Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: protection of women from domestic violence act 2005 Court: punjab and haryana Page 9 of about 117 results (0.179 seconds)

Sep 03 2013 (HC)

Madan Lal Katyal and Another Vs. Mela Ram Malhotra

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... false fir was got registered against the complainant and his son by pooja malhotra, daughter of the petitioners.pooja malhotra had also filed a complaint under the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 against the complainant and his son ashish malhotra on 11.02.2008. ..... when the complainant and his son ashish malhotra tried to stop the petitioners from doing so, they manhandled the complainant and his son. ..... under sections 323, 452, 506, 382 read with sections 511 and 34 of the indian penal code, 1860 from the court of panchkula to any court of competent jurisdiction at karnal. ..... keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, no ground for transfer of the complaint from the court at panchkula to karnal is made out. ..... as a result of this, complainant filed a suit for mandatory injunction to get the firs.floor of his house vacated from his son ashish malhotra. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 27 2013 (HC)

Present: Mr. Bhupinder Banga Advocate Vs. Manu Dutt Bhardwaj

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... the trial court while taking into consideration the increase in salary of the petitioner-wife as admitted by her in the statement made in the proceedings under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 has reduced the maintenance pendente lite, but the court has not taken into consideration the rise in prices, day-to- day cost of living and expenses which are to be borne by the petitioner on education of the ..... dated 12.10.2009 whereby petitioner-wife was awarded maintenance pendente lite to the tune of ` 5,000/- per month, is restored, with the modification that the said amount shall be paid from the date of filing of application under section 24 of the act instead the date of passing of order i.e.12.10.2009. ..... brief facts of the case are that the petitioner-wife filed application under section 13 of the hindu marriage act (in short the act').during the pendency of the said petition, an application under section 24 of the act was filed by the petitioner. ..... pendente lite has been reduced from ` 5,000/- to ` 4,000/-. ..... the deficient amount shall be paid by the respondent within three months from today. ..... thereafter, vide impugned order, on the application moved by the respondent-husband for rescinding the order dated 12.10.2009, the maintenance pendente lite has been reduced to ` 4000/- from ` 5000/-. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 30 2013 (HC)

Mandeep Kaur Vs.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... it is alleged that the petitioner is residing separately at her parental home at jalandhar, where she has filed two proceedings namely (i) fir under sections 406/498-a ipc and (ii) petition under ta 546/2012 (o&m) #2# section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005. ..... in view of the above, the present petition is allowed, the petition under section 9 of the act titled parminder singh versus mandeep kaur from the courts at mukerian, district hoshiarpur is ordered to be withdrawn and transferred to the district courts, jalandhar for disposal in accordance with law from the stage of withdrawal. ..... ) for restitution of conjugal right, titled parminder singh versus mandeep kaur from the courts at mukerian to the court of competent jurisdiction at jalandhar. ..... it is further stated that in order to harass the petitioner-wife, the respondent husband filed a petition under section 9 of the act which, as noticed above, is pending in the court of learned addl. ..... that the petitioner is employed as ett teacher serving in a govt school at jalandhar and in these circumstances, it is difficult for her to attend the proceedings initiated by the respondent husband at mukerian, district hoshiarpur which is about 60 kms away from jalandhar. ..... jaswant singh,j(oral).petitioner wife has filed the present transfer application under section 24 cpc for the transfer of petition filed by respondent husband under section 9 of the hindu marriage act,1955 (for short the act . .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 19 2013 (HC)

Petitioner Wife Has Filed the Present Transfer Application Under Vs. D ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... it is averred that petitioner-wife has filed proceedings under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 as well as under section 125 of the cr.pc for grant of maintenance for herself and for the minot daughter at karnal. ..... it is further averred that it is very difficult for the petitioner- wife to pursue her case at jind which is at a distance of 90-100 kms from karnal as there being no male member to accompany her to jind. ..... (oral) petitioner wife has filed the present transfer application under section 24 of the code of civil procedure for the transfer of divorce proceedings under section 13 of the hindu marriage act, 1955 initiated by respondent-husband titled as devender singh versus manju . ..... in view of the above, the present petition is allowed, the petition under section 13 of the hindu marriage act, 1955 titled as devender singh versus manju . ..... pending in the court at jind is ordered to be withdrawn and transferred to courts of competent jurisdiction at karnal for disposal in accordance with law from the stage of withdrawal. ..... to harass the petitioner-wife and as a counter blast, respondent mahajan vinay 2013.07.20 14:33 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document at chandigarh ta no.84 of 2013(o&m) #2# husband has filed the proceedings under section 13 of the hindu marriage act at jind. ..... from the court at district jind to the court of competent jurisdiction at karnal. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 15 2014 (HC)

Present : Mr. O.P. Goyal Senior Advocate Vs. Dinkar Saini

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... the petitioner filed an application under the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 praying for shared residence at her matrimonial home. ..... the ground relating inasmuch as she had admitted that she had been residing at her singh parvinder 2014.01.22 16:22 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document criminal revision no.1960 of 2011 (o&m) 5 parents house right from the year 2008, the petitioner is not entitled to shared accommodation in the matrimonial home. 5. ..... she had also not set up a plea that she and her children were thrown away from the matrimonial home by the husband in the year 2008. ..... the application is filed praying to stay the dispossession of the petitioner from house no.2, gali no.20, krishna colony, sehatpur extension, faridabad. ..... crm no.41243 of 2013 exemption is granted from filing the typed-written copies of annexures p-1 to p-5 and p-7. ..... i find that there is no merit in the submission, inasmuch as it is the concrete stand of the petitioner that she has been residing at her parents house right from the year 2008. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 05 2014 (HC)

Ajit Singh Vs. Sukhwant Kaur

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... the respondent denied the allegations of the appellant and stated that the petition was a counter blast to a complaint filed by her under sections 18 to 22 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005.5. ..... the present appeal has been filed by appellant-husband against the judgment and decree dated 11.9.2013, whereby the petition filed under section 13 of the hindu marriage act (hereinafter called the act) by the appellant was dismissed.3. ..... he had singh ishwar 2014.02.11 04:33 i attest to the accuracy of this order high court chandigarh fao no.m-393 of 2013 (o&m) {2} earlier filed a petition under section 9 of the act, which was dismissed in default. ..... even otherwise, marriage took place in 1984 and it has also come on record that the appellant retired from service on 31.5.1993. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 10 2014 (HC)

Deen Dayal and Another Vs. Veena Sharma

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... was wife of deceased son of the petitioners.who filed the complaint against the gulati vineet 2014.03.06 12:41 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh crr no.2161 of 2011 -2- petitioners under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence, act 2005 and that complaint was allowed. ..... judgment dated 05.02.2011, passed by learned chief judicial magistrate, jind has been partly allowed setting aside the judgment qua payment of `3,000/- per month as maintenance but the judgment regarding restraining the petitioners from alienating the house and from dispossessing the complainant therefrom was maintained. ..... after the retirement, he is living in a rented accommodation at panchkula and drawing a meager pension of `7,000/- per month after deduction of loan amount installments and he is suffering from heart disease. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 04 2014 (HC)

Present: Mr.Raj Kumar Gupta Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... subsequent thereto, the petitioner in the year 2008 filed a complaint under protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 (in short 'the act') against her parents in-law and others which is pending in the court of judicial magistrate at amritsar. ..... the complainant on his visit to amritsar on 08.01.2009 went to the shop and found the material missing and on inquiry from his son, the complainant was pushed out of the shop and extended threats to kill him. ..... the petitioner has initiated proceedings under sections 12, 18, 19, 20 and 21 of the act arraigning her parents in-law along with vinay goel and seema goel as respondents which are statedly pending in the court. ..... when he inquired about the same from his son telephonically, he (son) threatened to kill him in case he visits the shop. ..... offences and she has been indicted in the crime because of dispute between her father-in- law on one hand and her husband on the other and more so that the petitioner initiated proceedings under the act. ..... allegations against the petitioner making her jointly liable for alleged misappropriation of those stocks by her husband as the petitioner earlier initiated criminal proceedings in the year 2002 and later filed a petition under the act. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 22 2014 (HC)

Present: Mr.Sunil Chadha Senior Advocate with Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... filed by the complainant against the petitioner and his parents & sister u/ss 12, 18, 19, arvind kumar sharma 2014.05.22 16:26 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh crm no.m-34081 of 2012 3 20, 22 and 23 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005, containing similar allegations, is also pending in the court of jmic. ..... a swift car, household articles, two ring, weighing 450 grams and 600 grams, have already been recovered by the police from the petitioner on 25.5.2012, during the pendency of petition for anticipatory bail before additional sessions judge. ..... in the light of aforesaid reasons, taking into consideration the totality of the facts & circumstances, emanating from the record, as discussed here-in-before and without commenting further anything on merits lest it may prejudice the case of either side during the course of trial of main case, the instant petition for ..... at the very outset, the learned state counsel, on instructions from asi kashmir singh, has acknowledged the relevant factual matrix and submitted that the petitioner has already joined the investigation & he is no longer required for further interrogation ..... another aspect of the matter, which can be viewed entirely from a different angle. ..... as is evident from the record that the marriage of complainant rajeev kaler, advocate, daughter of ajmer lal kaler, was solemnized with the petitioner on 29.11.2009 according to hindu rites & ceremonies at sohal shahnai resort, gt road, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 2012 (HC)

Satish Kumar Malhotra and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... .under the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 and divorce petition have also been filed ..... accused persons stayed at karnal at the house of the parents of the complainant and they stated that they have given the flat and cash in fdr to her daughter accused no.4 and also raised the demand from the parents of the complainant to give a flat in the shape of dowry but the father of the complainant shown his inability to give flat in a dowry to the accused persons and thereafter the accused ..... drew my attention to the last five lines of page no.86 of the fir (annexure p8) and has submitted that this act has been committed by the petitioners at karnal and this gives cause of action to the complainant to lodge the fir at ..... him, none of the petitioners either visited karnal with her to commit any act which may attract the offence for which the present fir has been lodged. ..... further submitted that the complainant is still in occupation of the basement portion of the house and for getting that portion vacated from the complainant, her father-in-law filed a suit for her eviction. ..... on such a visit, which was on the way to delhi from pehowa, harassing by way of taunting, nagging etc.cannot be believed ..... the complainant expressed his inability to give flat by way of dowry and thereafter the accused persons again started harassing the complainant by taunting, nagging etc.it could be believed that the accused while returning from pehowa could stay at the parental home of the complainant. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //