Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: protection of human rights act 1993 section 15 statement made by persons to the commission Court: delhi Page 10 of about 477 results (0.143 seconds)

Ramnish and Another Vs. CBI and Others

Court : Delhi

..... by those in power. this court has in several pronouncements expressed grave concern over the insensitivity of state authorities in protecting the basic rights of citizens and even gone to the extent of laying down principles that would bind such authorities to act humanely in situations that keep recurring of these decisions, cases dealing with custodial violence stand out in bold relief where ..... , they have a more pernicious effect in that they tend to erode the rule of law, violate fundamental rights and shake the faith and the confidence of the people in the efficacy and the credibility of the institutions that are meant to protect the citizens against them and eventually lead to catastrophic results like anarchy and the return of dark days of .....

Delhi Development Authority Vs. Omvati Kalshan

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [2008(116)FLR10]; (2008)IILLJ407Del

..... '` limitation. as will be pointed out hereafter, the constitutional obligation of non-discrimination, now widely accepted as a universal characteristic of the basic human right to equality, nevertheless remained, de-hors the act, on the date that the petitioner made her representation first and continued even on the date ..... assistant/secretary. the petitioner, inter alia, relied on article 14 of the constitution and section 47 of the persons with disabilities (equal opportunities, protection of rights and full participation) act, 1995 (hereinafter referred to as the 'act'). section 47 of the said act reads as follows:47. non-discrimination ..... to enact a suitable legislation to provide for the following: (i) to spell out the responsibility of the state towards the prevention of disabilities, protection of rights, provision of medical care, education, training, employment and rehabilitation of persons with disabilities; (ii) to create barrier free environment for persons with disabilities .....

Chetan Sharma vs.state & Another

Court : Delhi

..... seeks to protect the persons of their lives and personal liberties except according to the procedure established by law. the said article in its broad application not only takes within its fold enforcement of the rights of an accused but also the rights of the victim. the state has a duty to enforce the human rights of a ..... citizen providing for fair and impartial investigation against any person accused of commission of a cognizable offence, which may include its own officers. in certain situations even a witness to the crime may seek for and shall be granted protection by the state. (iii) in ..... the protectors of civil liberties of the citizens, this court and the high courts have not only the power and jurisdiction but also an obligation to protect the fundamental rights, guaranteed by part iii in general and under article 21 of the constitution in particular, zealously and vigilantly. (emphasis supplied) the supreme court has cautioned .....

S.V.S. Raghuvanshi Vs. National Seeds Corporation Ltd. and anr.

Court : Delhi

..... to interests and considerations. thirdly, even the heightened scrutiny test developed in r v.ministry of defence, ex p smith [1996] qb 517.554 is not necessarily appropriate to the protection of human rights.5. in the case of sheel kumar roy vs. secretary, ministry of defence & ors. (supra) reliance is placed upon para 17 and which reads as under: fairness and reasonableness ..... in the same way whichever approach is adopted. but the intensity of review is somewhat greater under the proportionality approach. making due allowance for important structural differences between various convention rights, which i do not propose to discuss, a few generalisations are perhaps permissible. i would mention three concrete differences without suggesting that my statement is exhaustive. first, the doctrine of .....

The Tibetan Childrens Village School vs.karma Lama & Anr

Court : Delhi

..... to france. 30 on 17.01.2013, an order was passed by the ncpcr. this was on a complaint made by respondents no.1 & 2 regarding the protection of the rights of master tenzin. in this complaint, it was brought to the notice of the ncpcr that master tenzin had been permitted by the petitioner to c.m. ( ..... delhi without informing their whereabouts to the petitioner. 5 on 17.01.2013, the petitioner learnt that respondents no.1 & 2 had approached the national commission for protection of child rights (ncpcr) and had obtained an ex-parte order restraining the child from being forcibly taken to france or any place outside india. 6 on 22.01.2013, ..... ) as also the guidelines issued by the ministry of women and child development, 2011 (hereinafter referred to as the cara ) had been ignored; the hague convention on protection of children and cooperation in respect of inter-country adoption, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as the hague convention) was also taken into account. 10 this petition has been filed .....

