Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: representation of the people act 1951 chapter i corrupt partices Page 25 of about 670 results (0.135 seconds)

Mukhtiar Singh Vs. Shri Bal Mukand and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1994P& H192

..... not choose to contest this petition. in this first preliminary objection raised in the written statement, allegations of corrupt practice within the meaning of sec. 123(7) of the representation of the people act (hereinafter referred to as the act) have been assailed. it has been alleged that the petition was not accompanied by an affidavit in support of the allegation of ..... under a very tense atmosphere. some of the organisations had given a call for boycotting the poll and because of the threats given by the terrorists/ militants, most of the people did not come forward to cast their votes; that the situation prevailing in the state of punjab was exploited by congress (i) by pressurising the officials of the administration to .....

Dudhnath Prasad Vs. Mulchand and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1958All7

..... these provisions of the representation of the people act came uplor consideration before the supreme court in durga shankar mehta v. raghuraj singh : [1955]1scr267 (d). mukherjea j., speaking for the court overruled ..... the election shall bedeclared to be void';this provision is similar to section 12-c (1) (b) (ii) of the act. section 36 of the representation of the people act deals with scrutiny of nomina-tions and contains provisions similar to those of rule 18-c, but with this material difference that it provides for summary enquiry. ..... person who is disqualified under section 5-a ought not to be in the register.14. the words 'the improper acceptance or rejection of any nomination' are used in the representation of the people act (no. xliii of 1951). section 100 (1) (c) is in exactly the same language as section 12-c (1) (b) (1). section 100 ( .....

Petitioner Vs. Respondent

Court : Chennai

..... relevant prescribed register before the district electoral officer, chennai district viz., the commissioner of corporation of chennai, under rule 88 of the rules under representation of people act. 7. the learned senior counsel for the applicant/1st respondent projects an argument that as far as the election expenditure of the election petitioner ..... senior counsel for the applicant/1st respondent submits that the 1st respondent/election petitioner has taken a new stand with reference to 10a of the representation of the people act, 1951 11. the learned senior counsel for the applicant/1st respondent refers to the handbook for candidates of election commission of india, 2009 ..... 1 of 2011) had stated that the he had submitted his accounts to the authorities concerned well within the time limit prescribed under the representation of the people act and obtain the necessary approval by the concerned authority etc. 18. the learned senior counsel for the 1st respondent/election petitioner brings it .....

C.C. Singpho Vs. Khumral Lungphi and Another

Court : Guwahati

..... , be further pleased to (iii) declare the election of the respondent no. 2, the returned candidate from bordumsa-diyun legislative assembly constituency to be void under the mandate of the representation of peoples act, 1951 and the conduct of election rules, 1961. 4. before coming to the grounds seeking striking out of the pleadings and rejection of the election petition, it is ..... 1. with the help of an election petition, made under sections 80 and 80a read with section 81 of the representation of the people act, 1951, (in short, the rop act), the opposite party herein, as election petitioner, has called in question the election of the present applicant (who, stands, now, impleaded, in the .....

Manoj Kumar Shokeen Vs. Raghuvinder Shokeen

Court : Delhi

..... respondent no.1 for dismissal of the election petition) in election petition no. 1/2015 1. this application has been filed by the respondent under section 86 of the representation of the people act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the act ) for dismissing the election petition. theelection petition has been filed by the petitioner sh. manoj kumar shokeen praying for issuing of ..... procedure for the verification of pleadings. the petition is accompanied by an affidavit in form 25 as required by proviso to sub-section (1) of section 83 of the representation of the people act, 1951 (hereinafter, 'the act') and rule 94-a of the conduct of election rules, 1961 (hereinafter, 'the rules'). the affidavit so filed has been sworn before a commissioner .....

