Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
..... polled. the challenge raised by petitioner to the election of respondent no.1 is mainly based on corrupt practice within the meaning of section 123 of the representation of people act, 1951. 3 respondent no.1 has presented written statement and has controverted the contentions raised by petitioner in the election petition. in the written statement ..... (j) there is no pleading in respect of date and place of the publications as well as particulars of the publications. 13 section 80 of the representation of the people act, 1951, provides that no election shall be called in question except by an election petition presented in accordance with provisions of this chapter (chapter ii ..... publications and whether the publications are prior to presentation of nomination paper by respondent no.1 or thereafter. in view of section 79(b) of the representation of the people act, candidate means a person who has been or claims to have been duly nominated as a candidate at any election. respondent no.1 shall .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
..... polled. the challenge raised by petitioner to the election of respondent no.1 is mainly based on corrupt practice within the meaning of section 123 of the representation of people act, 1951. 3 respondent no.1 has presented written statement and has controverted the contentions raised by petitioner in the election petition. in the written statement ..... (j) there is no pleading in respect of date and place of the publications as well as particulars of the publications. 13 section 80 of the representation of the people act, 1951, provides that no election shall be called in question except by an election petition presented in accordance with provisions of this chapter (chapter ii ..... publications and whether the publications are prior to presentation of nomination paper by respondent no.1 or thereafter. in view of section 79(b) of the representation of the people act, candidate means a person who has been or claims to have been duly nominated as a candidate at any election. respondent no.1 shall .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
..... whether the election petition is maintainable, as it does not contain concise statement of material facts on which the petitioner relies as contemplated by the provisions of the representation of peoples act, 1951? 8. opportunity was given to the petitioner to file reply to the aforesaid application of respondent no.1 and opportunity was given even to show the ..... . on this ground, prayer was made to set aside the election of respondent no.1 under the grounds given in section 100 (1) (d) (iv) of the representation of the people act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act' for short). 7. respondent no.1 has filed written statement. on the basis of pleadings, issues are already framed. ..... no.1 has raised following points. 1) whether the election petition is maintainable as it does not contain any of the ground contemplated under section 100 of representation of peoples act, 1951? 2) whether the election petition suffers on the count of non compliance of provisions of sections 81, 82 and 83 of .....
Tag this Judgment!