Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: public wakfe extension of limitation act 1959 amending act i amendment act 22 of 67 no 1 Page 8 of about 344 results (0.177 seconds)

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri. Srinivas V Vs. The Tahsildar

Court : Karnataka

..... "land grabber" it must be shown that : (i) (a) he has taken unauthorisedly, unfairly, 453 greedily, snatched forcibly, violently or unscrupulously any land belonging to government or a local authority, a religious or charitable institution or endowment, including a wakf, or any other private person; (b) without any lawful entitlement; and (c) with a view to illegally taking possession of such lands, or enter or create illegal tenancies or lease and licences agreements or any other illegal agreements in respect ..... . 5.6 he would submit that insofar as the issue of limitation raised, would not be a substantive right and there is no limitation to be followed and draws 377 the attention of the court to section 10 of the limitation act, 1963 to contend that the issue of limitation cannot be raised in respect of property having been vested in ..... 166. this petition is filed in the public interest for declaring the klgp act-2011 contending that it is not applicable to inam land and residential sites within the village boundary, gramthana and to consider the representation dated 09.11.2017 (annexures-b & c) submitted to respondents-1 and 2 for amending the notification no.rd3-min58dated 13.01.1959 contending interalia that petitioners and similarly placed persons are in possession of certain extent of lands in raghavanapalya village, ..... accountant edeenahalli taluk, kasaba hobli tiptur taluk,tumkur district r/o mruthyunjayanagar extension kantchegatta road, tiptur tumkur district - 572 107. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Mrs Rosamma Varghese Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... "land grabber" it must be shown that : (i) (a) he has taken unauthorisedly, unfairly, 453 greedily, snatched forcibly, violently or unscrupulously any land belonging to government or a local authority, a religious or charitable institution or endowment, including a wakf, or any other private person; (b) without any lawful entitlement; and (c) with a view to illegally taking possession of such lands, or enter or create illegal tenancies or lease and licences agreements or any other illegal agreements in respect ..... . 5.6 he would submit that insofar as the issue of limitation raised, would not be a substantive right and there is no limitation to be followed and draws 377 the attention of the court to section 10 of the limitation act, 1963 to contend that the issue of limitation cannot be raised in respect of property having been vested in ..... 166. this petition is filed in the public interest for declaring the klgp act-2011 contending that it is not applicable to inam land and residential sites within the village boundary, gramthana and to consider the representation dated 09.11.2017 (annexures-b & c) submitted to respondents-1 and 2 for amending the notification no.rd3-min58dated 13.01.1959 contending interalia that petitioners and similarly placed persons are in possession of certain extent of lands in raghavanapalya village, ..... accountant edeenahalli taluk, kasaba hobli tiptur taluk,tumkur district r/o mruthyunjayanagar extension kantchegatta road, tiptur tumkur district - 572 107. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Smt Sharadamma Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... "land grabber" it must be shown that : (i) (a) he has taken unauthorisedly, unfairly, 453 greedily, snatched forcibly, violently or unscrupulously any land belonging to government or a local authority, a religious or charitable institution or endowment, including a wakf, or any other private person; (b) without any lawful entitlement; and (c) with a view to illegally taking possession of such lands, or enter or create illegal tenancies or lease and licences agreements or any other illegal agreements in respect ..... . 5.6 he would submit that insofar as the issue of limitation raised, would not be a substantive right and there is no limitation to be followed and draws 377 the attention of the court to section 10 of the limitation act, 1963 to contend that the issue of limitation cannot be raised in respect of property having been vested in ..... 166. this petition is filed in the public interest for declaring the klgp act-2011 contending that it is not applicable to inam land and residential sites within the village boundary, gramthana and to consider the representation dated 09.11.2017 (annexures-b & c) submitted to respondents-1 and 2 for amending the notification no.rd3-min58dated 13.01.1959 contending interalia that petitioners and similarly placed persons are in possession of certain extent of lands in raghavanapalya village, ..... accountant edeenahalli taluk, kasaba hobli tiptur taluk,tumkur district r/o mruthyunjayanagar extension kantchegatta road, tiptur tumkur district - 572 107. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