Nimmaka Jaya Raju Vs. Janardhana That Raj Veera Vara Thodaramala and O ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... not appearing in person or by advocate.) 1. an election petition under section 81 read with section 5(a) and section 100(1)(a) and (d)(i) of the representation of the people act, 1951 (for short the act) to declare the election of the 1st respondent to 130-kurupam (s.t.) assembly constituency to be null and void, set aside the ..... and set aside the same; b) further declare that the petitioner has been duly elected as member of the 130 kurupam (st) assembly constituency under sec. 84 of the representation of the people act 1951. the petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of sri. boppa tarakam, sr ..... (prayers: election petition under section 81, r/w, section 5 (a), section 100 (1) (a) and (d) (i) of the representation of the people act 1951, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit, the high court may be pleased to a) declare the election of janardhana that raj veera vara thodaramala ( .....

Satish Mahadeorao Uke Vs. Devendra Gangadhar Fadnavis and Others

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... prescribed by the code of civil procedure. 3. before proceeding to deal with the controversy in respect of pleading of material facts, the relevant provisions of the representation of the people act, 1951 in respect of the nomination of the candidates need to be seen, which are incorporated in part v of conduct of elections, and chapter i ..... an offence(s) (other than any offence(s) referred to in subsection (1) or subsection (2) or covered in subsection (3), of section 8 of the representation of the people act, 1951 (43 of 1951) and sentenced to imprisonment for one year or more. if the deponent is convicted and punishable as aforesaid, he shall furnish the ..... constituency, nagpur and the election of the respondent no.1 i.e. returned candidate is void due to noncompliance of the provisions of constitution of india, the representation of people act as well as the rules and orders framed there-under and the other laws. ? it is not necessary to reproduce the other prayer clauses made in .....

Ashok Shankarrao Chavan Vs. Anil Trayambakrao Patil

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1988)90BOMLR39

..... , shri sakolkar has invited my attention to the following passage:the right to appeal against the order of a tribunal is conferred by section 116a of the representation of the people act, 1951, the act provides a special period of limitation different from the period of limitation prescribed, by article 116 of the limitation act, 1963, ..... exercised by the high court but refers only to such contingencies as are mentioned in the conduct of the actual elections under the provisions of the representation of the people act.hence as the period of limitation expired during the summer vacation which was a closed holiday the appellant was fully justified in filing the election ..... court who dismissed the election petition on the ground that it is barred by limitation under section 86(1) read with section 81(1) of the representation of the people act, 1951. their lordships of the supreme court followed the previous decision of the supreme court in hukumdev narain yadav v. lalit narain mishra (supra) .....

Annarao Vs. Amit and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... whether the election petition is maintainable, as it does not contain concise statement of material facts on which the petitioner relies as contemplated by the provisions of the representation of peoples act, 1951? 8. opportunity was given to the petitioner to file reply to the aforesaid application of respondent no.1 and opportunity was given even to show the ..... . on this ground, prayer was made to set aside the election of respondent no.1 under the grounds given in section 100 (1) (d) (iv) of the representation of the people act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act' for short). 7. respondent no.1 has filed written statement. on the basis of pleadings, issues are already framed. ..... no.1 has raised following points. 1) whether the election petition is maintainable as it does not contain any of the ground contemplated under section 100 of representation of peoples act, 1951? 2) whether the election petition suffers on the count of non compliance of provisions of sections 81, 82 and 83 of .....

Sunil Gayaprasad Mishra Vs. Rashtra Sant Tukdoji Maharaj University an ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... that authority. once again this decision was rendered on examination and scrutiny of the relevant and material provisions of the statute under consideration, namely, representation of the people act, 1951, section 29 thereof and election symbols (reservation and allotment) order, 1968. therefore, the supreme court held that powers to order ..... vice chancellor, take action to his satisfaction, the vice chancellor shall place before the management council the inspection or inquiry report and explanation furnished or representation made by the management, for its consideration. 47} a perusal of the same would reveal that the vice chancellor has been conferred powers which ..... granted to the recommendations of the selection committee for appointment of a lecturer in an affiliated college-in particular reference to the petitioner. the said representation/appeal was preferred on 29th july 2008. 13} the petitioner further states that from 29th july 2008 onwards, nothing was heard from the .....