Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: protection of women from domestic violence act 2005 Sorted by: old Court: chennai Page 4 of about 59 results (0.143 seconds)

Feb 26 2016 (HC)

P. Kalpana Vs. R. Saravanan @ Arumugam and Others

Court : Chennai

..... given 30 days time from the date of receipt of papers from the registry to file an appeal under section 29 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 before the competent court. ..... instituted m.c.no.2 of 2015 before the learned chief judicial magistrate, erode seeking several reliefs under the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 (hereinafter called 'd.v.act'). ..... committing domestic violence. ..... circumstances, the revision petitioner has to pursue the remedy provided under section 29 of the d.v.act, 2005 namely, court of sessions, erode. 13. ..... which runs as under: 'section 372 no appeal to lie unless otherwise provided: no appeal shall lie from any judgment or order of a criminal court except as provided for by this code or by any other law for the time being in force ..... act, 2005 which runs as under ..... appeal: there shall lie an appeal to the court of sessions within thirty days from the date on which the order made by the magistrate is served on the aggrieved person or the respondent, as the case may be, whichever is ..... thus, an order passed by the chief judicial magistrate under d.v.act will be an order passed by a magistrate within the meaning of section 29 of the said act and it is subject to the appeal remedy provided in section 29 of ..... counsel for the revision petitioner would submit that the learned chief judicial magistrate, erode dismissed the maintenance case by an erroneous order throwing open the rudimentary principles relating to domestic problems. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 24 2016 (HC)

A. Suresh Anto Vs. Anto Teena Mary

Court : Chennai

..... per contra, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent would vehemently contend that in the cases filed under protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005, the learned magistrate has power to pass interim and ex-parte orders and there is no provision available in the said act to set aside the order passed by the learned magistrate under section 23 of the act. ..... the brief facts of the case are as follows:- (i) the respondent as a complainant filed a petition in m.p.no.59 of 2012 under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005, (hereinafter referred to as the act) seeking interim relief of residence order and monetary reliefs per month under section 23(3) of the act. ..... in the above circumstances, it is useful to extract section 23 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 which reads as follows:- "23. ..... since there is no provision available in the domestic violence act, to set aside the ex-parte interim order, the learned x metropolitan magistrate, egmore, chennai, has correctly dismissed the petition as not maintainable. ..... hence, the order passed by the learned x metropolitan magistrate, egmore, chennai, under section 23(3) of the domestic violence act is perfectly valid and it is acceptable. ..... further, on a perusal of the entire provision of the domestic violence act, it is seen that there is no provision available to set aside the interim order or ex-parte order passed under section 23 of the act. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 11 2016 (HC)

Selvarajan Vs. Rengasubathra

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... section 3 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 (d.v. ..... the records relating to the order of the ii additional sessions judge, thoothukudi dated 11.02.2016 in c.a.no.38 of 2015, modifying the order passed by the learned judicial magistrate no.1, kovilpatti in m.c.no.2 of 2013 by order dated 01.07.2015 under protection of women from domestic violence act and set aside the same.) 1. ..... claiming shared residence, compensation, maintenance, return of her srithana articles and also protection from domestic violence, the wife has filed m.c.no.2 of 2013 before the learned judicial magistrate no.i, kovilpatti as against her husband ..... act) explains what is 'domestic violence ..... short, in domestic relationship, domestic violence is analogous to ..... she has admitted that there is no domestic problem between them and because he has filed a divorce case, she considered it a domestic violence. ..... and circumstances of this case, what is complained of is nothing less of domestic violence. ..... domestic violence comprises physical as well ..... even then, if we accept such a contention then every husband will try to escape from his moral and legal obligation to maintain his wife and children simply by saying that ..... husband has no property or he is having a property which is an hell for his wife, section 12 of the act speaks about his duty to provide accommodation to his wife even in a rented premises. ..... the act it is his duty to provide residence to his wife either from his own property or from his joint .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 12 2016 (HC)

Dr.T. Rajasekaran Vs. The Protection Officer, Domestic Violence Act, D ...

Court : Chennai

..... above said circumstances, it is useful to extract section 29 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 which read as follows :- 29. ..... admitted by both sides, cc.no.2463 of 2015 is pending on the file of the x metropolitan magistrate, egmore @ allikulam, chennai for the offences under section 9(b) read with 37(2)(e) of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005. 3. ..... trial court failed to consider the second respondent filed op.no.3877 of 2013, in which no such allegations of domestic violence act was pleaded, the complaint was made after 19years without mentioning any specific date, month, year etc. ..... counsel for the second respondent mainly contended that there is no specific fault in the domestic violence act and filed revision before this court. ..... cc.no.2463 of 2015 is filed under section 37(2)(e) of the domestic violence act. ..... of the above circumstances, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the x metropolitan magistrate, egmore @ allikulam, chennai he has to prefer appeal under section 29 of the domestic violence act. ..... present revision is preferred by the revision petitioner without invoking section 29 of the domestic violence act. ..... the petitioner states that the complaint filed by the respondent dated 05.01.2015 narrating the allegations from the date of marriage namely 29.05.1996 only after the petitioner filing divorce op would show that the complaint was made after 19years without any specific date, month, year etc therefore the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 07 2016 (HC)

