Court : Delhi
..... ) which may not fall under s. 33c(1). in this connection, we may incidentally state that the observations made by this court in the case of punjab national bank ltd.(1962) i llj 23.(vide supra), that s. 33c is a provision in the nature of execution, should not be interpreted to mean that the ..... contents of para 15 of the application related to the pay scale on which the workman were employed and the fact that due to compelling circumstances qua the aviation industry, the company was constrained to re-schedule its salary structure for its employees and thus issued an office order on 14th october, 1996 revising their salaries ..... 2010 (stay), 4979/2012 % king airways through reserved on:6. h december, 2012 decided on:12. h february , 2013 ..... petitioner mr. n.k. kaul, sr. adv. with mr. rajiv shankar dvivedi, mr. raghavendra bajaj, mr. pranav bhaskar, advs. versus captain manjit singh through + ..... respondent mr. shohit chaudhary, adv. w.p.(c) 7444/2010 manjit singh through ..... petitioner .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... ) which may not fall under s. 33c(1). in this connection, we may incidentally state that the observations made by this court in the case of punjab national bank ltd.(1962) i llj 23.(vide supra), that s. 33c is a provision in the nature of execution, should not be interpreted to mean that the ..... contents of para 15 of the application related to the pay scale on which the workman were employed and the fact that due to compelling circumstances qua the aviation industry, the company was constrained to re-schedule its salary structure for its employees and thus issued an office order on 14th october, 1996 revising their salaries ..... 2010 (stay), 4979/2012 % king airways through reserved on:6. h december, 2012 decided on:12. h february , 2013 ..... petitioner mr. n.k. kaul, sr. adv. with mr. rajiv shankar dvivedi, mr. raghavendra bajaj, mr. pranav bhaskar, advs. versus captain manjit singh through + ..... respondent mr. shohit chaudhary, adv. w.p.(c) 7444/2010 manjit singh through ..... petitioner .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... ) which may not fall under s. 33c(1). in this connection, we may incidentally state that the observations made by this court in the case of punjab national bank ltd.(1962) i llj 23.(vide supra), that s. 33c is a provision in the nature of execution, should not be interpreted to mean that the ..... contents of para 15 of the application related to the pay scale on which the workman were employed and the fact that due to compelling circumstances qua the aviation industry, the company was constrained to re-schedule its salary structure for its employees and thus issued an office order on 14th october, 1996 revising their salaries ..... 2010 (stay), 4979/2012 % king airways through reserved on:6. h december, 2012 decided on:12. h february , 2013 ..... petitioner mr. n.k. kaul, sr. adv. with mr. rajiv shankar dvivedi, mr. raghavendra bajaj, mr. pranav bhaskar, advs. versus captain manjit singh through + ..... respondent mr. shohit chaudhary, adv. w.p.(c) 7444/2010 manjit singh through ..... petitioner .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... ) which may not fall under s. 33c(1). in this connection, we may incidentally state that the observations made by this court in the case of punjab national bank ltd.(1962) i llj 23.(vide supra), that s. 33c is a provision in the nature of execution, should not be interpreted to mean that the ..... contents of para 15 of the application related to the pay scale on which the workman were employed and the fact that due to compelling circumstances qua the aviation industry, the company was constrained to re-schedule its salary structure for its employees and thus issued an office order on 14th october, 1996 revising their salaries ..... 2010 (stay), 4979/2012 % king airways through reserved on:6. h december, 2012 decided on:12. h february , 2013 ..... petitioner mr. n.k. kaul, sr. adv. with mr. rajiv shankar dvivedi, mr. raghavendra bajaj, mr. pranav bhaskar, advs. versus captain manjit singh through + ..... respondent mr. shohit chaudhary, adv. w.p.(c) 7444/2010 manjit singh through ..... petitioner .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... ) which may not fall under s. 33c(1). in this connection, we may incidentally state that the observations made by this court in the case of punjab national bank ltd.(1962) i llj 23.(vide supra), that s. 33c is a provision in the nature of execution, should not be interpreted to mean that the ..... contents of para 15 of the application related to the pay scale on which the workman were employed and the fact that due to compelling circumstances qua the aviation industry, the company was constrained to re-schedule its salary structure for its employees and thus issued an office order on 14th october, 1996 revising their salaries ..... 