M/s Ferns Builders And Developers Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... "land grabber" it must be shown that : (i) (a) he has taken unauthorisedly, unfairly, 453 greedily, snatched forcibly, violently or unscrupulously any land belonging to government or a local authority, a religious or charitable institution or endowment, including a wakf, or any other private person; (b) without any lawful entitlement; and (c) with a view to illegally taking possession of such lands, or enter or create illegal tenancies or lease and licences agreements or any other illegal agreements in respect ..... . 5.6 he would submit that insofar as the issue of limitation raised, would not be a substantive right and there is no limitation to be followed and draws 377 the attention of the court to section 10 of the limitation act, 1963 to contend that the issue of limitation cannot be raised in respect of property having been vested in ..... 166. this petition is filed in the public interest for declaring the klgp act-2011 contending that it is not applicable to inam land and residential sites within the village boundary, gramthana and to consider the representation dated 09.11.2017 (annexures-b & c) submitted to respondents-1 and 2 for amending the notification no.rd3-min58dated 13.01.1959 contending interalia that petitioners and similarly placed persons are in possession of certain extent of lands in raghavanapalya village, ..... accountant edeenahalli taluk, kasaba hobli tiptur taluk,tumkur district r/o mruthyunjayanagar extension kantchegatta road, tiptur tumkur district - 572 107. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Smt Janaki Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... "land grabber" it must be shown that : (i) (a) he has taken unauthorisedly, unfairly, 453 greedily, snatched forcibly, violently or unscrupulously any land belonging to government or a local authority, a religious or charitable institution or endowment, including a wakf, or any other private person; (b) without any lawful entitlement; and (c) with a view to illegally taking possession of such lands, or enter or create illegal tenancies or lease and licences agreements or any other illegal agreements in respect ..... . 5.6 he would submit that insofar as the issue of limitation raised, would not be a substantive right and there is no limitation to be followed and draws 377 the attention of the court to section 10 of the limitation act, 1963 to contend that the issue of limitation cannot be raised in respect of property having been vested in ..... 166. this petition is filed in the public interest for declaring the klgp act-2011 contending that it is not applicable to inam land and residential sites within the village boundary, gramthana and to consider the representation dated 09.11.2017 (annexures-b & c) submitted to respondents-1 and 2 for amending the notification no.rd3-min58dated 13.01.1959 contending interalia that petitioners and similarly placed persons are in possession of certain extent of lands in raghavanapalya village, ..... accountant edeenahalli taluk, kasaba hobli tiptur taluk,tumkur district r/o mruthyunjayanagar extension kantchegatta road, tiptur tumkur district - 572 107. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Smt. Priyadarshini Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... "land grabber" it must be shown that : (i) (a) he has taken unauthorisedly, unfairly, 453 greedily, snatched forcibly, violently or unscrupulously any land belonging to government or a local authority, a religious or charitable institution or endowment, including a wakf, or any other private person; (b) without any lawful entitlement; and (c) with a view to illegally taking possession of such lands, or enter or create illegal tenancies or lease and licences agreements or any other illegal agreements in respect ..... . 5.6 he would submit that insofar as the issue of limitation raised, would not be a substantive right and there is no limitation to be followed and draws 377 the attention of the court to section 10 of the limitation act, 1963 to contend that the issue of limitation cannot be raised in respect of property having been vested in ..... 166. this petition is filed in the public interest for declaring the klgp act-2011 contending that it is not applicable to inam land and residential sites within the village boundary, gramthana and to consider the representation dated 09.11.2017 (annexures-b & c) submitted to respondents-1 and 2 for amending the notification no.rd3-min58dated 13.01.1959 contending interalia that petitioners and similarly placed persons are in possession of certain extent of lands in raghavanapalya village, ..... accountant edeenahalli taluk, kasaba hobli tiptur taluk,tumkur district r/o mruthyunjayanagar extension kantchegatta road, tiptur tumkur district - 572 107. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri T Krishna Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... "land grabber" it must be shown that : (i) (a) he has taken unauthorisedly, unfairly, 453 greedily, snatched forcibly, violently or unscrupulously any land belonging to government or a local authority, a religious or charitable institution or endowment, including a wakf, or any other private person; (b) without any lawful entitlement; and (c) with a view to illegally taking possession of such lands, or enter or create illegal tenancies or lease and licences agreements or any other illegal agreements in respect ..... . 5.6 he would submit that insofar as the issue of limitation raised, would not be a substantive right and there is no limitation to be followed and draws 377 the attention of the court to section 10 of the limitation act, 1963 to contend that the issue of limitation cannot be raised in respect of property having been vested in ..... 