Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: railway claims tribunal act 1987 chapter 1 preliminary Court: andhra pradesh Page 14 of about 4,921 results (0.420 seconds)

G. Rajendranath Goud Vs. State of A.P. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2006(1)ALD705; 2006(2)ALT115

..... members of the founder's family. they would urge that after abolition of hereditary trusteeship by reason of section 16 of act no. 30 of 1987, the petitioner cannot claim any hereditary rights. the petitioner's claim if any was never considered nor the petitioner was declared as member of the founder's family. the learned counsel ..... board of trustees. in the meanwhile, the third respondent herein appears to have approached the second respondent by making applications on 22.8.2003 and 30.6.2005 claiming himself to be the member of the founder's family. the representations were not disposed of by the second respondent and therefore, the third respondent filed w. ..... also deny the allegations that the respondents 3 to 5 filed affidavits before the deputy commissioner when o.a.no. 1 of 1987 filed under 1966 act was .....

The Union of India, Rep. by General Manger, South Central Railway, Sec ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... one. but, the claims were made before the railway claims tribunal at secunderabad as well as before the authority under the workmens compensation act, 1923, one after the other. even a reading of section 167 of the motor vehicles act would indicate that when a claim arises under the said act and under the workmens compensation act, the person entitled to claim compensation may claim compensation only under either ..... of these acts and not under both the acts .....

Channabasappa V. Bangari Vs. Chief Security Commissioner, Railway Prot ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(6)ALT40

..... dated 22-2-2000 on the ground that the petitioner had given false declaration under rule 67.2 of railway protection force rules, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as the 'rules') and hence the present writ petition claiming the reliefs stated supra.3. counter-affidavit is filed on behalf of the respondents denying several of the allegations ..... respondents are more concerned with the non-furnishing of the information by the petitioner. the learned counsel further submitted that it is a matter concerned with the railway protection force and hence a person seeking employment in such a force is expected to disclose all the particulars and with that object only these columns are ..... under:'the director general may, from time to time, issue such directions in the form of directives, relating to the enforcement and furtherance of the provisions of the act and these rules, as he may think necessary and the superior officers and enrolled members of the force shall be governed by such ' directives ' in the .....

P. Ram Reddy Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and Another

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1990AP76

..... is affirmed that where there is no stipulation in the document as to the date on which the principal is to be repaid, interest cannot be claimed by virtue of section 1 of the interest act of 1839. it is obvious that in so far as the question of payment of professional fee is concerned, there is no provision under which interest ..... section 1 of the interest act of 1839 was considered. the privi council laid down the principles regarding the award of ..... the provisions of s. 4(2)(b) of the interest act of 1978 it is difficult to see how the petitioner can be said to be entitled to the payment of interest @ 12% p. a. as claimed by him. 10. the learned advocate-general has relied upon a decision reported in b.n. railway v. ruttanji ramji, air 1938 pc 67 in which .....

A. Peddanna Vs. Divisional Security Commissioner, Railway Protection F ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2006(2)ALD560; 2006(4)ALT631; [2006(109)FLR784]

..... in the counter-affidavit filed by the respondent, the circumstances that led to the initiation of disciplinary proceedings are narrated. it is stated that rule 146.4 of railway protection force rules, 1987 (for short 'rpf rules') is attracted, inasmuch as the petitioner has brought disrepute to the rpf, by having been subjected to judicial ..... necessity for the rpf to initiate departmental proceedings against the petitioner on the allegation that he has committed a crime punishable under section 3(1)(x) of the act.15. for the foregoing reasons, this court is of the view that the respondent cannot proceed with the disciplinary proceedings, at this stage. the writ petition ..... . however, the basis for such an allegation is ultimately, the very involvement of the petitioner in a crime punishable under section 3(1)(x) of the act, which in turn was specifically mentioned in the charge framed in the departmental proceedings. the petitioner can be said to have resorted to the misconduct as indicated .....