S. Arunkumar and Others Vs. G. Menaga

Court : Chennai

(prayer: civil revision petition filed under article 227 of the constitution of india to set aside the administrative order dated 21.11.2012 passed by the learned principal subordinate judge, cuddalore directing the office to number the petition filed by the respondent/petitioner under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 as o.p.no.145 of 2012 and consequently, dismiss the same.) 1. the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this civil revision petition. he also made an endorsement to that effect in the bundle. in view of the same, the civil revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. no costs. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2015 (HC)

A. Manikandan and Another Vs. Manonmani

Court : Chennai

..... a bare perusal of the order under challenge reveals that in passing the order under section 23 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005, no prima facie satisfaction of the petitioner committing or having committed an offence of domestic violence or there being any likelihood of doing so has been recorded. ..... pending such petition, the respondent/wife filed m.p.no.727 of 2014 on the file of learned xvii metropolitan magistrate, saidapet, chennai, u/s.12 of protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005. ..... learned xvii metropolitan magistrate, saidapet, chennai, shall take m.p.no.735 of 2014 in m.p.no.727 of 2014 on file afresh for consideration and dispose of the same after passing a reasoned order within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 26 2016 (HC)

S. Arunagiri Vs. The Additional Director General of Police (Law and Or ...

Court : Chennai

..... of 2014 before the judicial magistrate court no.ii, thanjavur, for various reliefs under the protection of women from domestic violence act. 5. ..... no.5665 of 2015 for a direction to the superintendent of police, thanjavur district, to take departmental action against the deputy superintendent of police, papanasam and poongothai, sub-inspector of police, all women police station, papanasam, for certain alleged misdeeds at the time when puthin was secured. ..... enquiry, it appears that arunagiri, his sister's husband and another relative, came with puthin to all women police station, papanasam and there puthin stated that he does not want to go to arunagiri. ..... deputy superintendent of police, papanasam sub division directed poongothai, sub inspector of police, all women police station, to enquire into the matter and take necessary action. ..... in this incident, the child was not forcefully taken from the custody of the petitioner, as contended by the ..... therefore, poongothai, sub-inspector of police, all women police station, kept puthin in the child welfare home on 30.03.2015 and on 31.03.2015, the child welfare committee was informed and puthin told the member of the child welfare committee that he does not want to go ..... poongothai, women si of police went to ariyalur brought the said arunagiri and his puthin in connection with petition submitted by his wife ..... (the petitioner herein) got married to shobha (the seventh respondent herein) on 23.02.2004 and a son, puthin, was born to them on 30.05.2005. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 01 2015 (HC)

Senbagavalli and Others Vs. Senbagadevi

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... , praying to call for the records relating to m.c.no.29 of 2015 on the file of the judicial magistrate no.i, thanjavur filed by the respondent under section 12 of protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 and quash the same insofar as the petitioners alone.) 1. ..... 29/2015 on the file of the judicial magistrate, no.i, thanjavur, which has been filed for the offences under sections 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24 and 25 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 is pending. ..... the petitioners have come forward with this petition seeking to quash the proceedings in m.c.no.29 of 2015 on the file of the judicial magistrate no.i, thanjavur filed by the respondent under section 12 of protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005. 2. ..... admittedly, the domestic violence case in m.c.no. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 23 2016 (HC)

R. Vairam Vs. V. Thenmozhi

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... further, by way of compromise, thenmozhi has agreed to withdraw all the proceedings initiated under the domestic violence act. 9. ..... in the mean while, thenmozhi filed a petition under domestic violence act as against her husband and in-laws before the learned judicial magistrate, melur. ..... 23(1) of the protection women act, 2005. ..... to withdraw the criminal cases filed as against each on condition of thenmozhi having to be paid rs.10 lakhs, who has also agreed to withdraw the proceedings pending before the learned i additional sessions judge which arose out of the dv act case and the said thenmozhi today present had stated that today her husband side has paid rs.8 lakhs cash. ..... now, instead of waiting for the solution from the court, they themselves find out some solution. ..... on the complaint of thenmozhi, the all women police station, manamadurai, sivagangai district registered a case in crime no.24 of 2015 for offence under section 498(a) i.p.c. ..... act. ..... and section 4 of tnphw act. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 15 2015 (HC)

Jeyanthi Vs. Jeyapaul

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... violence in domestic relationship, the aggrieved party, namely, the wife filed a complaint against the husband under section 12 of protection of women from domestic violence act (hereinafter referred to as the p.w.d.v.act ..... the provisions of domestic violence act can be used as a shield / sword to get protection from the domestic violence and it cannot be used as a sword for the purpose of causing violence to the other partner in the life ..... deprivation of economic resources and prohibition as defined under section 3 (iv) of the domestic violence act comes within the purview of domestic violence (k.ramaraju vs. ..... to meet the expenses incurred and losses suffered by the aggrieved person and any child of the aggrieved person as a result of the domestic violence and such relief may include, but not limited to,- (a) the loss of earnings; (b) the medical expenses; (c) the loss caused due to the destruction, damage or removal of any property from the control of the aggrieved person; and (d) the maintenance for the aggrieved person as well as her children, if any, including ..... word domestic violence has been defined in the p.w.d.v.act, 2005. ..... the wife filed a petition under section 12 of the p.w.d.v.act, 2005, seeking the following reliefs: i) to pass protection order prohibiting the respondent from committing any act of domestic violence either physically or mentally against her and daughter; ii) to pass a residence order, making provision for residence at the house, where the petitioner was .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //