Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: press council act 1978 section 21 interim reports Court: mumbai Page 5 of about 8,714 results (0.085 seconds)

Balasaheb and Another Vs. The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secret ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... adherence to the provisions of sub sections (3), (4) and (5) of sec. 3 of the municipal councils act are not dispensed with. 15. an interpretation leading to functional disjunction shall have to be avoided. that being absolutely not intended under the two legislation competently enacted. even ..... municipal corporation. having regard to aforesaid, it cannot be said that requirement of sub-sec. (3), (4) and (5) of sec. 3 of municipal councils act can be dispensed with. those in the circumstances of present case would require scrupulous adherence under the legislative mandate appearing in the section. in the light of that, ..... in the official gazette (declare whole of any local area comprising a municipal area shall, cease to be a municipal area). section 3 of the municipal councils act lays down the procedure of specifying area as smaller urban area which requires publication of notification in the official gazette and also in atleast one news paper .....

Hans George Vs. State

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1964Bom274; (1964)66BOMLR262; 1964CriLJ650; ILR1964Bom319; 1964MhLJ441

..... strict liability cart have no application. offences which are within the exceptional class of offences which can be committed without a guilty mind are, as stated by the privy council in shrinivas mall's case 49 bom lr 688 : air 1947 pc 135, usually of a comparatively minor character.31. it is urged by the learned government ..... to call attention to a decision of the supreme court in harla v. state of rajasthan : [1952]1scr110 . a council of ministers appointed by the crown representative passed a resolution purporting to enact the jaipur opium act. the resolution was not published and the question which arose before the supreme court was whether the mere passing of the ..... (4) of the defence of india rules, 1939. while upholding the conviction of the appellants on merits, the privy council expressly dissented from the view expressed by the high court of patna that the 1st appellant would have been liable for the acts of his servant, the 2nd appellant, even if he was not aware of the unlawful .....

Ganesh Narayan and ors. Vs. Commissioner, Nagpur Division, Nagpurand o ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1965Bom92; (1964)66BOMLR807; ILR1965Bom200; 1965MhLJ577

..... by any legislature now or heretofore established in british india, as well as from the law prescribed for the said courts and offices by the regulations and acts aforesaid. and no act hereafter passed by the council of the governor-general for making laws and regulations shall be deemed to extend to any part of the said territory, unless the same be specially ..... districts known as berar districts, namely, amravati, akola, buldhana and yeotmal, was the berar land revenue code.(31) under the central provinces land revenue act, 1881, the chief commissioner, subject to the control of the governor-general in council, was the chief controlling revenue authority. besides the chief commissioner other revenue officers were, commissioners, deputy commissioners, assistant commissioners, tahslidars and naib-tansildars .....

Ford Motor Company of India Limited Vs. the Secretary of State for Ind ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1936Bom356; (1936)38BOMLR283

..... . mr. coltman did not confine his argument to post-importation charges, though he laid more emphasis on them having regard to the views expressed by the privy council, but in opening the case he complained that the price charged by the plaintiffs covered the overhead charges of the plaintiffs, e.g., office expenses and advertisement ..... price primarily in view is, they cannot doubt, that price current for staple articles, the amount of which, if not a subject of daily publication in the press, is easily ascertainable in appropriate trade circles.mr. coltman has argued that you could not easily ascertain the price at which motor-cars of this description were saleable. ..... wholesale cash price, less trade discount, at the time and place of importation within the meaning of section 30, sub-section (a), of the indian sea customs act.11. mr. coltman first contended that the sale between the plaintiffs and their retailers took place at the time when the orders were, according to the evidence of .....

Vishal Gomantak Shipping Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Board of Trustees for the P ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1986Bom394

..... , not only to the individual but to the profession generally, and i am satisfied that no amendment of the 1878 act should be construed as altering the plain provisions of that act requiring the decision of the general council on disciplinary matters unless the intention is expressed in language equally clear and explicit.'similarly, in vine v. national dock ..... . in fact, it was only in the affidavit-in-reply that the respondent sought to give reasons though as observed in mohinder singh v. chief election commr. : [1978]2scr272 , that is not permissible. even then, the only reasons given in the affidavit-in-reply to justify the decision are that the vessel damodar sal was not properly ..... the penalty was by an authority without jurisdiction. therefore, as held by the supreme court in asstt. collector, c.e. v. n.t.co. of india ltd., : 1978(2)elt416(sc) , it was possible to raise the challenge, as the petitioners did in the affidavit-in-reply.9. there is great force in the submissions made on .....

A.G. Narvel Vs. Shri B.i. Nhinglavha and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1999)101BOMLR196

..... remaining in the place. the allegation seems to be that the place was being used by prostitutes for their trade. under section 2(1) of the bombay police act, place of public entertainment is defined and it includes a lodging house. the question is whether prostitutes were permitted to carry on trade knowingly by the persons of the ..... petition, on behalf of the petitioner, it is contended that there has been no violation of rule 32 of the rules framed under the bombay police act. rule 32 of the act reads as under:if any person keeping a place of public entertainment knowingly permits prostitutes for the purpose of their trade or persons of notoriously bad ..... . by consent, rule made returnable and heard forthwith.3. the petitioner who is running a lodging home, having a licence granted to him under the bombay police act, 1951 has approached this court against the order of the police commissioner, thane, whereby by order dated 22nd june, 1998 the licence granted to the petitioner under the .....

Mian Feroz Shah Vs. Sir Mohammad Akbar Khan

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1939)41BOMLR1071

..... not a usufructuary mortgage, but only a simple mortgage which did not entitle him to possession of the land. the matter was taken on appeal to his majesty in council, and the judgment of this board, delivered on april 11, 1933, was to the effect that the appellant's mortgage deed entitled him to enter into possession ..... ground that the respondent's proceedings in execution were recklessly or maliciously taken. this has not been persisted in and is quite unfounded. apart from this, the illegal act charged against the respondent was that the appellant's right of possession had been interfered with from the date of the attachment, june 10, 1927, and his cause ..... he had done this without reserving the rights of the present appellant; that in these proceedings the receiver had dispossessed the appellant, and that this was an illegal act for which the respondent was liable to pay to the appellant 'the sum equivalent to the price of the produce as damages which should have accrued to the plaintiff .....

Hirabai Jehangir Mistry Vs. Dinshaw Edulji Karkaria

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1926)28BOMLR1334; 95Ind.Cas.556

..... se inbro-duced by those clauses of the charter by which the courts of oyer and termi-ner were established ?10. lord kingsdown in delivering the judgment of the privy council states (p. 426):-the english law, civil and criminal, has been usually considered be have been made applicable to natives, within the limits of calcutta, in the year ..... of the rolls (better known as lord justice a. l smith) says (p. 447):-i feel that if we were to accede to the argument which has been pressed strongly upon us on behalf of the plaintiff we should be relaxing the very salutary rule laid down in olden fames restricting actions of slander, where no special damage is ..... parsis are governed. i have, therefore, considered the question before us in the light of the english law being applicable to it. that law is now embodied in the succession act, but is virtually left unaltered by its codification.16. so, too, in payne & co. v. pirojshah : (1911)13bomlr920 mr. justice davar, who was himself a parsi, said (p. .....

Balaji Cotton Company Vs. Sales Tax Officer

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1993(1)MhLj105

..... within that period, by an order dated april 7, 1976, penalty of rs. 45,000 was again imposed on the petitioner under section 36(2)(c) of the act. the petitioner preferred appeal before the assistant commissioner of sales tax (appeals) ii, nagpur division, amravati. the said appeal being dismissed, the petitioner preferred second appeal before ..... setting out the various powers which can be exercised by the appellate authorities in appeals (both first appeal and second appeal) against different orders was introduced by the maharashtra act 42 of 1971. prior to that, this sub-section read as follows : '(6) subject to such rules of procedure as may be prescribed, an appellate authority ..... the matter again and to pass a fresh order of penalty. in view of the foregoing discussion, we are of the opinion that the sales tax officer acted without any authority of law in passing the fresh order of penalty after his original order imposing penalty had been cancelled or set aside by the appellate authority. .....

Association of Engineering Workers Vs. Dockyard Labour Union and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1991(3)BomCR729; (1994)IIILLJ242Bom; 1991(1)MhLj1278

..... by communication dated march 12, 1981 dockyard labour union was informed that as it was found that the union had posted the annual returns for year 1978 and 1979 by delivering the same to the registry's office it has been decided to treat the cancellation as withdrawn. it is not in dispute that ..... having been preferred, claimed the petitioner union, the order of cancellation of registration stands and the application for derecognition under section 13 of the mrtu & pulp act was not maintainable. the preliminary objection to the maintainability of the application raised on behalf of the petitioner union was turned down by the industrial court by ..... labour union was cancelled by the additional registrar of trade unions, bombay on january 30, 1981 and consequently the application for registration under the mrtu & pulp act was not maintainable. the dockyard labour union answered the preliminary objection by pointing out that the order of cancellation of the registration passed on january 30, .....