Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Jul-16-2003
Reported in : RLW2004(1)Raj417; 2004(1)WLC11
..... panigrahi and ors. (19), it was held that order 14 rule 2 of the code is applicable to the election petition. there is no provision in the representation of people act, 1951 which is inconsistent with the provisions of order 14 rule 2 of the code, which contemplate that the judgment in election petition should, therefore, be ..... ors. (18), the allahabad high court held that the provisions of order 14 rule 2 of the code, none the less apply to the proceedings under the representation of people act, 1951. it was further held that judgment has got to be pronounced on all issues under order 14 rule 2 of the code simultaneously. it will ..... those six doubtful votes were not examined by the election tribunal on the ground that the returned candidate has not filed recrimination as envisaged under section 97 of the representation of people act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as 'the r.p. act, 1951') and declared the election of the returned candidate as void and consequently election petitioner was .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Apr-29-2003
Reported in : RLW2003(3)Raj1409; 2003(3)WLC481
..... under articles 190(3) and 191(1), his election for such a disqualification is not liable to be challenged under article 329(b) read with section 5 of the representation of people act, 1951. thus, it follows that disqualifications covered by articles 190(3) and 191(1) do not fall within the scope of article 329 of the constitution. ..... arose as to whether or not the respondent was disqualified to be elected as a member of the legislative assembly since he had incurred disqualification under the representation of the people act as five years had not elapsed from the date of his release when he stood for elections. the matter was referred by the speaker of the ..... supreme court that the term 'election' as occurring in article 329 connotes the entire process of election form the issue of the notification under section 14 of the representation of people act, 1951 to the declaration of the result under section 66 of the act.18. the aforesaid decision of the supreme court in ashok kumar's case ( .....
Tag this Judgment!