Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: prevention of cruelty to animals act 1960 Page 3 of about 278 results (0.067 seconds)

Shaikh Zakir Shaikh Nasir, Age 38 Years. Vs. the State of Maharashtra, ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... sindkheda police station has registered offence under cr no.19/2009 against the petitioner for offences under sections 11 (d) (e) (f) of prevention of cruelty to animals act, 1960 and under section 5 (1) 11 of maharashtra animal preservation act,1976 on 13.11.2009 and seized 29 bullocks from the custody of the petitioner and the said first information report is annexed herewith (exh. ..... learned counsel for respondent no.2 also canvassed that the rules have been framed under the prevention of cruelty to animals act, 1960 and said rules are known as "the transport of animals rules, 1978", and rule 56 thereof prescribes certain conditions for transportation of cattle by goods vehicle, which more particularly comprises that no goods vehicle shall carry more than six cattle. ..... it is alleged that while those animals were transported for the purpose of being slaughtered, an fir was registered for alleged violation of the provisions of prevention of cruelty to animals act, 1960, and the specific allegation in the fir was that the animals were transported for being slaughtered, and the animals were tied very tightly to each other. ..... learned counsel for respondent no.2 also submitted that the cruelty alleged against the petitioner is under section 11 (1) (d) (e) (f) of the prevention of cruelty to animals act, 1966 and also under clause (a) thereof, since although petitioner, who allegedly is owner of the said animals, subjected said animals to the torture, while transporting them.14. .....

Dr. Amar Chandra Saha Vs. the President, Calcutta Society for Preventi ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1993)1CALLT137(HC),96CWN1086

..... on behalf of the appellant that the society discharges certain public function or public duties for enforcing the provisions contained in the prevention of cruelty to animals act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as the said act). ..... held on 28th november, 1988, the appellant, hospital surgeon of the society, was directed to assume the charge of veterinary inspector in order to carry out field work in the interest of maintaining the provisions of prevention of cruelty to animals act, 1960. ..... the appellant, a veterinary inspector in the respondent calcutta society for the prevention of cruelty to animals, was appointed by an order dated 31st july, 1981, issued by the respondent calcutta society for the prevention of cruelty to animals (hereinafter referred to as 'the society') as hospital surgeon of the society with effect from ..... society registered under the societies registration act and performs certain duty towards prevention of cruelty to animals. ..... society mainly and primarily are to prevent cruelty to animals. ..... an infirmary by the society and arrange for medical aid for the treatment of sick and injured animal involved in street accidents ;(v) to adopt all means, as provided in law to stamp out the most barbarous and agonising practice of phooka performed by the heartless and unscrupulous goalas ;(vi) to prevent all forms of cruelty likely to be done towards the dumb and defenceless animals within the city ; and(vii) to make necessary propaganda indicating lessons on kindness towards .....

Animal Welfare Board of India Vs. Ombudsman

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR2006Ker201; [2006(3)JCR310]; 2006(2)KLT91

..... prevention of cruelty to animals act, 1960 ..... by the order of the state government dated 2.8.2002 cancelling the notification dated 3.7.2002 empowering the local bodies to take action for destruction of stray dogs in terms of section 11(3)(b) of the prevention of cruelty to animals act, hereinafter referred to as 'animals act'. ..... it is rather strange that the petitioner, a registered society for prevention of cruelty to animals wants dogs inflicted with fatal disease or suffering from rabies to be preserved at the ..... the animal welfare board of india and a registered society by name 'daya' (society for the prevention of cruelty to animals), the petitioners herein, it appears, are more interested in welfare and preservation of stray dogs, even though suffering from fatal diseases or even rabies and appear to have no concern for human ..... the impugned order exhibit p2 that the subject matter of the 'the dog rules' namely the animal birth control (dogs) rules is not one of the matters enumarated in sub-section (2), nor for that matter is this, one of the purposes of the act, it is however clear that rules made pursuant to the provisions contained in section 38( 1) of the act 1960, could not override the provisions contained in sections 9(f) and 11(3)(b) which in turn deals with ..... thought it expedient that effective steps be taken for destruction of stray dogs and as mentioned above, the rules made under section 38(2) could not take precedence over the provisions of animals act, 1960. .....

