Proscription - Judgment Search Results

Rambhat Agnihotri Vs. the Collector of Puna

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1877)ILR1Bom592

kemball j 1 the plaintiff brought this suit to recover possession of 4 800 bighorn of land forming the kolhati...

Rathinavelu Mudaliar and anr. Vs. Kolandavelu Pillai

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1906)ILR29Mad511

sankaran nair j 1 the defendant is the appellant it is found by the lower courts that the appellants s...

Karuthan Chetty and ors. Vs. Kalimuthan Alias Vellayan and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1911)ILR34Mad323

arnold white c j 1 in this case the plaintiffs are inhabitants of a villaga called nemathampatty and the defendants...

R Vs. Z (Appellant) (on Appeal from the Court of Appeal in Northern Ir ...

Court: House of Lords

..... had previously operated separately for northern ireland and great britain and also to extend the proscription regimes to terrorist organisations at home or abroad not involved in northern irish related ..... judgment mr macdonald realistically accepted that the real ira is a terrorist organisation deserving of proscription and that the intention of parliament was that it should be proscribed but he .....

Pang Ah San Vs. Singapore Medical Council

Court: Singapore Supreme Court

..... treat patients according to generally accepted methods emphasis added what then follows is a general proscription against offering management plans or remedies that are not generally accepted by the profession ..... treatment is considered therapy and not research that will be exempted from the general proscription against remedies that are not generally accepted by the profession in paragraph 1 of .....

Sec Vs. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... nothing to indicate an intent to alter the fundamental purposes of the legislation the broad proscription against any practice which operates as a fraud or deceit upon any client or prospective ..... u s 199 any practice which operates as a fraud or deceit deemed a specific proscription against nondisclosure surplusage respondents also argue that the 1960 amendment footnote 53 to the investment .....

Jefferson Cty. Pharm. Ass'n Vs. Abbott Labs.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and a county hospital pharmacy petitioner alleged that respondent manufacturers violated the price discrimination proscriptions of the robinson patman act by selling their products to respondent hospital pharmacies ..... hospitals for resale in competition with private retail pharmacies is exempt from the proscriptions of the robinson patman act i petitioner a trade association of retail pharmacists .....

Securities Indus. Assn. Vs. Frs

Court: US Supreme Court

..... also a security despite differences in language moreover 16 and 21 are coextensive in their proscriptions of commercial banks securities activities the two provisions approach the same problem from different ..... investment instrument but as an instrument that commercial banks may purchase without regard to the proscriptions of the glass steagall act thus the board s placing of commercial paper in .....

Broadrick Vs. Oklahoma

Court: US Supreme Court

..... because of his political opinions or affiliations responsibility for maintaining and enforcing 818 s proscriptions is vested in the state personnel board and the state personnel director who ..... general without question the conduct appellants have been charged with falls squarely within these proscriptions appellants assert that 818 goes much farther than these prohibitions according to appellants the .....

Furman Vs. Georgia

Court: US Supreme Court

..... that the reach of the clause was not limited to the proscription of unspeakable atrocities nor did they intend simply to forbid ..... contrary for livermore specifically mentioned death as a candidate for future proscription under the clause see supra at 408 u s 262 ..... he knows not what discriminations may be established against him what proscriptions may be directed against him and when and for what .....