Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1127/2013 Gajendra Kumar Patel V/s State of Rajasthan and ors. Order dt:29. 5/2014 1/21 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1127/2013 Gajendra Kumar Patel V/s State of Rajasthan and ors.2. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1207/2013 Naresh Pandya V/s State of Rajasthan and ors.3. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1204/2013 Ramesh Chandra Chourmar V/s State of Rajasthan and ors.4. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1205/2013 Jayendra Kumar Pandya V/s State of Rajasthan and ors.5. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1206/2013 Gebee Lal Meghwal V/s State of Rajasthan and ors.6. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1211/2013 Smt. Ramila Roat V/s State of Rajasthan and ors.7. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1212/2013 Narpat Singh Chouhan V/s State of Rajasthan and ors. Date of Order :::29. h May, 2014 REPORTABLE PRESENT HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr.Mukesh Rajpurohit, for the petitioners. Ms.R.R. Kanwar, for the respondents. --- BY THE COU...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ::: S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.760/2011 Vijay Kumar Sharma versus State of Rajasthan AND S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.761/2011 Vijay Kumar Sharma versus State of Rajasthan Date of judgment: 29th May, 2015 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr.Kamal Dave ].Mr.Vijay Kumar Vyas ]., for the petitioner. Mr.Vinay Jain ].Ms.Kusum Rao ]., for the respondents. BY THE COURT: Both the above writ petitions are filed by the petitioner Vijay Kumar Sharma against the orders of punishment of dismissal from service passed by the disciplinary authority in the inquiries arising out from the charge-sheets dated 23.2.2000 and 6.6.2000. In the SBCWP No.760/2011 the petitioner has prayed that the entire process initiated and undertaken in furtherance to the charge-sheet dated 6.6.2000 (Annex.1) may kindly be declared illegal and punishment order dated 7.7.2001, so also, the order of rejection of appeal dated 19.1.2000 received by the petiti...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1231/2012 Abdul Aziz Gauri Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Order dated 23/05/2014 1/16 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1231/2012 Abdul Aziz Gauri Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order ::::23. d May, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI REPORTABLE Appearance: Dr. Nupur Bhati, for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Bissa, Addl. Govt. Counsel. -- BY THE COURT:1. Whether any estoppel or resjudicata applies for a competent authority, if he once decides not to grant such sanction for prosecution of a public servant under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and later on grants it on a reconsideration of the same material or at the instance of a higher authority, is the question?.2. The petitioner while working as Upper Division Clerk in the Industries Department, was caught red handed while taking the bribe of Rs.5000/- on 04.01.2009 in connection with work of the complainant, namely,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved against the order dated 7.9.2015 passed by the Director and Joint Secretary, Directorate, Local Self Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur, whereby the petitioner has been placed under suspension. The petitioner, who was initially appointed as Assistant Revenue Inspector on 22.12.1983 was last promoted in 1994 on the post of Revenue Inspector and at the time when the order impugned placing the petitioner under suspension was passed, he was discharging his duties on the post of Executive Officer, Municipal Board, Itawa. It is inter-alia indicated in the writ petition that in the year 2009, the services of the petitioner were transferred from the Municipal Board, Kethun to Municipal Board, Rawatbhata where he was posted as Executive Officer. The Anti Corruption Bureau ('ACB') lodged an FIR on 18.7.2012 against the petitioner and Chairman, Municipal Board for the offence under Sections 13(1)(d), 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Ac...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER: Kesari Chand Sethia Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8359/2010) DATE OF ORDER : August 2nd, 2013 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS ____________________________________ Mr. C.S. Kotwani for the petitioner. Mr. K.K. Bissa, Govt. Counsel. Mr. I.S. Pareek, Addl. Govt. Counsel. BY THE COURT : Instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner who was working on the post of Junior Accountant in the office of the Project Director, Agriculture & Land Survey Department, Bikaner to challenge the order of prosecution sanction passed against him dated 01.07.2006 (Annex.-6), so also, the suspension order dated 02.07.2010 (Annex.-8). Brief facts of the case are that on 07.06.2005, an 2 FIR was lodged against three persons namely, Vijay Singh Nahta, Pratap Singh Rao and Nakhta Ram at CPS ACB Jaipur bearing No.120/2005 under Section 13(1)(d)(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and S...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT Abdul Aziz Gauri vs. The State of Rajasthan & ors. D.B. Civil Special Appeal No.1231/2014 under Rule 134 of the Rajasthan High Court Rules, 1952 against the order dated 23.5.2014 passed by learned Single Judge in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.1231/2012. Date of Judgement :27. 10.2015 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE MISS JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR. Mr. Mahesh Bora, Senior Advocate assisted by Ms. Meenu Purohit,Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. K.L. Thakur, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Rishabh Tayal and Mr. K.L. Vishnoi, for the respondents. BY THE COURT:(Per Hon'ble Ms. Jaishree Thakur,J.) 1. The present appeal has been filed to challenge the judgment dated 23.5.2014 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1231/2012 dismissing the writ petition filed seeking to quash an order dated 19.1.2012 granting sanction to prosecute the appellant-petitioner herein.2. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER: S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7390/2014 Jitendra Kumar versus State of Rajasthan & ORS.Date of Order :: 11th December, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Dr. Sachin Acharya, for the petitioner. Ms.Kusum Rao, for the respondents. ---- BY THE COURT: This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is directed against order dated 10.09.2014 passed by the respondents, whereby, prosecution sanction against the petitioner under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ('the Act') and Section 197 Cr.P.C.has been granted. The petitioner is an Assistant Commercial Taxes Officer ('ACTO').Commercial Taxes Department; a complaint was filed by Chhitarmal at Anti Corruption Bureau, Chowki Nagaur ('ACB') on 26.01.2011 complaining that he was involved in the business of electric goods and furniture at Borawad, Makrana; on 25.01.2011 the petitioner alongwith another ACTO Krishan Kanhaiya Borana came ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER: S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7390/2014 Jitendra Kumar versus State of Rajasthan & ORS.Date of Order :: 11th December, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Dr. Sachin Acharya, for the petitioner. Ms.Kusum Rao, for the respondents. ---- BY THE COURT: This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is directed against order dated 10.09.2014 passed by the respondents, whereby, prosecution sanction against the petitioner under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ('the Act') and Section 197 Cr.P.C.has been granted. The petitioner is an Assistant Commercial Taxes Officer ('ACTO').Commercial Taxes Department; a complaint was filed by Chhitarmal at Anti Corruption Bureau, Chowki Nagaur ('ACB') on 26.01.2011 complaining that he was involved in the business of electric goods and furniture at Borawad, Makrana; on 25.01.2011 the petitioner alongwith another ACTO Krishan Kanhaiya Borana came ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 11316/2010 & 11 other connected writ petitions ( See Schedule) Jodhpur Development Authority, Jodhpur vs. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum & Ors. Judgment dt: 11/10/20111/53IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER Jodhpur Development Authority, vs. Jodhpur State Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum & Ors.S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 11316/2010 & 11 other connected writ petitions ( See Schedule) DATE OF : PRESENT HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI REPORTABLE Mr. M.C.Bhoot, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Surendra Singh, for the petitioner. Mr. Himanshu Maheshwari, for the respondents. BY THE COURT: 1. The petitioner, Jodhpur Development Authority, through its 11th October, 2011Commissioner, has approached this Court by way of present batch of writ petitions, inter alia, claiming the quashing of judgment and order dated 26/10/2009 passed by the District Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum, Jodhpur on a complaint filed under Section 12 of the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner, Vishal Kaushik, challenging order dated 26.07.2013, whereby seven applications filed by him, respectively on 15.06.2013(Annesure-3), 21.06.2013(Annexure-4 and 5); 28.06.2013(Annexure-7); 19.07.2013(Annexure-8, 9 and 10), were dismissed by Family Court, Ajmer(for short `the Family Court'). 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the petitioner filed a divorce petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 before the Family Court, Haridwar(Uttarkhand) in September, 2008. In that application, the petitioner alleged that Respondent No. 2-wife(for short `respondent-wife`) caused mental cruelty to him by different means, especially because she had extra marital affairs with a person named Kapil Rana, with whom she even had physical relationship. She used to constantly meet him at various places including at the flat of said Kapil Rana and petitioner's flat. Respondent-wife contested the divorce petition by filing wr...
Tag this Judgment!