Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Jodhpur
Reported in : (2006)(1)SLJ209CAT
1. Shri Anil Kumar Jain has assailed the order dated 30.05.2003 (Annex.A/1), order dated 02.07.2004 (Annex. A/2) passed by the respondent No.2 and the memorandum of charges dated 14.07.99 and has prayed for declaring them as illegal as well as for quashing them with a further direction to the respondents to restore the withholding increments with all consequential benefits.2. We have heard the learned Counsel for both the parties and have carefully perused the records and pleadings of this case. The brief facts of this case are that the applicant while working on the post of Inspector of Central Excise at Bhilwara in the year 1997, was issued with a charge sheet under Rule 14 of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 (for brevity Rules), vide memo dated 14.07.99. The same contained three articles of charges.He denied the allegations and submitted that the respondent No. 3 was not the Competent Authority to issue the memorandum of charges to him sin...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Jodhpur
Reported in : (2003)(1)SLJ49CAT
1. The applicant, Dr. Bhagwat Singh, while he was posted as Senior Divisional Medical Officer at Amritsar was caught red handed on 16.02.93 in a trap which was laid by a team of CBI officers while demanding and accepting a sum of Rs. 100 as illegal gratification from one Sri Ravi Bhushan, who was at that time working as Highly Skilled Fitter Grade II, Loco Workshop, Amritsar. A criminal case under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, was registered against the applicant. After investigation, a final report was submitted. It was, however, decided to initiate departmental proceedings against the applicant. The competent authority while ordering the initiation of departmental enquiry against the applicant appointed Shri Geeta Ram, CDI/CVC by invoking provisions of the Public Servants (Inquiries) Act, 1850, as contemplated under Rule 9(1) of the Railway Servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1968--for short, the Rules of 1968, by order dated 31.10.97 (Annexure A/4).2. The statement ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Jodhpur
Reported in : (2005)(2)SLJ207CAT
1. This is an application by R. C. Lal, describing himself as TTE, Bikaner, under the North Western Railway, Bikaner Division, who has already retired on 30th June, 2003. There are four respondents led by the Union of India through the General Manager, North Western Railway, Jaipur and followed by the Chief Commercial Manager, North Western Railway, Jaipur Additional Divisional Railway Manager, North Western Railway, Bikaner and the Divisional Commercial Manager, North Western Railway, Bikaner. In all four orders are under challenge contained in Annex. A/1 dated 23.6.1986 of Mr. B.S. Jhingon, Senior D.C.M., Bikaner (not a respondent), Annex. A/ 2 dated 15.5.2001 of Mr. Vivek Angra, D.C.M., Bikaner, imposing penalty of compulsory retirement, Annex. A/3 dated 12.7.2002 by Divisional Commercial Manager - Bikaner (respondent No. 4) rejecting his appeal against the penalty and Annex. A/4 dated 1.9.2003 by Chief Commercial Manager, Jaipur, rejecting revision petition. The O.A. has been file...
Tag this Judgment!