166. this petition is filed in the public interest for declaring the klgp act-2011 contending that it is not applicable to inam land and residential sites within the village boundary, gramthana and to consider the representation dated 09.11.2017 (annexures-b & c) submitted to respondents-1 and 2 for amending the notification no.rd3-min58dated 13.01.1959 contending interalia that petitioners and similarly placed persons are in possession of certain extent of lands in raghavanapalya village, ..... accountant edeenahalli taluk, kasaba hobli tiptur taluk,tumkur district r/o mruthyunjayanagar extension kantchegatta road, tiptur tumkur district - 572 107. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Smt Uma Balagavi Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... "land grabber" it must be shown that : (i) (a) he has taken unauthorisedly, unfairly, 453 greedily, snatched forcibly, violently or unscrupulously any land belonging to government or a local authority, a religious or charitable institution or endowment, including a wakf, or any other private person; (b) without any lawful entitlement; and (c) with a view to illegally taking possession of such lands, or enter or create illegal tenancies or lease and licences agreements or any other illegal agreements in respect ..... . 5.6 he would submit that insofar as the issue of limitation raised, would not be a substantive right and there is no limitation to be followed and draws 377 the attention of the court to section 10 of the limitation act, 1963 to contend that the issue of limitation cannot be raised in respect of property having been vested in ..... 166. this petition is filed in the public interest for declaring the klgp act-2011 contending that it is not applicable to inam land and residential sites within the village boundary, gramthana and to consider the representation dated 09.11.2017 (annexures-b & c) submitted to respondents-1 and 2 for amending the notification no.rd3-min58dated 13.01.1959 contending interalia that petitioners and similarly placed persons are in possession of certain extent of lands in raghavanapalya village, ..... accountant edeenahalli taluk, kasaba hobli tiptur taluk,tumkur district r/o mruthyunjayanagar extension kantchegatta road, tiptur tumkur district - 572 107. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri Lakshmichand Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... "land grabber" it must be shown that : (i) (a) he has taken unauthorisedly, unfairly, 453 greedily, snatched forcibly, violently or unscrupulously any land belonging to government or a local authority, a religious or charitable institution or endowment, including a wakf, or any other private person; (b) without any lawful entitlement; and (c) with a view to illegally taking possession of such lands, or enter or create illegal tenancies or lease and licences agreements or any other illegal agreements in respect ..... . 5.6 he would submit that insofar as the issue of limitation raised, would not be a substantive right and there is no limitation to be followed and draws 377 the attention of the court to section 10 of the limitation act, 1963 to contend that the issue of limitation cannot be raised in respect of property having been vested in ..... 166. this petition is filed in the public interest for declaring the klgp act-2011 contending that it is not applicable to inam land and residential sites within the village boundary, gramthana and to consider the representation dated 09.11.2017 (annexures-b & c) submitted to respondents-1 and 2 for amending the notification no.rd3-min58dated 13.01.1959 contending interalia that petitioners and similarly placed persons are in possession of certain extent of lands in raghavanapalya village, ..... accountant edeenahalli taluk, kasaba hobli tiptur taluk,tumkur district r/o mruthyunjayanagar extension kantchegatta road, tiptur tumkur district - 572 107. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Smt K N Nagarathnamma Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... "land grabber" it must be shown that : (i) (a) he has taken unauthorisedly, unfairly, 453 greedily, snatched forcibly, violently or unscrupulously any land belonging to government or a local authority, a religious or charitable institution or endowment, including a wakf, or any other private person; (b) without any lawful entitlement; and (c) with a view to illegally taking possession of such lands, or enter or create illegal tenancies or lease and licences agreements or any other illegal agreements in respect ..... . 5.6 he would submit that insofar as the issue of limitation raised, would not be a substantive right and there is no limitation to be followed and draws 377 the attention of the court to section 10 of the limitation act, 1963 to contend that the issue of limitation cannot be raised in respect of property having been vested in ..... 166. this petition is filed in the public interest for declaring the klgp act-2011 contending that it is not applicable to inam land and residential sites within the village boundary, gramthana and to consider the representation dated 09.11.2017 (annexures-b & c) submitted to respondents-1 and 2 for amending the notification no.rd3-min58dated 13.01.1959 contending interalia that petitioners and similarly placed persons are in possession of certain extent of lands in raghavanapalya village, ..... accountant edeenahalli taluk, kasaba hobli tiptur taluk,tumkur district r/o mruthyunjayanagar extension kantchegatta road, tiptur tumkur district - 572 107. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //