Court : Jharkhand
..... the housing board and therefore, the matter was not required to be placed before the cabinet. referring to decision in "g.b.mahajan and others vs. jalgaon municipal council and others", reported in (1991) 3 scc 91, it is submitted that the joint venture entered into between jharkhand 37 state housing board and the private builders ..... , reported in (2012) 11 scc 1, the hon'ble supreme court has held thus:182. 5. in no case, the doctrine of promissory estoppel can be pressed into aid to compel the government or a public authority to carry out a representation or promise which is contrary to law or which was outside the authority or power ..... for schemes involving expenditure exceeding rs. 200 lakhs shall not be accorded without prior approval of the state government. the control of the government as envisaged under the act includes restraint, check etc. by the government and if prior approval of the state government was not taken by the board for executing schemes and entering into development .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... the housing board and therefore, the matter was not required to be placed before the cabinet. referring to decision in "g.b.mahajan and others vs. jalgaon municipal council and others", reported in (1991) 3 scc 91, it is submitted that the joint venture entered into between jharkhand 37 state housing board and the private builders ..... , reported in (2012) 11 scc 1, the hon'ble supreme court has held thus:182. 5. in no case, the doctrine of promissory estoppel can be pressed into aid to compel the government or a public authority to carry out a representation or promise which is contrary to law or which was outside the authority or power ..... for schemes involving expenditure exceeding rs. 200 lakhs shall not be accorded without prior approval of the state government. the control of the government as envisaged under the act includes restraint, check etc. by the government and if prior approval of the state government was not taken by the board for executing schemes and entering into development .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... the housing board and therefore, the matter was not required to be placed before the cabinet. referring to decision in "g.b.mahajan and others vs. jalgaon municipal council and others", reported in (1991) 3 scc 91, it is submitted that the joint venture entered into between jharkhand 37 state housing board and the private builders ..... , reported in (2012) 11 scc 1, the hon'ble supreme court has held thus:182. 5. in no case, the doctrine of promissory estoppel can be pressed into aid to compel the government or a public authority to carry out a representation or promise which is contrary to law or which was outside the authority or power ..... for schemes involving expenditure exceeding rs. 200 lakhs shall not be accorded without prior approval of the state government. the control of the government as envisaged under the act includes restraint, check etc. by the government and if prior approval of the state government was not taken by the board for executing schemes and entering into development .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... the housing board and therefore, the matter was not required to be placed before the cabinet. referring to decision in "g.b.mahajan and others vs. jalgaon municipal council and others", reported in (1991) 3 scc 91, it is submitted that the joint venture entered into between jharkhand 37 state housing board and the private builders ..... , reported in (2012) 11 scc 1, the hon'ble supreme court has held thus:182. 5. in no case, the doctrine of promissory estoppel can be pressed into aid to compel the government or a public authority to carry out a representation or promise which is contrary to law or which was outside the authority or power ..... for schemes involving expenditure exceeding rs. 200 lakhs shall not be accorded without prior approval of the state government. the control of the government as envisaged under the act includes restraint, check etc. by the government and if prior approval of the state government was not taken by the board for executing schemes and entering into development .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... the housing board and therefore, the matter was not required to be placed before the cabinet. referring to decision in "g.b.mahajan and others vs. jalgaon municipal council and others", reported in (1991) 3 scc 91, it is submitted that the joint venture entered into between jharkhand 37 state housing board and the private builders ..... , reported in (2012) 11 scc 1, the hon'ble supreme court has held thus:182. 5. in no case, the doctrine of promissory estoppel can be pressed into aid to compel the government or a public authority to carry out a representation or promise which is contrary to law or which was outside the authority or power ..... for schemes involving expenditure exceeding rs. 200 lakhs shall not be accorded without prior approval of the state government. the control of the government as envisaged under the act includes restraint, check etc. by the government and if prior approval of the state government was not taken by the board for executing schemes and entering into development .