Pashu Krurata Nivaran Samiti Vs. Jaipur Municipal Corporation

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2005(3)Raj1659

..... killing of animals amounts to cruelty within the meaning of section 11 of the prevention of cruelty to animals act, 1960 (for short the act of 1960) and as such the public authority or the public officer cannot permit the slaughter of animals in ..... the main grievance of the petitioner society is that the respondents are not following provisions of the prevention of cruelty to animals (slaughter house) rules, 2000 (for short, the rules, 2000) as the provisions of slaughter house rules 2000 are ..... perused section 11 of the act of 1960 which deals with the cruelty towards animals and reads as under:-11 ..... the petitioner is with regard to cruelty to animals. ..... animal or willfully and unreasonably causes or attempts to cause any such drug or substance to be taken by (any animal); or(c) conveys or carries, whether in or upon any vehicle or not, any animal in such a manner or position as to subject it to unnecessary pain or suffering; or(d) being the owner of (any animal), fails to provide such animal with sufficient food, drink or shelter;(e) mutilates any animal or kills any animal (including stray dogs) by using the method of strychnine injections in the heart or in any other unnecessary) cruel manner, or) the offence of cruelty ..... section 2 of the rajasthan preservation of certain animals act, 1950 gives power to penalize the persons for killing of bull, cow, ox, or calf and provides punishment of imprisonment upto ten years and section 3 provides punishment of imprisonment upto seven years .....

All India Animal Welfare Association and ors. Vs. Brihanmumbai Municip ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(4)BomCR1

..... also pointed out the preamble of the prevention of cruelty to animals act, 1960, which emphasises,to prevent the infliction of unnecessary pain or suffering on animals and for that purpose to amend the law relating to the prevention of cruelty to animals.3. ..... the animal birth control (dogs) rules, 2001 have been enacted under section 38 of the prevention of cruelty to animals act, 1960, with a scheme to reduce the dog population by sterilization and minimization of stray dogs by participation of animal welfare organisations, private individuals and local ..... vans in each of the above six areas.f) the municipal commissioner shall ensure that through the aforesaid six sub-committees, sterilization of dogs programme is effectively implemented with a proper coordination, and rule 8 of the aforesaid animal birth control (dogs) rules, 2001, be strictly implemented with regard to identification and recording of sterilized dogs.g) the municipal commissioner shall ensure proper removal of garbage in all areas, as garbage is the main source for ..... general of india, learned advocate general for the state of goa and various other counsel on behalf of various parties, and after perusal of the provisions in the constitution of india, the animal birth control (dog) rules, 2001, action plan for control of stray animal menace (monkeys, stray dogs, stray cattle and pigs) formulated by the ministry of environment and forests of government of india, we are clearly of the view to tackle the serious menace .....

Donald Netto and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2007CriLJ258

..... was caused to any of the horses to attract section 11 (a) of the prevention of cruelty to animals act, 1960, and as the change of the shoes is normal in this field depending upon the necessity, it cannot be an act of cruelty towards the animals. ..... prevention of cruelty to; animals act, 1960 ..... of transfer of the horses, a-l with the collusion of a-2 and a-3, removed the high heel shoe of two horses as mentioned above and replaced with flat heel shoe which was an act of brutality, hurting and to destroy a living animal intentionally and with a dishonest intention to pull down the performance of the horse 'onnu onnu onnu'. ..... the complainant, the change of the heels was detected on the same day after transfer of the horses to the other trainer, therefore, there was no pain or cruelty towards the animal and the resultant loss, if any, to the complainant.5. ..... , there must be misappropriation, dishonest use of the property entrusted to the accused and intentional inducement to accused to deliver any property by the complainant or by maiming the animal or cruelty towards the animal.14. ..... whether the accused committed criminal breach of trust or cheating or mischief by maiming the horses and by causing cruelty towards the animals. ..... of the same, an enquiry was conducted and came to a conclusion that the accused deliberately changed the horse shoes which will affect the performance of the horse including the cruelty to the horse by resulting in dislocation of joint shoulders or fractures to the horse. .....

Prema Veeraraghavan Vs. State by the Inspector of Police, K-10 Koyambe ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2002(1)ALT(Cri)533

..... 11 of the prevention of cruelty to animals act, 1960. ..... is clear that the offence has been committed under the prevention of cruelty to animals act.7. ..... the submissions made by the counsel for the parties and on perusal of the case diary, it is noticed that the 2nd respondent would not be entitled to the custody of the buffaloes in view of section 29(3) of the prevention of cruelty to animals act.5. ..... the above section would provide that the custody of the animal could not be given to any of the persons, who are accused of the ..... chennai, returning the buffaloes in favour of the second respondent, who claimed to be the owner of the same, is challenged in this revision by prema veeraraghavan, expert consultant, committee for the purpose of control and supervision of experiments on animals (cpcsea), the first informant, the petitioner herein.2. ..... under rules 47 to 56 of the transport of animal rules, 1978, no goods vehicle should carry more than six cattle and there should be a valid certificate by a qualified veterinary surgeon that the animals are fit to travel and each consignment should bear a label showing the name and address of the consignor and ..... through the case diary and other records, it is clear that 18 buffaloes were packed in a lorry in violation of the transport of animal rules, 1978. ..... leading to the filing of the present revision are as follows:-(a) the petitioner is an expert consultant, cpcsea, government of india, on the subject of regulating experimentation on animals. .....

Rahimbhai Adambhai Tarakvadiya Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 2007CriLJ3443; (2008)1GLR222

..... 2005 being filed on the allegation that the sheeps and goats were being taken for slaughtering and therefore, the petitioner has committed offences under section 11 of the prevention of cruelty to animals act, 1960, sections 54, 56 and 50 of the bombay animal preservation act, 1954 and sections 66(1), 192 and 177 of the motor vehicles act. ..... petitioner has submitted that merely because the cattle were tied very closely to each other and the tempo was carrying more than the permitted number of cattle, it cannot be said that cruelty is committed so as to necessitate their seizure on the presumption that the cattle were meant to be slaughtered. ..... lordship then was) wherein in an identical set of facts, the court interfered with the order of the lower court and directed the investigating officer to deliver possession of the alive animals to the petitioner forthwith and the learned magistrate was also directed to see that the possession of animals was delivered to the petitioner immediately without fall on certain conditions. ..... 1,50,000/- with the bank and pay the maintenance costs of animals to the pajrapole for custody of the muddammal sheeps and goats intercepted and seized by the gadhda police at present kept at gadhda gaushala panjarapole ..... 258 of 2005 is decided, the custody of the muddamal animals must be handed over to the applicant and the present application deserves to ..... advocate next submitted that even assuming that the offence of cruelty is committed, this was the first offence. .....

People for Elimination of Stray Troubles (Pest) by Its Convenor Dr. Ro ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2005(6)BomCR728; (2005)107BOMLR914

..... 1596 of 1998 was affirmed by supreme court of india and thereafter the government of india issued rules under the prevention of cruelty of animals act, 1960 for animal birth control (dogs) rules, 2001. ..... 1596 of 1998 thought it fit that certain provisions of the prevention of cruelty to animals act have not been placed before the division bench deciding writ petition no. ..... the problem created by stray dogs have been actively considered and action plan for control of stray animal menace which include dogs has been laid down by the government of india. .....

Brooke Hospital for Animals and ors. Vs. Brook Hospital for Animals (I ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 155(2008)DLT305

..... 2 is the erstwhile chairman of the animal welfare board constituted under the provisions of the prevention of cruelty to animals act, 1960 by the government of india from the years 1992 to 1996. ..... indubitably, the whole object of enacting section 92 of the code was that it was considered desirable to prevent a public trust from being harassed or put to legal expenses by reckless or frivolous suits being brought against the trustees and hence a provision was made for the leave of the court to be obtained before the suit ..... 1, as a part of its activities, was desirous of setting up a hospital for animals in the region of delhi and made known its said intention to the respondent no. ..... trust deed, the term of the trustees was to be of three years only, but no steps have been taken by the respondents to hold elections for the post of trustees or to allow the professionals or people having love for animals to become involved in the affairs of the respondent no. 1.6. ..... 3 is an educationist by profession and was head of the academic department in the indian military academy, dehradun and is interested in the welfare of animals, and thus interested in the respondent no. ..... 1 for setting up of a hospital for the animals on the said land.4. ..... according to the petitioners, the respondents appear to have purchased the land without taking into consideration the fact that animals are not brought to hospital at far-flung places and a hospital has to be provided near a place frequented by animals.5. .....