Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Oct-29-2003
Reported in : 2004(1)ALD181
..... of this court in sangram singh v. election tribunal, kotah, : [1955]2scr1 . there the court had to consider the effect of section 105 of the representation of the people act, 1951 (act xljii of 1951) which provided that 'every order of the tribunal made under this act shall be final and conclusive'. the contention there ..... followed the procedure prescribed under the act, particularly that referred to in section 9(2) and determined the question of allotment of reserved seats after hearing public representations and objections, its act cannot be called in question in a court of law. in mastanaiah's case (supra), the appellant challenged the notification of the ..... challenged, and that authority has followed the procedure prescribed, particularly that referred to under section 9(2) of the said act and having heard the public representations and objections, determined the question, its acts cannot be called in question unless it can be said that it has not taken into consideration the factors .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : May-02-2003
Reported in : 2003(4)ALD138
..... does not belong to scheduled tribe community ?4. whether the result of the first respondent was declared without following the provisions contained in sections 65 and 100 of representation of peoples act ?5. whether the petition is not maintainable as contended by the first respondent?6. to what relief?since the above issues can conveniently be recast, i ..... scheduled tribe candidate ?2. to what relief ?6. since the three election petitions are in respect of the same election, as contemplated by section 112 of the representation of people act, 1951 (the act) they were clubbed and evidence was recorded in e.p. no. 25 of 1999.7. on behalf of petitioners pws.1 to 11 ..... petitioner in ep no. 25 of 1999, is that first respondent does not belong to scheduled tribe community and that he sent the original exs-a1 and a2 representations to the election commissioner and chief justice of india. during cross-examination he stated that he was elected as mla from the same constituency, which is being reserved .....
Tag this Judgment!