2010 (stay), 4979/2012 % king airways through reserved on:6. h december, 2012 decided on:12. h february , 2013 ..... petitioner mr. n.k. kaul, sr. adv. with mr. rajiv shankar dvivedi, mr. raghavendra bajaj, mr. pranav bhaskar, advs. versus captain manjit singh through + ..... respondent mr. shohit chaudhary, adv. w.p.(c) 7444/2010 manjit singh through ..... petitioner .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... ) which may not fall under s. 33c(1). in this connection, we may incidentally state that the observations made by this court in the case of punjab national bank ltd.(1962) i llj 23.(vide supra), that s. 33c is a provision in the nature of execution, should not be interpreted to mean that the ..... contents of para 15 of the application related to the pay scale on which the workman were employed and the fact that due to compelling circumstances qua the aviation industry, the company was constrained to re-schedule its salary structure for its employees and thus issued an office order on 14th october, 1996 revising their salaries ..... 2010 (stay), 4979/2012 % king airways through reserved on:6. h december, 2012 decided on:12. h february , 2013 ..... petitioner mr. n.k. kaul, sr. adv. with mr. rajiv shankar dvivedi, mr. raghavendra bajaj, mr. pranav bhaskar, advs. versus captain manjit singh through + ..... respondent mr. shohit chaudhary, adv. w.p.(c) 7444/2010 manjit singh through ..... petitioner .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
..... the attendance of the parties through process of court.26. in view of the judgment of the hon ble supreme court in the cases of ajaya sinha (supra), interglobe aviation ltd. (supra) and bar 24 council of india (supra), the contrary view expressed by any high court is of no consequence.27. for the reasons stated above ..... have both conciliatory and adjudicatory functions 19. at this juncture, it is necessary to refer to a decision of the hon ble supreme court in the case of interglobe aviation limited v. n. satchidanand, (2011) 7 scc 463.wherein it has been held as under: 26 ..each and every provision of chapter vi-a of the ..... judgment of the jharkhand high court in the cases of sandip ekka vs. selesta kerketa, air 201.jharkhand 130; branch manager, hazaribag branch, national insurance company co. ltd. v. anand prakash handa, air 201.jharkhand 6; divisional manager, national insurance co. ltd. v. usha sinha & ors., air 201.jharkhand 5, divisional manager, new india assurance co. ltd., ranchi v. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... of india through ministry of human resources development, department of school education and literacy and the order dated 15.12.2010 passed by the director, department of education, government of national capital territory of delhi. facts from wp(c) no.263/2011 2. this is also a pro bono publico petition filed by delhi commission for protection of child rights challenging .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
..... not united states persons and are reasonably believed to be located outside the united states. before doing so, the attorney general and the director of national intelligence normally must obtain the foreign intelligence surveillance court s (fisc) approval. surveillance under 1881a is subject to statutory conditions, judicial authorization, congressional ..... persons [ 1 ] and are reasonably believed to be located outside the united states. before doing so, the attorney general and the director of national intelligence normally must obtain the foreign intelligence surveillance court s approval. respondents are united states persons whose work, they allege, requires them to engage ..... fourth amendment. section 1881a provides that, upon the issuance of an order from the foreign intelligence surveillance court, the attorney general and the director of national intelligence may authorize jointly, for a period of up to 1 year . . . , the targeting of persons reasonably believed to be located outside .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Australia High Court
..... into their personal domain of unsolicited material which is seriously offensive. 321. in the 18th century, postal services were made a sovereign function in many nations, because they were considered a necessity. it was not possible to have government without communication[343]. this underscores the importance of the implied freedom in ..... said[74]: "if there has been one great federal success it has been the american post office". postal services were properly seen as a species of national communications infrastructure. 34. a power was conferred upon the commonwealth parliament by s 51(v) of the constitution to make laws with respect to: "postal, ..... adelaide in 1897, there was some discussion about whether the commonwealth parliament should have legislative responsibility for both postal and telegraphic services[71]. however, the national significance of those services never seems to have been in doubt[72]. a proposal to limit federal power to postal and telegraphic services outside the .....
Tag this Judgment!