Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: protection of women from domestic violence act 2005 Sorted by: recent Court: delhi Page 9 of about 450 results (0.156 seconds)

Nov 17 2017 (HC)

Rajat Johar vs.divya Johar

Court : Delhi

..... subsequently, on 17.07.2012 the respondent filed a petition under section 12 read with sections 18, 19, 20, 22 and 23 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 against the petitioner, father-in-law and mother-in-law, along with an application for interim maintenance under section 23 of dv act in the court of chief metropolitan magistrate, saket courts, new delhi.5. ..... the object of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 is to provide for more effective protection of the rights of women guaranteed under the constitution who are victims of violence of any kind occurring within the family and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.15. ..... the monetary relief as provided under the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 is different from maintenance, which can be in addition to an order of maintenance under section 125 cr.p.c. ..... savita bhanot; (2012) 3 scc183 has observed that the conduct of the parties even prior to the coming into force of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 could be taken into consideration while passing an order under sections 18, 19 and 20 of dv act thereof. ..... the brief facts stated are that, a petition under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 was filed crl.m.c. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 10 2017 (HC)

Sukhjinder Singh Saini vs.harvinder Kaur

Court : Delhi

..... crl.rev.p.494/2015 page 1 of 8 harvinder kaur whereby the learned special judge has dismissed an appeal filed by the present petitioner under section 29 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 against the order dated 23.01.2015 passed by learned metropolitan magistrate-01, central district, tis hazari courts, delhi in cc. ..... subsequently, the respondent/complainant filed an application under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 against the petitioner herein-sukhjinder singh saini (husband of the respondent/complainant), jaswinder kaur (mother-in law of respondent/complainant) and varinder kaur (sister in law of the respondent/complainant) along with an application under section 23 (2) of the dv act in the court of learned chief metropolitan magistrate, tis hazari courts, delhi in complaint case no.106/6/14.4. ..... aggrieved from the aforesaid order dated 23.01.2015 the petitioner preferred an appeal under section 29 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 before the learned sessions court and the learned special judge, cbi-03 (pc act), delhi vide order dated 07.05.2015 dismissed the appeal of the petitioner, i.e. ca no.04/15. ..... it is an admitted fact coming on record that the main application under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 is pending before the trial court. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 13 2017 (HC)

Siddhartha Jain & Ors vs.state Nct of Delhi & Anr

Court : Delhi

..... she preferred a petition under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as the dv act ) against the petitioners. ..... hence, to secure ends of justice, the fir bearing no.28/2016, registered on 09.03.2016 with police station, crime (women) cell, nanak pura, new delhi under sections 498a/406/506 ipc and consequential proceedings arising out of the said fir are hereby quashed.14. ..... ) no.2886/2017 page 1 of 4 the fir bearing no.28/2016, registered against them on 09.03.2016 under sections 498a/4ipc with police station crime (women) cell, nanak pura, new delhi on the complaint of respondent no.2.5. ..... the respondent no.2 has also filed a petition for restitution of conjugal rights under section 9 of the hindu marriage act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the hma ). ..... by this settlement, the petitioner and the respondent no.2 had decided to part company of each other and obtain a decree of divorce by mutual consent from the competent court. ..... the respondent no.2 submits that she has received the entire settlement amount from the petitioners. ..... both the parties have also agreed to withdraw their respective petitions from the courts.9. ..... she submits that she had also withdrawn her petition under section 12 of dv act. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 13 2017 (HC)

Dheeraj Kumar & Ors. Vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi ) & Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... the respondent no.2 preferred a petition under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as the dv act ) against the petitioners before the court of learned mm, mahila court, district shahdara, karkardooma courts, delhi. ..... she submits that she had withdrawn her petitions filed under sections 12 of dv act and 125 of cr.p.c. ..... from the concerned courts. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 13 2017 (HC)

Hari Shankar Raikwar & Ors vs.state & Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... she preferred a petition under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as the dv act ) against the petitioners in the court of learned mm, mahila court, saket, new delhi. ..... the respondent no.2 had agreed to withdraw her petition filed under section 12 of dv act and also the execution petition from the court of learned mm, mahila court, saket, new delhi.9. ..... the petitioner no.1 filed a petition for divorce against the respondent no.2 under section 13 of the hindu marriage act, 1955 bearing no.351/2013 before the learned principal judge, family court, jhansi, u.p. ..... she submits that she had withdrawn both her petitions from the court of learned mm, mahila court, saket, new delhi. ..... the respondent no.2 submits that she had received a sum of rs.1,50,000/- from the petitioner no.1 at the time of withdrawal of execution petition. ..... she submits that on 10.03.2017, she had received further a sum of rs.1,50,000/- from the petitioner no.1 at the time of withdrawal of petition under section 12 of dv act. ..... the respondent no.2 submits that she has received the entire settlement amount from the petitioner. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 11 2017 (HC)

