investment by private entrepreneurs and availability of larger employment opportunities to the people of the area. however, we do not find any plausible reason to accept this tailor-made justification for approving the impugned action which has resulted in .....