Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: press council act 1978 chapter iv miscellaneous Sorted by: recent Court: patna Page 4 of about 51 results (0.089 seconds)

Ashirvad Enterprises and ors. and L.N. Poddar Vs. State of Bihar and a ...

Court : Patna

..... their disagreement with the views expressed by the calcutta high court in jyoti prakash mitter v. haramohan chowdhury : [1978]112itr384(cal) . in telu ram raunqi ram v. ito , the petitioner assessee was being prosecuted for an offence under section 277 of the act before a criminal court and had moved the court invoking inherent jurisdiction after the charge had been framed against ..... of the offences alleged, copy of which is annexure-2.3. learned counsel for the petitioners pressed both the applications mainly on the ground that since the firm had already filed an application before the income-tax settlement commission under section 245c of the act, the complaint subsequently filed is incompetent in the eye of law and the criminal prosecution of the .....

Ashirvad Enterprises and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Patna

..... their disagreement with the views expressed by the calcutta high court in jyoti prakash mitter v. haramohan chowdhury : [1978]112itr384(cal) . in telu ram raunaq ram v. ito , the petitioner assessee was being prosecuted for an offence under section 277 of the act before a criminal court and had moved the court invoking inherent jurisdiction after the charge had been framed against ..... cognizance of the offences alleged, copy of which is annexure-2.learned counsel for the petitioners pressed both the applications mainly on the ground that since the firm had already filed an application before the income tax settlement commission under section 245c of the act, the complaint subsequently filed is incompetent in the eye of law and the criminal prosecution of the .....

income-tax Officer Vs. Gayatri Coal Supply Co.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Patna

Reported in : (1997)63ITD237(Pat.)

..... r.parmanand chichar [1995] 212 itr 536 at page 538/78 taxman 361 where the hon'ble high court held the following : "we find that for the assessment year 1978-79, the return was filed on march 2, 1981, that is to say, within two days of filing of the return for the previous year, namely, 1977-78 ..... to prove" after 10-9-1986 the existence of a reasonable cause which prevented him from discharging the statutory obligations or the mandate contained in that particular provision of it act, 1961.4. when i examined the material brought on record i notice that this assessee (which is a partnership firm consisting of several partners) has not discharged ..... of proof from the revenue to the person charged for the alleged offence or contravention in respect of various obligations and mandates contained in different provisions of the it act, 1961. therefore, mere making a submission or tendering an explanation about a reasonable cause by a person/assessee will not be adequate discharge of onus or burden .....

Dr. K.M. Prasad Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

..... detention. the division bench of the said high court while interpreting section 167 of the code of criminal procedure and also sub-section (2-a) as inserted by act 45 of 1978 held as under:para 16: 'thus in a case where a person is accused in more cases than one, the officer in charge of the police station or ..... has been time and again examined by the apex court in number of cases beginning from a. k. gopalan's case : 1950crilj1383 including the case of maneka gandhi : [1978]2scr621 . prior to the decision in maneka's case (supra) article 21 was construed narrowly only as a guarantee against executive action unsupported bylaw, but maneka's case opened ..... gandhi v. union of india (supra) the question falls for consideration before the apex court was as to whether the power conferred to the authorities under the passports act, 1967, for impounding a passport in the interest of the general public is violative of article 14 of the constitution and whether section 10(3)(c) of the said .....

Baldeo Choudhary and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

..... by bihar rajya pul nirman nigam limited. the toll is also not to be levied from members of the bihar legislative assembly or council or members of the parliament or defence personnel.26. the state government can levy toll under entry 59 of list ii (state list ..... named in appendix 1 subject to the proviso that such an order has been published in the bihar gazette and also in the press for the information of the general public.24. in case it is decided by the state government or the corporation to put ..... by the state government was rs. 6,70,000/- in the year 1965 when the bridge was constructed and after the end of 1978-79 period, the state government had already realised a sum of rs. 6,74,259/-. the court thus held that the state ..... indian constitution for compensating government to recover the expenditure made on construction of a bridge, etc. is recognised under toll act, 1851 read with tolls act xv of 1954. but it is not a power which can be called in aid' by the state government for augmenting .....

Shashi Kumar Sinha Vs. Election Commission of India and anr.