Youtube Llc & Anr. Vs.geeta Shroff

Court : Delhi

..... for the fear of a foreign lawsuit. (4) the threat of the libel laws of some foreign countries is so dramatic that the united nations human rights committee examined the issue and indicated that in some instances the law of libel has served to discourage critical media reporting on matters of serious public interest ..... of the internet civil framework provides that, in any operation for collection, storage and treatment of records of personal data, the brazilian law and the rights to privacy, protection of personal data and confidentiality of private communications and records must be complied with, provided that at least one of the terminals is located in brazil. ..... united states persons within their courts, and foreign libel judgments inconsistent fao no.93 of 2018 page 8 of 17 with united states increasingly common first amendment protections are 9. section 3 of the said act which deals with recognition of foreign defamation judgments, in particular 4102 clause (c) reads as under: .(c .....

Su-Kam Power Systems Ltd. Vs.mr. Kunwer Sachdev & Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... the cpr is to enable the court to deal with cases justly: rule 1.1. to adopt the language of article 6(1) of the european convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms with which this aim is consistent, the court must ensure that there is a fair trial. it must seek to give effect to the overriding objective when ..... conduct or by representation or by holding out ostensible authority.19. estoppel, then, may itself be the foundation of a right as against the person estopped, and indeed, if it were not so, it is difficult to see what protection the principle of estoppel can afford to the person by whom it may be invoked or what disability it can create ..... in connection with the goods in respect of which it is registered and if there is any invasion of this right by any other person using a mark which is the same or deceptively similar to his trade mark, he can protect his trade mark by an action for infringement in which he can obtain injunction, damages or an account of .....

Samridhi Devi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 125(2005)DLT284; 2006(3)SLJ225(Delhi)

..... held that a statutory order, and the anti-terrorism, crime and security act, 2001 were incompatible with the provisions of the european convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms.29. the decided case and authorities point to the use of the proportionality test as an element enabling judicial review, of an ..... us 57. australia has enacted the sex discrimination act 1984; the united kingdom enacted the sex discrimination act, 1975, and also framed the sexual discrimination and employment protection (remedies) regulations, 1993. all these measures are functional, and there is considerable body of case-law on various nuances of the issues.34. the courts, ..... subjected to sexual harassment at the workplace, yet, action can be maintained by her to enjoin the employer, to create a workplace free from hostility, and ensure protection from sexual harassment or abuse (fisher v. san pedro peninsula hospital 1989 [214] ca 590; mogilefsly v. superior court 1993 [20] ca 1409. such .....

Coastal Marine Construction and Engineering Limited & Anr vs.indian Oi ...

Court : Delhi

..... interests and considerations. thirdly, even the heightened scrutiny test developed in r v ministry of defence, ex p smith [1996]. qb517 554 is not necessarily appropriate to the protection of human rights. 67. the supreme court in state of u.p. v. sheo shanker lal srivastava:2006. scc (l&s) 521 referred to the decision of house of lords ..... 2.1, 2.3 and 5 of the blacklisting guidelines, which are set out below:-" 2.1 the purpose of putting a party on holiday list is to protect the corporation from dealing with an undesirable party. reason for putting a party on w.p.(c) 5525/2018 page 20 of 41 holiday list may include any ..... the disputes raised by the petitioner were not arbitrable is merited. accordingly, by a letter dated 07.05.2018, the petitioner withdrew its invocation notice while reserving its right to seek relief in respect of wrongful termination before an appropriate forum. submissions:30. mr c.s. vaidyanathan, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners contended that the .....

r.k. Shivdasani vs.union of India and Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... eia/eia employees service, appeal and control rules 21. national by commission for women act 1990 and guidelines/ instructions issued national commission for women on sexual harassment protection of human rights commission act 1993 22.23. mha notification no.1establishment (a) dt. 20.11.54 regarding interpretation of rule 23 eia/ eia national commission for women, deen ..... the office as well as to the president of delhi region export inspection employees association, new delhi vide our letter dated 3.2.1999, in order to protect the dignity and escape from victimisation. she also stated therein that ,sls kcn oks dbz ckj dg pqds gs vksj tks mugksaus nwljs v yhy kcn cksys ..... witnesses. (viii) in such circumstances, the io was not justified in closing the inquiry on 3rd july, 2001, denying, in the process, to the petitioner, his right to produce defence witnesses and cross- examine the prosecution witnesses. (ix) there was no explanation for how mr. r. n. prasad, who was posted in another building .....