Union of India (Uoi) by Its General Manager, S.C. Railway Vs. Kandula ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2002ACJ371

..... rao, j.1. the appellant railways challenge the award of the railway claims tribunal at secunderabad in o.a.a. no. 92 of 1997 dated 16.4.1998 allowing the claim for compensation of rs. 40,000, i.e., rs. 20,000 each to the respondent nos. 1 and 2 for the death of the deceased.2. according to claim, on 4.5.1997 the deceased ..... liable for compensation.5. mr. t. ramakrishna rao, the learned standing counsel for the appellant, placing reliance on various provisions of the railways act and the rules made thereunder, sought to show that the deceased and her son, not being passengers, no liability can be fastened.6. mr. n. parthasarathy, the learned counsel for ..... obligations on the part of passenger, for which no foundation is laid. therefore, it has to be held that the deceased was a passenger, along with her son and the railways are rightly held to be liable. however, as no arguments are advanced on the quantum of compensation, it remains.11. accordingly, there are no merits in the appeal and the .....

St. theresa's Tender Loving Care Home rep. by Its Chief Co-ordinator V ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2009(4)ALT54

..... inter-country adoption, 1993, failing which, action shall be taken against defaulting agency.conspectus of legal position20. the conspectus of orphanages act and rules, the institutions act and rules as well as cara guidelines would show that every agency, which establishes an institution for reception, care, protection and ..... and cancellation of licence etc. rule 5 prescribes eligibility for establishment of institution. the criteria are - (a) the institution shall be registered under societies registration act, 1860; (b) shall furnish social status, activity and reputation of members of managing committee; (c) shall provide suitable accommodation facilities and sanitary conditions; ..... cara in 1997 and as the recognition expired on 05-10-2001, there is no valid licence. petitioner is not recognized institution under orphanage act. the petitioner was found purchasing children from vulnerable lambada community people through agents. in 1999, superintendent of police (sp), nalgonda, found that .....

D.V.V. Satya Prasad and ors. Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1996(1)ALT390

..... be treated as equals and, therefore, rule 73 is liable to be struck down as violative of articles 14 and 16 of the constitution. section 11 (2) (d) of the act, which is claimed as the source of power for rule 73, is at variance with the legislative prescription contained in section 116-a of the ..... act conferring power on the registrar of co-operative societies to constitute common cadres for posts in certain co-operative societies mentioned therein including co-operative banks. section 15-a is ..... functional necessity.' the validity of the combined seniority of the officers in each of the separate groups was in issue in that case. 32. both on principal and precedent, the claim of the petitioners that the equation of posts and integration of services was done unjustly is unsustainable. rule 73 does not suffer from the vice of unconstitutionality either on the .....

Murthy Raghava Trinadha Rao and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Endowments, G ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2006(1)ALD86

..... of chapter-v of the andhra pradesh charitable and hindu religious institutions and endowments act, 1987 (for short 'the act') with respect to 2nd respondent-math.2. it is alleged that the math is being subjected to misuse of hundi collections. all the petitioners claimed that they are ardent devotees of goddess sri sri sri lalitha devi and they ..... is duty bound to take action in terms of sections 52 and 53 of the act for the purpose of appointment of mathadhipathi to the 2nd respondent math.5. counter-affidavits have been filed by all the respondents. the 3rd respondent, who claims to be the mathadhipathi of 'sri sri sri lalitha devi math', has filed counter ..... respondent math in accordance with law. this argument has been resisted by the respondents, as has been pointed out hereinabove. the respondents have also claimed that the math is a private math and not a public math and therefore, the provisions of the act would not apply.11. in order to appreciate these arguments, a glance at the .....

Vedantam Srinivasa Chary Vs. Assistant Commissioner, Endowments Dept., ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2005(2)ALD581; 2005(3)ALT43

..... authority exceeded its powers?2. committed an error of law.3. committed a breach of the rules of natural justice.4. reached a decision which no reasonable tribunal would have reached or.5. abused its powers.'28. reliance was also placed on the decision in peddinti venkata murali ranganatha desika iyengar v. government of a ..... of these writ petitions, which were granted to the respective parties without affording any opportunity to the other party. though virtually these are rival claims for issuance of certificates under the act of 1955, relating to the self same property, the quasi-judicial authority-cum-sub-collector, bhongir, decided these matters and issued certificates in ..... been given to the petitioner's father for rendering service to the deity. the hereditary rights of archakas were abolished by the act of 1987 (act no. 30 of 1987). the petitioner cannot claim the occupancy rights against the lands vested for the service of the temple. that is the reason why the authorities have now .....