Problematic - Judgment Search Results

Indian Shaving Products Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1999)(107)ELT546TriDel

1 the ld commissioner customs icd tughlakabad new delhi in the impugned order held 9 the imported goods of the...

G. Mallikarjunsiddeshwarappa and anr. Vs. Shamanur Shivashankarappa an ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR1999Kant241; ILR1999KAR908

..... pleadings must be very clear and cogent and that they must if there are any problematic situations present reconcile the position to the satisfaction of the court in the pleadings in .....

Venkatagiriyappa Vs. Karnataka Electricity Board, Bangalore and Others

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 1999(4)KarLJ482

..... noticed in various parts of the state that the extraction of ground water was becoming problematic and water table was declining in many parts of the state it is further submitted .....

Cce Vs. Shanthala Ductile and Grey Iron

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (1999)(80)LC803Tri(Bang.)alore

..... object of a reference is to get a decision from the high court on a problematic or debatable questions and not on a dubious and simple point of law although some .....

Cce Vs. Jam Pipes

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (1999)(80)LC782Tri(Bang.)alore

..... object of a reference is to get a decision from the high court on a problematic or debatable questions and not on a dubious and simple point of law although somehow .....

Baker Vs. General Motors Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... credit principles which render the majority s extended analysis unnecessary and with all due respect problematic in some degree this separate opinion explains my approach i the majority of course is .....

B.V. Sivaiah and ors. Etc. Vs. K. Addankl Babu and ors. Etc.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1998VAD(SC)533; AIR1998SC2565; JT1998(5)SC96; 1998LabIC2749; (1999)ILLJ754SC; 1998(4)SCALE182; (1998)6SCC720; [1998]3SCR782; 1999(1)SLJ257(SC)

..... a matter of course and that if seniority cum merit is the rule promotion is problematical sir the relevant rule governing promotion the post of deputy secretary had not be placed ..... a matter of course and that if seniority cum merit is the rule promotion is problematical this judgment in our opinion does not make a departure from the law laid down .....