Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2001(3)ALD499; 2001(4)ALT88
order1. the issue to be decided being common in all these three writ petitions, they can be disposed of by a common order.2. the students 11 in number, who passed diploma in chemical engineering in (petro chemicals) and plastics and polymers at the government institute of post diploma course in engineering and technologies (getcet) filed these three writ petitions questioning the action of the 2nd respondent-convener, ecet(fdh) 1999-2000 jntu, in the college of engineering, hyderabad, in not considering their case for admission into the chemical engineering course, by treating the institution in which they haveprosecuted their studies as a statewide institution.3. after filing of the writ petitions, it seems two petitioners secured payment seat in private colleges and they are prosecuting their studies in the engineering colleges. hence the issue that has been cropped up in these writ petitions can be adjudicated with reference to the other petitioners.4. the president of india, in exercise of the powers conferred on him under clause 1 of article 371-d of the constitution of india issued the andhra pradesh educational institutions (regulation of admissions) order, 1974 for providing equitable opportunities and facilities for the people belonging to different parts of the state in the matter of admissions to the educational institutions, which is herein after referred to as six point formulae in gsr no.299e, dated 1-7-1974. under paragraph 3 of the presidential order, the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : AIR1993AP333; 1993(1)ALT537
order1. the challenge in this revision petition is that the ground on which eviction of the 1st petitioner tenant was sought no more exists, as the landlady who sought the petition schedule premises for bona fide requirement has since died.2. sri satyanarayana prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner tenants, states that originally the eviction petition r.c.c. no. 108 of 1980 was filed before the rent controller, rajahmundry, on two grounds viz. (1) acts of waste by the tenant and (2) bona fide requirement for starting business; that the bona fide requirement of the landlady for -starting business was not existing as on the date of the order of the lower appellate court, as the landlady died and therefore the lower appellate court ought to have rejected the eviction petition. it is further contended that the decisions of the supreme court from time to time would indicate that though normally the high court would not interfere when there is a concurrent finding by both the courts below, as the high court cannot advert to itself as a second court of first appeals, yet the recent decisions of the supreme court would indicate that when revisions are filed under the rent controj act, unlike revisions under s. 115 of the civil procedure code, the scope of enquiry is more wider. placing reliance on latest decisions of the supreme court, it is urged by sri prasad that in the instant case, interference of this court is very much needed.3. in order to appreciate the contentions of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2005(3)ALD155; 2005(1)ALT513
orderv.v.s. rao, j.background of the case1. this common order shall dispose of both the writ petitions as common questions of fact and law arise for consideration. the fact of the matter as noticed hereunder is with reference to writ petition no. 8733 of 2004, which is not much different from the other, except the context. the n.t.r. university of health sciences, third respondent, (hereafter called, the university) issued a notification on 9-6-2003 inviting applications for entrance test for admission to fourteen seats of master of dental surgery (mds) in government dental college, hyderabad. the entrance test was conducted on 27-7-2003 and the results were announced on 11-8-2003. first petitioner, dr. g. rajni kumar belongs to backward class d-group. (b.c-d). he obtained rank 8 and second petitioner dr. s. sushma kumari, who belongs to b.c.-b category also appeared in the entrance test and obtained rank 23. all the persons, who were qualified in the entrance test were asked to appear before the selection committee on 20-8-2003 for counselling. the same could not, however, be proceeded with owing to certain legal impediments. at that stage, second petitioner filed w.p. no. 20769 of 2003 contending that being the highest ranking candidate among b.c.-b candidates she ought to have been offered a seat in mds (orthodontia), prayed for a writ of mandamus to declare the action of the university in filling up the seat in orthodontia reserved for b.c.b candidates with any student .....
Tag this Judgment!