Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: rajiv gandhi university act 2006 section 14 the pro vice chancellor Court: gujarat Page 1 of about 18 results (0.090 seconds)

Bagsara Nagar Palika Vs. Anantray N. Parmar

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2003)4GLR470

..... treated as notional.7. i have perused the entire award passed by the tribunal, bhavnagar. in similar situation, the apex court has considered the case of gujarat agricultural university v. rathod labhu bechar reported in air 2001 sc 706. after considering the facts of that case, the apex court observed after examining the proposed scheme of the gujarat ..... finding of fact based on the record arrived at by the industrial tribunal. this aspect has been recently examined by the apex court in case of essen deinki v. rajiv kumar, 2003 sc labour & service page 13. relevant paragraphs are as under:2. generally speaking, exercise of jurisdiction under article 227 of the constitution is limited and ..... on the score that error must be that of law and patently on record committed by the interior tribunal so as to warrant intervention - it ought not to act as a court of appeal and there is no dissension or even a contra-note being sounded at any point of time till date. incidentally, the illegality, if .....

Manubhai D. Shah Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1981Guj15; (1981)0GLR206

..... , the right to receive, the right to read and freedom of inquiry, freedom of thought, and freedom to teach - in-deed the freedom of the entire university community'.'the right of association, like the right of belief, is more than the right to attend a meeting and includes the right to express one's attitudes ..... in reality and in substance nothing but an instance of the exercise of the named fundamental right.' this is what supreme court has inter alia observed in maneka gandhi's case (supra).14. mr. patel has then invited our attention to the decision of the supreme court in ramana davararn shetty v. the international airport authority ..... a statute in reference to the rights guaranteed under article 19(1), but it is the reality and substance which determine its constitutionality. section 3 of the act with which the supreme court was concerned in the hamdard dawakhana case (supra) inter alia prohibited the publication of all advertisements referring to certain drugs specified in that .....

indravijaysinh Bhikhubha Gohil Vs. State of Gujarat and 3 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2006)1GLR849

..... for nomination. but the very next logical step of nomination has to be in the backdrop of the requirement of rotation and not repetition as per the bhavnagar university act. the nomination of the petitioner is actuated out of the policy of rotation, whereas the respondent no. 4 insists that he ought to have been nominated which ..... the impugned order.20. principles of natural justice have an important places in modern administrative law. they have been defined to mean fair play in action. (see: smt. maneka gandhi v. union of india, : [1978]2scr621 , bhagwati, j.). as laid down by this court they constitute the basic elements of a fair hearing, having their roots in ..... 12.1 a contention has been raised that no opportunity has been given to the petitioner while passing the impugned order. in this regard section 67 of the bhavnagar university act, 1978 is required to be seen, which reads as under:67. where any question arises as to if any question arise regarding the interpretation of any:(1) .....

Shamlaji Arogya Seva Trust Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2002)4GLR3637

..... field relating the 'grant of approvals' for establishing technical institutions and the provisions of the central act alone were to be complied with. so far as the provisions of the mahatma gandhi university act or its statutes were concerned and in particular statute 9(7), they merely required the university to obtain the 'views' of the state government. that could not be characterised as requiring ..... the 'approval' of the state government. if, indeed, the university statute could be so interpreted, such a provision requiring approval .....

Patel Raojibhai Kalidas Vs. State of Gujarat Sachivalaya, Ahmedabad

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1964Guj51

..... correcting or contradicting any relevant statement prejudicial to their view'.' we 'may also refer to the following observations of the privy council in 1960-1 all er 631 university of ceylon v. fernando :'as no special form of procedure was prescribed, it was for the vice-chancellor to determine the procedure to be followed, as he ..... of the municipality in its general meeting. 3. withdrawn the authorisation on his own authority although the councillors shri f.j. patel and shri v.p. gandhi were authorised by the municipality in its general meeting to take steps for expeditious execution of the drainage scheme. 4. moved government to change the site of ..... 1924-1 kb 171 as under :-'whenever any body of persons having legal authority to determine questions affecting rights of subjects, and having the duty to act judicially act in excess of their legal authority they are subject to the controlling jurisdiction of the king's bench division exercised in these writs'.this definition is referred .....

