Court : Kerala
Reported in : 2001CriLJ4448
ORDERM R. Hariharan Nair, J.1. The revision petitioners in these 26 cases are all accused in the connected cases pending trial before the Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge, Kozhikode. Of these, 12 revisions are by a contractor and 14 are filed by Engineers. An FIR was filed against them on 30-9-1985 reporting that the latter, while working as Engineers of various rank for works in the Attappady Valley Irrigation Project, Agali, during the period from 24-7-1978 to 9-11-1981, they committed criminal misconduct by abusing their official positions in the matter implementing a criminal conspiracy with the contractors aforementioned by placing four supply orders dated 17-11-80, 18-12-80, 19-2-81 and 3-2-81 for 95 numbers of 200mm Sluice valves in favour of M/s. Indira Engineering Corporation, Coimbatore, of which one of the accused is the Managing Partner causing loss of crores of rupees to the Government exchequer. After investigation, 13 charge sheets were filed on 10-3-1989 alleging ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Ashok Bhushan, C.J. 1. This writ appeal has been filed by the 1st respondent to the writ petition against the judgment dated 09.12.2015 in W.P.(C) No.2705 of 2010. The writ petition was filed by the State authorities challenging the order of the Kerala Lok Ayukta dated 03.12.2008 by which order the Lok Ayukta directed the State Government to sanction pensionary benefits to the complainant(appellant) as provided in Clause 4B of Government Order dated 02.05.1968. Aggrieved by the order of the Lok Ayukta, the State has filed the writ petition which has been allowed by the learned Single Judge by the impugned judgment. 2. The learned Single Judge took the view that the Kerala Lok Ayukta could not have exercised any authority to sanction or non-sanction of pensionary benefits, which cannot be classified as maladministration within the meaning of the Lok Ayukta Act. The learned Single Judge also noticed that the complainant took voluntary retirement on 13.01.2000 whereas the complaint was fi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
1. This original petition invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed challenging Ext.P15 order passed by the District collector under the provisions of the Kerala Escheats and Forfeitures Act, 1964, hereinafter referred to as the Escheats Act and Exts.P18 and P22 decisions of the Land Revenue Commissioner and the Government of Kerala confirming the Collector's decision. 2. Heard the learned Senior Advocate for the petitioner and the learned Senior Government Pleader. 3. Acting on information stated to have been given by a person that the parcel of land with building, which is involved in this litigation; 'property' for short, hereinafter; has escheated, the District Collector directed the Tahsildar to conduct a preliminary enquiry. Through Ext.P13, the Tahsildar reported that the property belonged to Shri Navnagar Sadavarat Trust which is the petitioner in this original petition. The Collector thereafter extended opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and issued the i...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE7H DAY OF JANUARY201517TH POUSHA, 1936 Crl.MC.No. 212 of 2013 () -------------------------- C.C.NO.904/2012 of JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-I, ALUVA. PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONERS/ACCUSED: ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. T.BABU RAJ, AGED73YRS, S/O. THOMAS, THOTTATHIL HOUSE, NEDUMBASSERY P.O., ALUVA.2. THOMAS BABU, AGED38YRS, S/O. T. BABU RAJ, THOTTATHIL HOUSE, NEDUMBASSERY P.O., ALUVA. BY ADVS.SRI.B.RAMAN PILLAI SRI.R.ANIL SRI.M.SUNILKUMAR SRI.SUJESH MENON V.B. SRI.T.ANIL KUMAR SRI.MANU TOM SRI.THOMAS ABRAHAM (NILACKAPPILLIL) RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT AND STATE: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. K.FAIZEL, S/O. ABOOBACKAR KOYA, PENTA QUEEN APARTMENTS, ABLOCK, 6TH FLOOR, PADIVATTOM, COCHIN-24.2. STATE REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA. R1 BY SRI.K. FAIZEL (PAR...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Reported in : 1959CriLJ464
ORDER No. H/4-28800/57 Home (A) 'Sanction is accorded to the Public Prosecutor, Trivandrum, under Sub-section (3) of Section 198B of theCode of Criminal Procedure, 1898 to make a complaint against Sri K. Karthikeyan, Editor, Printer and Publisher of the Newspaper 'Pothujanam' before the Court of Session, Trivandrum for the offences punishable under Sections 500 and 501 of the Indian Penal Code for having published a news item in its issue dated 21-8-1957 under the caption (words in Malayalam omitted), and also the reply of the correspondent under the caption (words in Malayalam omitted.) and the Editorial in the issue dated 23-8-1957 which are highly defamatory of the Minister for Law in respect of his conduct in the discharge of his public functions. (By order of the Governor) Sd/N.E.S. Raghavachari. Secretary to the Council of Ministers and Chief Secretary'. 37. Now it is quite apparent from its wording, and, in particular from the recital 'By order of the Governor' under which the C...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Reported in : 2001CriLJ275
ORDERK.A. Mohamed Shafi, J.1. This revision petition is filed by the accused in S.C.No. 83/94 on the file of the Asst. Sessions Court, Thiruvalla challenging the order dated 18-3-2000 passed by the Court in Cri.M.P. No. 246/99.2. The petitioners are standing trial before the Asst. Sessions Court Thiruvalla for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 324, 326, 332 and 333 r/w 149 of I.P.C. and Section 3(2)(c) of the P.D.P.P. Act as per the charge-sheet laid by the C. I. of Police, Adoor in Crime No. 204/92 of Pandalam Police Station. The allegation is that the accused persons who belonged to the I.S.S. in protest against the assault of their leader Madani by the members of the R.S.S., formed themselves into an unlawful assembly armed with deadly weapons and in prosecution of their common object to cause grievous hurt and to prevent the police officers from discharging their official duty as public servants on 7-8-1992 at about 10.30 a.m. stopped K.S.R.T.C. buses bearing re...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Reported in : 2000CriLJ1251
AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. The complainant before the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ernakulam, in complaints filed under Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 190 of the Code of Criminal Procedure alleging an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against the accused, is the petitioner in the Original Petition, which was filed :(i) to declare that in respect of the complaints lodged under Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, for taking cognizance, the examination of the complainant is not necessary under Section 200 of the Cr.P.C;(ii) to issue necessary instructions to all the Magistrates in the State of Kerala to take cognizance of the offences under Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by verifying the complaint and the documents produced by them and the examination of the complainants shall be insisted only if there is any discrepancy between them; and(iii) to issue necessary instructions to all the Magistrate to give pr...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL WEDNESDAY, THE8H DAY OF JANUARY201418TH POUSHA, 1935 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1935 of 2013 () -------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN CMP9382012 of J.M.F.C., KUTHUPARAMBA DATED1806-2013 REVISION PETITIONER(S)/COMPLAINANT: ----------------------------------- K.ABDUL SALEEM, S/O.MUHAMMED, 'BAITHUL NOOR', MUNDALOOR PO, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.U.SHAILAJAN RESPODENTS/ACCUSED & STATE:- --------------------------- 1. SAJESH VAZHAVALAPPIL, FORMER CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUTHUPARAMBA PO, KUTHUPARAMBA, KANNUR DISTRICT670643.2. RAVEENDRAN, FORMER ADDITIONAL SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUTHUPARAMBA PO, KUTHUPARAMBA, KANNUR DISTRICT670643.3. K.C.BASHEER, S/O.KADER, MEETHALE VEEDU, KATHIRUR PO, KANNUR DISTRICT670642.4. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI682031. R1 & 3 BY ADV. SRI.V.V.RAJA R1 & 3 BY ADV. SRI.M.T.SURESHKUMAR R4 BY PUBLIC P...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Reported in : II(2007)BC534; 2006CriLJ3541; 2006(3)KLT418
Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J.1. The petitioner in this application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is one of the defendants in an Original Application before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, 'DRT' for short, constituted under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').2. During the course of the said proceedings, the petitioner filed Ext.P6 petition requesting the DRT to conduct an enquiry against the second respondent therein, the Chief Manager of the Bank, under Section 340 Cr.P.C. and to make a complaint to the Magistrate of the First Class having jurisdiction to initiate proceedings. That petition was supported by an affidavit. The allegations in the said affidavit require to be referred to, without prejudice to the contentions before the DRT, for the sole purpose of noting the broad features of the allegations of the writ petitioner, which are as follows:Upon production of certain documents, the frau...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID MONDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2013/11TH BHADRA, 1935 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 639 of 2012 (D) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN CRL.M.P.NO.1446/2011 IN CC 12/2009 of SPECIAL JUDGE(SPE/CBI) -II, ERNAKULAM DATED 9.12.2011. REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT: ------------------------------------------ STATE REP.BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE CBI/SPE COCHIN BY ADV. SRI.P.CHANDRASEKHARA PILLAI, C.B.I. RESPONDENT/ACCUSED NO.4: --------------------------------- RAMALINGAM S/O.LATE KANNIAH RTD CHAIRMAN AIRPOT AUTHORITY OF INDIA, NOW R/A.NO 27 BODI CHETTI STREET CUDDALOOR, TAMILNADU-607003 R1 BY SRI.S.SREEKUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE R1 BY ADV. SRI.V.V.RAJA R1 BY ADV. SRI.M.T.SURESHKUMAR R1 BY SRI. U.U. LALITH, SENIOR ADVOCATE THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02-09-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: "C.R" HARUN-UL-RASHID, J.------------------------ Crl....
Tag this Judgment!