Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
..... can be filed only under seeds act and not under consumer protection act, the honble supreme court of india held that seeds act is totally silent on the issue of payment of compensation for the loss of crop on account of use of defective seeds and that any attempt to exclude farmers from the ambit of consumer protection act by implication will make that act vulnerable to an attack of unconstitutionality on the ground of discrimination and that it is not possible ..... by seeing the photographs filed by the complainant it is not possible to assess the plant crop position, variety and age of the crop, so also the crop management of the entire field because a selective parts of ..... and that the complainant did not establish with any convincing material that showed the seeds within the specified time and that he purchased and used fertilizers or pesticides and followed better crop management and that getting of good yield of crop depends not only on good seeds but also on other agricultural operations and management such as nature of land, proper preparation of land, fertilization, pests and ..... officer concerned he did not take any care and action and that on account of deficient service rendered by ops 1 and 2 he sustained loss of rs.80,000/- and ..... )of c p act and ought to have invoke section 13(iv ) (iii) of c p act to consider the complainants case and thus prayed to allow the appeal, set aside the impugned order and consequently to allow ..... correct perspection and arrived at right conclusion in .....
Tag this Judgment!