Mukesh V. Chavda and Another Vs. State of Gujarat and Others

Court : Gujarat

..... regard to qualification and experience for the appointment to the post of registrar has been followed. 4.3.7 mr.kariel submits that section 13 of saurashtra university act casts duty upon the syndicate to frame statutes for regulating appointment of registrar, and therefore, in absence of any statute, the administrative order laying down ..... no right whatsoever to question the legality and validity of the order passed by the chancellor under section 7(4) of the saurashtra university act, 1965 [the act, hereafter] since the respondent no.4 had never challenged the same before any appropriate forum. according to mr. kariel, the respondent no. ..... that fall for determination in this application are: "[1]. whether the order passed by the chancellor under section 7(4) of the act is binding upon the university. [2]. whether the university, without challenging the order passed by the chancellor before the appropriate forum, can contend before this court that the order passed by the chancellor .....

Executive Engineer Vs. Shankarbhai Jivabhai Patel

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : [2006(111)FLR164]

..... : 1994(2) lab lj 1127 (orissa)(7) chakradhar tripathy v. state of orissa 1992 lab ic 1813 (orissa)(8) shailendra nath shukla v. vice-chancellar, allahabad university 1987 lab ic 1607.9. termination of service of casual workmen on daily wages will not fall within the exception contained in sub-clause (bb) of section 2(oo ..... employee under section 2(oo), namely, in the case of a `retrenchment' vis-a-vis the consequential benefits contained under section 25f of the industrial disputes act. therefore, when such extraordinary circumstances are brought out in the matter of employment and termination is resorted to by taking umbrage under section 2(oo)(bb) of ..... powers on the employer which would be destructive of the protection guaranteed by the act to the employees. but various high courts, using interpretative techniques have mellowed down the rigor of the bare reading of the statute. in shailendra nath shukla v. vice chancellor, allahabad university ([1987] lab.i.c. 1607 (all.) (d.b.), per sahai, .....

Bhikhubhai Vitthalbhai Patel and 26 ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2006)1GLR558

..... development plan having come into force. in case of surat lands, as noted earlier, lands were reserved for the purpose of south gujarat university. in exercise of powers under section 21 of the said act, the government had proposed to extend such reservation despite the fact that after the completion of the period of 10 years from the ..... since no acquisition was made by the authorities and the lands in question were proposed for re-reservation for the very same purpose of education complex of south gujarat university, the present petitioners and some other similarly situated land owners approached this high court by filing special civil application no. 6519 of 1998 and allied matters. this ..... , first as a whole and then section by section, clause by clause, phrase by phrase and word by word.19.2 in the case of union of india v. rajiv kumar, : air2003sc2917 , in para 27 of the judgment, the hon'ble supreme court observed that the golden rule for construing wills, statutes, and, in fact, all .....

iPCL Employees' Association and Anr. Vs. Indian Petrochemical Corporat ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2008)3GLR1856; (2009)ILLJ399Guj; [2008]84SCL133(Guj)

..... transferred without consent, applies in master - servant relationship and not to statutory transfers. though great emphasis was laid by learned counsel for the respondent on jawaharlal nehru university v. dr. k.s. jawatkar and ors. 1989 (supp) 1 scc 679, a close reading of the judgment makes it clear that the common law ..... of the service conditions and continuity of service, and therefore, there is no 'deemed retrenchment' of the workmen. section 25ff of the industrial disputes act, which provides for transfer of ownership or management of an undertaking does not provide that even in case where the transferee employer protects the service conditions ..... to any general or special order issued by the state government under section 3a or by the central government under section 3 of the industrial disputes act, which authorizes appropriate government to require the employer to constitute a works committee consisting of representatives of employers and workmen engaged in the establishment. if .....

Deputy Executive Engineer Vs. Raj Amarsinh Fulsinh

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 2008GLH(1)220

..... 1994(2) lab lj 1127 (orissa)(7) chakradhar tripathy v. state of orissa 1992 lab ic 1813 (orissa)(8) shailendra nath shukla v. vice-chancellar, allahabad university 1987 lab ic 1607.9. termination of service of casual workmen on daily wages will not fall within the exception contained in sub-lause (bb) of section 2(oo ..... benefit by creating disadvantageous situation for the workman and also to disentitle him or defeat his rights and protection available under the mandatory provisions of the id act, 1947. therefore, if the employer is unable to justify issuance of such periodical or temporary orders of appointment or the orders of fixed term appointment ..... powers on the employer which would be destructive of the protection guaranteed by the act to the employees. but various high courts, using interpretative techniques have mellowed down the rigor of the bare reading of the statute. in shailendra nath shukla v. vice chancellor, allahabad university [1987] lab.i.c. 1607 (all.) (d.b.), per sahai .....