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... the housing board and therefore, the matter was not required to be placed before the cabinet. referring to decision in "g.b.mahajan and others vs. jalgaon municipal council and others", reported in (1991) 3 scc 91, it is submitted that the joint venture entered into between jharkhand 37 state housing board and the private builders ..... , reported in (2012) 11 scc 1, the hon'ble supreme court has held thus:182. 5. in no case, the doctrine of promissory estoppel can be pressed into aid to compel the government or a public authority to carry out a representation or promise which is contrary to law or which was outside the authority or power ..... for schemes involving expenditure exceeding rs. 200 lakhs shall not be accorded without prior approval of the state government. the control of the government as envisaged under the act includes restraint, check etc. by the government and if prior approval of the state government was not taken by the board for executing schemes and entering into development .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... the housing board and therefore, the matter was not required to be placed before the cabinet. referring to decision in "g.b.mahajan and others vs. jalgaon municipal council and others", reported in (1991) 3 scc 91, it is submitted that the joint venture entered into between jharkhand 37 state housing board and the private builders ..... , reported in (2012) 11 scc 1, the hon'ble supreme court has held thus:182. 5. in no case, the doctrine of promissory estoppel can be pressed into aid to compel the government or a public authority to carry out a representation or promise which is contrary to law or which was outside the authority or power ..... for schemes involving expenditure exceeding rs. 200 lakhs shall not be accorded without prior approval of the state government. the control of the government as envisaged under the act includes restraint, check etc. by the government and if prior approval of the state government was not taken by the board for executing schemes and entering into development .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... the housing board and therefore, the matter was not required to be placed before the cabinet. referring to decision in "g.b.mahajan and others vs. jalgaon municipal council and others", reported in (1991) 3 scc 91, it is submitted that the joint venture entered into between jharkhand 37 state housing board and the private builders ..... , reported in (2012) 11 scc 1, the hon'ble supreme court has held thus:182. 5. in no case, the doctrine of promissory estoppel can be pressed into aid to compel the government or a public authority to carry out a representation or promise which is contrary to law or which was outside the authority or power ..... for schemes involving expenditure exceeding rs. 200 lakhs shall not be accorded without prior approval of the state government. the control of the government as envisaged under the act includes restraint, check etc. by the government and if prior approval of the state government was not taken by the board for executing schemes and entering into development .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... religious workship) or societies and trusts for religious or charitable or other public purposes and notified as such by the central government under the income tax act, 1961 (43 of 1961).2. provided that if such class of establishments run any university, any college, any school, any scientific institution, any ..... factory in case of sickness, maternity and employment injury and to make provision for certain other matters in relation thereto. the employees' state insurance act is a social security legislation and the canons of interpreting a social legislation are different from the canons of interpretation of taxation law. the courts ..... provident fund commissioner, new delhi and another in support of their contention. the said establishment which was already operating provident fund scheme governed by provident fund act, 1925 was sought to be covered as an establishment within the meaning of the expression 'all establishments, clubs, association which render service to their members .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... in maa vaishno devi mahila mahavidyalaya case the hon'ble supreme court has observed that the provisions of the national council for teacher education, 20 1993 are para materia to the provisions of all india council for technical education act, 1987 and medical council act. in state of t.n. & anr. vs. adhiyaman educational & research institute & ors. (1995) ..... cannot be thrown out. 31. to conclude, i hold that clause 10 in resolution dated 20.05.2004 contravenes the provisions of the national council for teacher education act, 1993 and the regulations made thereunder and thus, the impugned clause 10 is invalid and inoperative. it is further held that clause 10 in resolution ..... the state government is denuded of its power to legislate on the subject or to prescribe further guidelines on the subject covered under the national council for teacher education act, 1993 or the regulation framed thereunder. it is submitted that the resolution dated 20.05.2004 stood quashed by this court in the case .....
Tag this Judgment!