Court : Karnataka
- 1 - R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE14H DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. RITU RAJ AWASTHI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNA S. DIXIT WRIT PETITION No.18703/2021 (GM-POLICE) C/W WRIT PETITION NOS.18729/2021, 18732/2021, 18733/2021, 18738/2021, 18803/2021, 18942/2021, 19241/2021, 19271/2021, 19322/2021, 19450/2021, 22371/2021 (GM-POLICE) IN W.P.NO.18703/2021: BETWEEN: ALL INDIA GAMING FEDERATION A SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT1860REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY AND AUTHORISED SIGNATORY MR SUNIL KRISHNAMURTHY HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT TIFFANY, 1ST FLOOR, HIRANANDANI ROAD, HIRANANDANI ESTATE, GHODBUNDER ROAD, PATILPADA, THANE WEST, MAHARSHTRA -400 607. PETITIONER (BY SRI.C ARYAMA SUNDARAM, SENIOR COUNSEL A/W SRI. PRADEEP NAYAK,ADVOCATE MS. ANUPAMA HEBBAR,ADVOCATE SRI. SANKEERTH VITTAL, ADVOCATE , SRI. SIDDHARTH AIYANNA, ADVOCATE SRI. DHEERAJ MURTHY, ADVOCATE MS. ROHINI MUSA, ADVOCATE SRI. VIDUSHP...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.71 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.7723 of 2019) Union of India & Anr. .... Appellant(s) Versus Shaikh Istiyaq Ahmed & Ors. . Respondent (s) JUDGMENT L. NAGESWARA RAO, J.Leave granted.1. The Respondent was convicted by the Supreme Court of Mauritius under Section 30(1)(f)(II), 47(2) and 5(2) of the Dangerous Drugs Act for possession of 152.8 grams of heroin and was sentenced to imprisonment for 26 years. He was transferred to India as per the Repatriation of Prisoners Act, 2003 (hereinafter, the 2003 Act) on 04.03.2016. He preferred a representation under Section 13 (6) of the 2003 Act and requested for scaling down the sentence to 10 years as per Section 21 (b) of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1994 (hereinafter, NDPS Act). In the same 1 | Pa ge representation, he also requested that the sentence that he has already undergone in Mauritius may be taken into account fo...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1113 OF2021(ARISING OUT OF PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRIMINAL) NO.5618 OF2021 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR. RESPONDENT(S) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1114 OF2021(ARISING OUT OF PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRIMINAL) NO.3949 of 2021) JUDGMENT ANIRUDDHA BOSE, J.Leave Granted 2. These two petitions for Special Leave to Appeal, now appeals on grant of leave, have been listed as connected matters and heard by us as such. A learned Single Judge of the Rajasthan High Court in an order passed on 31st March, 2020, 1 from which SLP (Crl.) No.5618 of 2021 originated, had directed the Registrar (Judicial) of the High Court to not to list bails, appeals, applications for suspension of sentence in appeals and revisions in the category of extreme urgent matters. We shall henceforth refer to that application (S.B. Criminal Miscellan...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).11141 OF2018NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA & OTHERS ... APPELLANT(S) VERSUS MADHUKAR KUMAR & OTHERS ... RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT K.M. JOSEPH, J.1. Respondent Nos. 1 to 17 in this appeal (hereinafter referred to as, the writ petitioners), filed Writ Petition No.5643 of 2012. The relief sought in this Writ Petition was to restrain the construction of a toll plaza at 194 km of NH30 in the four-laning of Patna-Bakhtiyarpur section of NH30, in violation of Rule 8 of the National Highways Fee (Determination of Rates and Collection) Rules, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as, the Rules, for short). The said Writ Petition 1 was heard along with Writ Petition No.4526 of 2013, filed by one Shri Ritesh Ranjan Singh @ Bittu Singh. By Judgment dated 22.07.2014, the Writ Petitions were allowed in the following manner by the learned Single Judge: 32. Thus, on the basis of aforesaid discussions, these writ petiti...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.721 OF2021(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CRIMINAL) No.4407 OF2020 THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. .....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS RAJ KUMAR @ BITTU .....RESPONDENT(S) W I T H CRIMINAL APPEAL No.722 OF2021(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CRIMINAL) No.4634 OF2020 A N D CRIMINAL APPEAL No.723 OF2021(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CRIMINAL) No.2350 OF2021 JUDGMENT HEMANT GUPTA, J.1. The State and the writ petitioner before the High Court,1 are ag- grieved by an order passed by the learned Single Bench of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh on 12.5.2020 whereby the policies of the State Government to grant remission to the prisoners were decided, inter alia, directing the State to consider the feasibility of drafting a fresh policy particularly in re- 1 Hereinafter referred to as the prisoner 1 spect of exercise of powers conferred under Article 161 of the Constitution. It was also held that the State may also consider the feasibi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.526 OF2021(Arising from SLP (Crl.) No.3549 of 2018) SUNIL KUMAR @ SUDHIR KUMAR & ANR. .. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH . RESPONDENT(S) JUDGEMENT Leave granted.2. In view of the order dated 13.04.2018 passed by this Court while granting permission to file Special Leave Petition and issuing notice, the scope of this appeal is restricted to the question of sentence; and the appellants herein, after their conviction of offences under Sections 363, 366 and 376(1) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), have already undergone 13 years and 2 months of imprisonment. In the given circumstances, we have heard learned counsel for the parties finally at this stage itself. 2.1. Even the short question involved in this matter carries the peculiarities of its own, as noticed infra. 13. As regards relevant background aspects, suffice it to notice that on 03.02.2008, Case Crime No.44 of 2008 for o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.510 OF2021[ARISING OUT OF SLP (CRIMINAL) No.1796/2021]. GAUTAM NAVLAKHA APPELLANT(S) VERSUS NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY RESPONDENT (S) JUDGMENT K.M. JOSEP H, J.1. Leave granted.2. On the basis of FIR No.4 of 2018 dated 08.01.2018, registered at Vishrambagh Police Station, Pune, Maharashtra, which was one registered under Sections 153A, 505(1B) and Section 34 of IPC to which Section 120(B) was 1 added on 06.03.2018 and still further into which, Sections 13, 16, 17, 18, 18B, 20, 38 and 40 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (hereinafter referred to as the UAPA, for short), were added on 17.05.2018, and, in which FIR, the name of the appellant was added on 22.08.2018, the appellant came to be arrested from his residence in Delhi on 28.08.2018. The appellant moved Writ Petition No.2559 of 2018 seeking a Writ of Habeas Corpus in the High Court of Delhi. The High Court, apart from is...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
W.P.(Crl.) No.409 of 2020, etc. REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.409 OF2020STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ...Petitioner versus JAIL SUPERINTENDENT (ROPAR) & Ors. ...Respondent(s) WITH [Transfer Petition (Criminal) NO.104-114 of 2021]. JUDGMENT R. Subhash Reddy, J.(Writ Petition (Crl.) No.409/2020) This Writ Petition is filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, read with Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) by the State of Uttar Pradesh, seeking Writ of Mandamus, seeking appropriate directions, directing the respondent-State of Punjab and the Learned Judicial Magistrate-I, Mohali, 1 W.P.(Crl.) No.409 of 2020, etc. State of Punjab, to transfer the criminal proceedings and trial in the Case Crime No.05 of 2019, titled as State of Punjab v. Mukhtar Ansari, pending before the Judicial Magistrate-I, Mohali, State of Punjab, to the Court of Special Judge (MP/MLA), Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh and with a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Criminal Appeal No.1003 of 2017 Pyare Lal vs. State of Haryana 1 Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1003 OF2017PYARE LAL Appellant Versus ORDER STATE OF HARYANA Uday Umesh Lalit, J.Respondent 1. The Appellant (original Accused No.1) stands convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer life imprisonment and to other punishments including fine and default sentence under certain other offences. While granting Special Leave to Appeal, this Court by its Order dated 04.07.2017 rejected the prayer for bail. Another application for bail was thereafter preferred and when the application came up for consideration, it was reported that after having completed 8 years of actual sentence and the Appellant being aged above 75 years, in accordance with the existing policy of the State Criminal Appeal No.1003 of 2017 Pyare Lal vs. State of Haryana 2 Government, he was prematurely released in 201...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE19H DAY OF MAY, 2020 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE K. N. PHANEENDRA CRL.P. NO.6578/2019 BETWEEN1 BABUL KHAN S/O ARJUTH ALI KHAN AGED ABOUT46YEARS PRESENTLY R/AT SHED IN NAGESH LAND KOMMASANDRA, SARJAPURA HOBLI ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. PERMANENT R/OF KANBARI VILLAGE PERISBUR DISTRICT BANGLADESH C/O MR. SHAHEEN R/AT IMMADHUL HOSUR ROAD, BASAPURA ELECTRONIC CITY BENGALURU 560 100 2. TANIYA W/O MOHAMMED RAJU @ JUHAIL D/O BABUL KHAN AGED ABOUT20YEARS PRESENTLY R/AT SHED IN NAGESH LAND KOMMASANDRA, SARJAPURA HOBLI2ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. PERMANENT R/OF RAINDA VILLAGE BAGARHUT DISTRICT BANGLADESH C/O MR. SHAHEEN R/AT IMMADHUL HOSUR ROAD, BASAPURA ELECTRONIC CITY BENGALURU 560 100. ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C. MOHAMMED PASHA, ADVOCATE) AND1 STATE OF KARNATAKA BY SARJAPURA POLICE STATION BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT REP BY SPP, HIGH COURT CAMPUS, BENGALURU 560 001 2. UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS REP...
Tag this Judgment!