Dr. Nihal Singh vs.dr. (Mrs.) Priyanka Singh Badalia & Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... on 06.05.2011, the respondent no.1 filed an application under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 bearing complaint case no.1003/1/2011 for maintenance for herself and her minor child/respondent no.2 before the court of the learned metropolitan magistrate, dwarka courts, ..... an admitted fact coming on record that the main application under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 is pending before the trial court. ..... 117/2015 page 2 of 9 of protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 and then decide the interim relief to be awarded to the respondents ..... the order dated 03.06.2014 passed by the learned metropolitan magistrate is an interim maintenance and the determination of the main maintenance application under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 is yet to be decided. ..... other hand, the learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that the impugned maintenance awarded is under section 23 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005. ..... the learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that the revisionist is doing medical practice apart from rental income and earning huge amounts through investments and the revisionist has himself admitted earning an amount ..... court is directed to dispose of the application under section 12 of dv act filed by the respondent-wife as soon as possible and preferably within a period of six months from the date of this judgment.24. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 09 2017 (HC)

Sardar Kamaljeet Singh vs.the State ( Govt of Nct of Delhi ) & Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... she preferred a petition under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as the dv act ) against the petitioner in the court of learned mm, mahila court, tis hazari courts, delhi.6. ..... she further submits that she had received the balance amount of rs.2,00,000/- from the petitioner by way of demand draft on 31.05.2017.9. ..... the respondent no.2 submits that she had received a sum of rs.2,25,000/- from the petitioner at the time of withdrawal of her petition under section 12 of dv act. ..... the respondent no.2 submits that she has received the entire settlement amount from the petitioner. ..... the respondent no.2 had agreed to withdraw her petition filed under section 12 of dv act. w.p. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 26 2017 (HC)

Anita Barreja vs.jagdish Lal Barreja

Court : Delhi

..... against the petitioner for restitution of conjugal rights and the petitioner has filed a complaint against the son of the respondent under the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 (domestic violence act) and in which complaint the petitioner has also sought the relief of alternate accommodation; (iv) that in accordance with sections 3 and 27 of the senior citizens act, the jurisdiction of the civil court would have been barred and the respondent thus had no right to approach the civil court; (v) attention ..... is drawn to sections 18 and 19(f) of the domestic violence act to contend that the petitioner has right therein of claiming alternative residence; (vi) the petitioner herself has stated in the proceedings from which this petition arises that she feels unsafe living in the subject house; and, (vii) that the cm(m) no.1043/2016 and cont. ..... however, time till 15th november, 2017 is granted to the petitioner to vacate the premises on her own and / or to in the said interregnum approach the court under the domestic violence act for necessary relief. ..... of the petitioner has been taking false stands of working elsewhere when in fact he is working at the shop of the respondent; and, (iii) attention in this regard is also drawn to the evidence of the son of the respondent in the domestic violence act proceedings.9. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 26 2017 (HC)

Jagdish Lal Barreja vs.anita Barreja

Court : Delhi

..... against the petitioner for restitution of conjugal rights and the petitioner has filed a complaint against the son of the respondent under the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 (domestic violence act) and in which complaint the petitioner has also sought the relief of alternate accommodation; (iv) that in accordance with sections 3 and 27 of the senior citizens act, the jurisdiction of the civil court would have been barred and the respondent thus had no right to approach the civil court; (v) attention ..... is drawn to sections 18 and 19(f) of the domestic violence act to contend that the petitioner has right therein of claiming alternative residence; (vi) the petitioner herself has stated in the proceedings from which this petition arises that she feels unsafe living in the subject house; and, (vii) that the cm(m) no.1043/2016 and cont. ..... however, time till 15th november, 2017 is granted to the petitioner to vacate the premises on her own and / or to in the said interregnum approach the court under the domestic violence act for necessary relief. ..... of the petitioner has been taking false stands of working elsewhere when in fact he is working at the shop of the respondent; and, (iii) attention in this regard is also drawn to the evidence of the son of the respondent in the domestic violence act proceedings.9. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 2017 (HC)

Vikas Kumar & Ors. Vs.the State & Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... she preferred a petition under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as the dv act ) against the petitioners learned mm, mahila court, karkardooma courts, delhi. ..... they submit that they have come all the way from district sitamarhi, bihar, hence their petition may be considered. ..... ) no.1753/2017 page 3 of 4 already received the gold chain and gold ring from the petitioner no.1. ..... the respondent no.2 submits that she has received the entire settlement amount from the petitioner no.1. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //