Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... rider. therefore, the insurance company is not at all liable to pay any compensation to the claimants.6. on the basis of the pleadings of the parties, the claims tribunal framed the issues and thereafter recorded the evidence.7. the claimants, in order to prove their case, examined two witnesses as p.ws.1 and 2 and got marked ..... 27. subsequently, the apex court in the case of ramkhiladi and another(supra) considering the entire spectrum of law in a claim arising out of section 163a of the act has held as follows:9. 1 the learned tribunal held that even in absence of the driver, owner and the insurance company of another vehicle involved in an accident and whose ..... as the act , for short) have been filed by the claimants and insurance company being aggrieved by the judgment dated 05.02.2011 passed by the presiding officer fast track court-iii & additional mact, belagavi in m.v.c.nos.440 and 441 of 2008.2. parties will be referred to as per their ranking before the claims tribunal.3. facts .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... rider. therefore, the insurance company is not at all liable to pay any compensation to the claimants.6. on the basis of the pleadings of the parties, the claims tribunal framed the issues and thereafter recorded the evidence.7. the claimants, in order to prove their case, examined two witnesses as p.ws.1 and 2 and got marked ..... 27. subsequently, the apex court in the case of ramkhiladi and another(supra) considering the entire spectrum of law in a claim arising out of section 163a of the act has held as follows:9. 1 the learned tribunal held that even in absence of the driver, owner and the insurance company of another vehicle involved in an accident and whose ..... as the act , for short) have been filed by the claimants and insurance company being aggrieved by the judgment dated 05.02.2011 passed by the presiding officer fast track court-iii & additional mact, belagavi in m.v.c.nos.440 and 441 of 2008.2. parties will be referred to as per their ranking before the claims tribunal.3. facts .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... rider. therefore, the insurance company is not at all liable to pay any compensation to the claimants.6. on the basis of the pleadings of the parties, the claims tribunal framed the issues and thereafter recorded the evidence.7. the claimants, in order to prove their case, examined two witnesses as p.ws.1 and 2 and got marked ..... 27. subsequently, the apex court in the case of ramkhiladi and another(supra) considering the entire spectrum of law in a claim arising out of section 163a of the act has held as follows:9. 1 the learned tribunal held that even in absence of the driver, owner and the insurance company of another vehicle involved in an accident and whose ..... as the act , for short) have been filed by the claimants and insurance company being aggrieved by the judgment dated 05.02.2011 passed by the presiding officer fast track court-iii & additional mact, belagavi in m.v.c.nos.440 and 441 of 2008.2. parties will be referred to as per their ranking before the claims tribunal.3. facts .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... 173(1) of the motor vehicles act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the act for short) has been filed by the respondent-insurance company being aggrieved by the judgment and award dated 02.01.2012 passed by the principal senior civil judge and additional motor accident claims tribunal, hubli (hereinafter referred to as the tribunal for short), in m.v.c. ..... this court in exercise of its power under order 41 rule 33 cpc should grant the relief which ought to have been granted by the tribunal, as in a claim arising under motor vehicles act, the tribunal is required to award just and reasonable compensation.10. order 41 rules 33 of cpc reads as under: order xli rule 33. power of ..... the deceased sustained fatal injuries and succumbed to the same on the spot.5. the claimants namely the parents of the deceased filed a claim petition before the tribunal under section 166 of the act on the ground that the deceased was aged 20 years was earning rs.5,000/- per month and the family was running on the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... material placed by the parties to such dispute.37. in view of the ratio laid down by the hon ble apex court in the matter of cauvery disputes tribunal reported in 1993 supp(1) scc96ii) and in case of indian aluminium company and others vs. state of kerala reported in (1996) 7 scc637 the ..... were prescribed for employees in educational institutions receiving maintenance grant from state government. whereas the teaching staff in private management institutions admitted to grant- in-aid, claim extension of benefit of one increment for having passed sslc examination with kannada as a language or kannada language examination, on par with the pay and emoluments ..... institutions. she would submit to this court that the state legislature is competent to legislate such law. having regard to the provisions of karnataka education act, the impugned act no.4/2015 is enacted with an object to see that private aided educational institutions are to be developed and standard are maintained at par with .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... disposed of by this common order.2. the petitioners have challenged the orders passed by the karnataka state administrative tribunal at bengaluru/belagavi (for short, the ksat ), in applications filed by the petitioners under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985 (for short, act 1985 ) challenging the recommendation of the hon ble upalokayukta vide reports under section 12(3) of the karnataka lokayukta ..... taken in respect of appointments, removals, pay, discipline, superannuation or other matters relating to conditions of service of public servants but not including action relating to claims for pension, gratuity, provident fund or to any claims which arise on retirement, removal or termination of service.16. rule 20 of the karnataka civil services (general recruitment) rules, 1977 runs as under: 20.misconduct .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... disposed of by this common order.2. the petitioners have challenged the orders passed by the karnataka state administrative tribunal at bengaluru/belagavi (for short, the ksat ), in applications filed by the petitioners under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985 (for short, act 1985 ) challenging the recommendation of the hon ble upalokayukta vide reports under section 12(3) of the karnataka lokayukta ..... taken in respect of appointments, removals, pay, discipline, superannuation or other matters relating to conditions of service of public servants but not including action relating to claims for pension, gratuity, provident fund or to any claims which arise on retirement, removal or termination of service.16. rule 20 of the karnataka civil services (general recruitment) rules, 1977 runs as under: 20.misconduct .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... disposed of by this common order.2. the petitioners have challenged the orders passed by the karnataka state administrative tribunal at bengaluru/belagavi (for short, the ksat ), in applications filed by the petitioners under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985 (for short, act 1985 ) challenging the recommendation of the hon ble upalokayukta vide reports under section 12(3) of the karnataka lokayukta ..... taken in respect of appointments, removals, pay, discipline, superannuation or other matters relating to conditions of service of public servants but not including action relating to claims for pension, gratuity, provident fund or to any claims which arise on retirement, removal or termination of service.16. rule 20 of the karnataka civil services (general recruitment) rules, 1977 runs as under: 20.misconduct .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... disposed of by this common order.2. the petitioners have challenged the orders passed by the karnataka state administrative tribunal at bengaluru/belagavi (for short, the ksat ), in applications filed by the petitioners under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985 (for short, act 1985 ) challenging the recommendation of the hon ble upalokayukta vide reports under section 12(3) of the karnataka lokayukta ..... taken in respect of appointments, removals, pay, discipline, superannuation or other matters relating to conditions of service of public servants but not including action relating to claims for pension, gratuity, provident fund or to any claims which arise on retirement, removal or termination of service.16. rule 20 of the karnataka civil services (general recruitment) rules, 1977 runs as under: 20.misconduct .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... disposed of by this common order.2. the petitioners have challenged the orders passed by the karnataka state administrative tribunal at bengaluru/belagavi (for short, the ksat ), in applications filed by the petitioners under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985 (for short, act 1985 ) challenging the recommendation of the hon ble upalokayukta vide reports under section 12(3) of the karnataka lokayukta ..... taken in respect of appointments, removals, pay, discipline, superannuation or other matters relating to conditions of service of public servants but not including action relating to claims for pension, gratuity, provident fund or to any claims which arise on retirement, removal or termination of service.16. rule 20 of the karnataka civil services (general recruitment) rules, 1977 runs as under: 20.misconduct .....
Tag this Judgment!