Court : Patna

..... and settled views of the apex court in the cases, namely : [1952]1scr218 n.p. ponnuswawi v. the returning officer, namakkal contituency, namakkal and ors. : [1978]2scr272 ; mohinder singh gill and anr. v. the chief election commissioner, new delhi and ors. a.i.r. s.c. 61, the election commission of india v ..... individual may obtain to negative an unlawful exercise of power. these are essentially remedies used to set aside unlawful decisions, or prevent the doing of unlawful acts, or compel the performance of public duties. these remedies now include the prerogative remedies certiorari, mandamus and prohibition, and the ordinary remedies of declarations and ..... and or applying the statutory requirements.7. it is well known that article 324 of the constitution read with the provisions of representation of the people act specially section 58a have vested in election commission ail the powers of superintendence and control over such election regarding conduct of election. therefore, if the .....

State of Bihar Vs. Smt. Sharda Devi

Court : Patna

..... decree, an appeal shall lie in the high court from the award of any part of the award of the court in any proceedings under this act.'in order to remove the bar to appeals to the privy council form the decision of the high court in cases in which the value of the claim was rs. 10, 00/- or upwards ..... the vendor of the respondent was in possession at the time of vesting.25. on behalf of the respondent, strong reliance was placed on harihar singh v. additional collector, 1978 bbc 323 in which case, according to the learned judge, in identical situation, a settles was found in cultivating possession of land in question as settled raiyat of the village ..... prejudice' which, according to the learned single judge was of no avail to the state in view of the decision of this court in harihar singh v. additional collector, 1978 bbcj 323). learned single judge agreeing with the view of the special subordinate judge did not place any reliance on ext. 6 (photography of returns) learned judge held that .....

Krishna Kumar Mishra and anr. Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Bihar and ors. Et ...

Court : Patna

..... that such proportionate reservation is repugnant and totally contrary to the constitution. according to the counsel, communal award for separate electoral roll for muslims was introduced by indian council's act, 1909, based on morley minto reference. separate constituencies were created for a different groups based on population divisions in society, but the same was consciously rejected ..... a pancha. it was suggested that the members of gram sabha are to be compared with members of lok sabha, the panches are to be compared with the council of minister and the mukhiya is to be compared with the prime minister of the country. so, according to them, as there is no provision like reservation ..... field, itself is viola-live of article 14 of the constitution. giving reference to different dates, it was pointed out that in the last panchayat election held in 1978, out of 11,378 posts/seats of mukhiyas, more than 5,000 seats / posts are being held by dominant castes i.e. yadavas, kurmis and koeris, .....

Parsu Ram Mahto and ors. Vs. Mohan Lal Mahto

Court : Patna

..... and ors. v mangani devi alias asha devi and after her bachi devi and ors.). it can again be stated that the monumental decision of the privy council as reported in 1940 privy council page 105 (secretary of state v. mask & co.) is still a good law and the different enactments made after the independence of india creating some ..... preferred by the above named plaintiffs-appellants against the judgment and decree dated 23.2.80 and 5.3.80 respectively in title suit no. 147/14 of 1975/1978 passed by sri ram chandra prasad, the then additional subordinate judge, ranchi dismissing the plaintiffs' suit.2. the suit was filed by the plaintiffs for declaration of their ..... written statement no paper have also been submitted as it is revealed from the impugned judgment itself to that effect. similarly section 6 of the bihar land reforms act does also not specifically applicable in respect of fixation of rent in favour of the defendant. the status of harihar mahato and then madan mahato were of zamindar .....

Haquik Mian Vs. Rajendra Prasad and ors.

Court : Patna

..... or referring certain classes of these petitions to the chancellor, and this custom was confirmed by an order of edward iii in 1349. the chancellor acted at first in the name of the king in council, but in 1474 a decree was made on his own authority, and this practice continued, so that there came to be a court of ..... , which was put in execution and land was purchased by mortgagee the defendants. the dictum of ramjit chaudhary's case (supra) would not apply. mahabir singh v. rameshwar singh, 1978 b.l.j.r. 768 : (air 1979 patna 46) (supra) was a case where holding was not transferable hence that case is of no assistance to the respondents. 17 ..... purchaser. there was no covenant that lala sital lal, mortgagee must pay the rent. the appeal was liable to be dismissed. he leaned heavily on mahabir singh v. rameshwar singh, 1978 bljr 768 : (air 1979 patna 46); ranjit choudhary alias bagar choudhary v. satan devi, 1970 bljr 756. 8. having carefully weighed the submissions of the learned counsel for .....