Court : Punjab and Haryana
CRA No.1266-SB o1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRA No.1266-SB of 2001 Date of Decision:-23.7.2013 Kartar Singh & Anr. ...Appellants Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present:- Mr.R.S.Rangpuri, Advocate for the appellants. Mr.R.P.S.Sidhu, A.A.G. Punjab for the respondent. Mehinder Singh Sullar, J.The challenge in this appeal preferred by appellants-convicts Kartar Singh son of Sulakhan Singh & Bohar Singh son of Sadha Singh (for brevity the appellants.), is to the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 6.10.2001, by virtue of which, they were convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment (for short RI.) for a period of one year, to pay a fine of ` 2000/- each and in default thereof to further undergo RI for a period of one month each for contravention of the provisions of The Fertilizer (Control) Order, 1985, punishable under section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (here...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV. P. 124/2005 with Crl.M.A.2181-2182/2005 Date of Decision: 10 .02.2012 DILBAGH SINGH ...... Appellant Through: Mr. J.P. Dhanda, Adv. with Mr. N.A. Usmani, Advocate Versus SARDARE and ORS ...... Respondents Through: Mr. I.A. Alvi, Adv. for R-1 to R-5 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J..1. This is a revision petition under Section 397 Cr.P.C. read with section 401 Cr.P.C. assailing the Judgment and Order dated 25.01.2005 passed in S.C. No. 137/2004 by the Ld. ASJ whereby the respondent no. 1, 2 and 3 were released on probation and respondents no.4. and 5 were acquitted..2. The case of the prosecution in brief was that on 7.7.2000 at about 6pm the petitioner Dilbagh Singh and his father Amar Singh were resting in their fields in village Nangal Thakran beneath a jaal tree. Thereafter respondent no.1. Sardare and his two sons, namely Kasim Ali and Hasim Ali reached there and started cutting the jaal tree, to which the petitio...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1974WLN(UC)213
B.P. Beri, C.J.1. This is an application in revision against the judgment of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bharatpur dated June 23, 1971, whereby he has given the benefit of the Probation of Offenders Act to the petitioner Radhey, Dharmi, Sitaram and Khilli and ordered them to by released on executing bonds of Rs. 2,000/- each for keeping the peace for a period of 2 years, but he ordered petitioners Ramjilal and Yadram to undergo 6 months' rigorous imprisonment Under Section 325 I.P.C. 3 months' rigorous imprisonment Under Section 325 and 149 I.P.C. and 2 months' rigorous imprisonment Under Section 147 I.P.C. and maintained various amounts of fine.2. The circumstances, which I need notice for the disposal of this application briefly stated, are these. Panchia kept Mst. Chandra Kala, alleged to be an abducted woman and not belonging to his caste in his house. The accused persons, who were his neighbours, resented this unconventional behaviour on the part of Panchia and it was o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR4640
N.A. Britto, J.1. Heard Shri C. A. Ferreira, learned Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Appellant and Shri Mike Mehta, learned Counsel on behalf of the Respondent/accused.2. These appeals can be conveniently disposed of by this common judgment.3. The Second Appeal is directed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 363 IPC, and, the First Appeal is directed against the sentence imposed upon the accused under Section 8(2) of the Goa Children's Act, 2003 (Act, for short) i.e. the accused has been dealt with under Section 4(1) and 5 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, (P.O. Act, for short).4. The case of the prosecution is that the respondent accused on or about 21.12.2006 at about 8.15 hours at Green Park Junction at Guirim, kidnapped the victim boy i.e. to say PW2 from the lawful guardianship and thereafter committed sexual abuse on him, thereby committing offences punishable under Section 363 of IPC and Section 8(2) of the Act.5. The case of the accused is that on that ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal
Alok Singh, J.1. Mr. Rajendra Kotiyal, learned Counsel for the revisionist.2. Mr. Nandan Arya, learned AGA for the State of Uttarakhand.3. Since both the revisions are arising from one and common judgment passed by Trial Court and Appellate Court, hence, both the revisions are being taken up for hearing together and are being decided by this common Judgment.4. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.5. Brief facts of the present case are that one detenue -Surendra Singh was directed to be taken to Government Hospital, Gopeshwar for medical examination on 28.01.1994 by both the revisionists (accused). Both the accused revisionists took the custody on 28.01.1994 and took him along to District Government Hospital. However, in the intervening night of 28.01.1994 and 29.01.1994 Surendra Singh escaped from the custody of both the accused. Hence, report was lodged against both the accused on 29.01.1994. Superintendent of Police, Chamoli granted permission/sanction to prosecute the accused as pe...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 271/2005 % Judgment dated 11.12.2013 AMAN GROVER Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Raman Rai Handa, Advocate versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Feroz Khan Ghazi, Adv. for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Challenge in this appeal filed under Section 374(2) of the Cr.P.C. is to the judgment of the trial court dated 4.3.2005 and order on sentence dated 5.3.2005, whereby the appellant has been convicted to undergo RI for six months for the offence punishable under Section 411 IPC and pay fine of Rs.1,000/- in default of payment of fine SI for 15 days.2. Brief facts of the case as noticed by the trial court are that: On receipt of DD No.2A dated 2.11.03 SI. K.K. Mishra along with Baney Singh reached the place of occurrence where PCR Van Z71was present and its in-charge produced Complainant Ombir Singh before them. The said Ombir Singh stated that he works at an Export factory in Kirti Nagar and on ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl.Rev.P. No. 281/2005 Date of Decision:10.02.2012 DHARMENDER ...... Petitioner Through: Mr.S.P.Sharma, Advocate Versus THE STATE OF NCT DELHI ...... Respondent Through: Ms.Fizani Husain, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J..1. The petitioner has moved this court under Section 397 read with Section 401 Cr.P.C. He is aggrieved by an order passed by the Ld. ASJ on 2.04.2005 in Criminal Appeal No. 17/2005. Vide this order the Ld. ASJ confirmed the order of Metropolitan Magistrate, sentencing the petitioner to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three months with a fine of Rs. 500/- under Section 279 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year with a fine of Rs. 3000/- under Section 304 -A IPC..2. The facts of the case in brief are that on 5.11.98 the petitioner was driving bus bearing registration no.DL-1PA-1767 from Uttam Nagar and when the bus reached at main Raja Garden chowk, the petitioner hit a cycl...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Himachal Pradesh
DEV DARSHAN SUD, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner challenges his conviction for offence under Section 354 IPC for assaulting, molesting and outraging the modesty of the prosecutrix, who at the relevant time was a student of 10th class. 2. The prosecution case was that on 15.1.2004 she was going to school. At around 8 AM in the morning when she reached the jungle near Kaligarh, she noticed that the accused was stalking her. He overtook her and stopped her after some distance. Thereafter he caught hold of the prosecutrix from both arms and pushed her to the ground. She tried to save herself and in the struggle her clothes especially her sweater was torn. She shouted for help but the petitioner gagged her mouth. She extricated his hand from her mouth after a brief struggle and shouted for help. Upon this, Lali Devi, who was cutting fuel wood at some distance, came and rescued her from the clutches of the petitioner. 3. The learned trial Court on the evidence on record convicted the petitioner ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on : November 01, 2019 Decided on : December 03, 2019 Crl. Appeal No.187/2018 RAJ KUMAR STATE .... Appellant Through: Mr. Sharad Malhotra, Adv. for DHCLSC. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State with ASI Ram Vilas, PS Pahar Ganj. Mr. Sarfraz Khan, Adv. for DSLSA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER1 This criminal appeal assailing conviction on charge of rape, notwithstanding the testimony of the prosecutrix conceding the relationship to be consensual, has led to revelation of a pattern of irresponsible exercise of jurisdiction vis--vis victim compensation scheme necessitating measures to be taken so as to curb misuse of public money.2. The appellant was brought to trial in the court of Sessions (case no.28940/2016) in the wake of report (charge-sheet) under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.PC) dated 23.08.2016 submitted by the Station House Officer (SHO) of police stat...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
Reported in : 1996CriLJ1259; 1995(II)OLR260
R.K. Dash, J. 1. The accused, petitioner herein, stood charged under Sections 307 and 324, IPC. Upon trial, the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Athagarh, convicted and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six years for the offence under Section 307, IPC and one year for the offence under Section 324, IPC and ordered both the sentences to run concurrently. The accused then challenged the judgment and order of the Assistant Sessions Judge in appeal and upon hearing the learned First Additional Sessions Judge, Cuttack, while setting aside the conviction under Section 307, IPC upheld the conviction under Section 324 and reduced the sentence to rigorous imprisonment for five months. It is against this judgment the accused has preferred the present revision.2. Facts of the case lie in a narrow compass. On 5-11-1989 at about 3 p.m. PW 1 Rajkishore Rout and his brother Chandra Sekhar Rout, PW 9 while returning from Nuapatna Spinning Mill, the accused obstructed them near Chandi...
Tag this Judgment!