Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: press council act 1978 chapter iv miscellaneous Sorted by: recent Court: orissa Page 1 of about 87 results (0.120 seconds)

Apr 13 2007 (HC)

Sri Jagdish Chandra Kanungo Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 104(2007)CLT120

..... every year furnish their respective annual budget estimates for the coming year to the director along with copies of the resolutions of the respective general councils/council adopting the said budget estimates.rule 5-the budget estimates on the expenditure side shall provide for (i) pay and allowances of the establishment ..... 1990 and other regulations and instructions issued under the orissa universities act, 1989 of the statutes thereunder (as amended from time to time) relating to contributory provident fund, general provident fund, pension, gratuity and other ..... such detailed procedure as may be determined by the committee in consultation with the government.4. adoption of the provisions under the orissa universities act for the employees of the academic- (i) subject to the provisions contained hereinbefore, the provisions contained in the orissa universities final statutes, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 1975 (HC)

State Financial Corporation Ltd. Vs. Satpathy Brothers and Nanda Co. ( ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1975Ori132

..... oath, and requiring the discovery and production of documents are a valuable safeguard for the personsaffected. so is the provision for appeal ....................'9. the provisions under the act are more liberal. the application is to be filed before a district judge and an appeal lies to the high court. the entire civil procedure code is to be ..... recourse is taken to a civil suit it would be filed in a competent court of lowest jurisdiction. a subordinate judge has unlimited pecuniary jurisdiction. under the act without filing an application before a subordinate judge it would be filed before the district judge. if the valuation of the application is less than rs. 5, ..... be applied thereto. that means the whole of the civil procedure code would apply excepting the provisions which would be inconsistent with any of the provisions prescribed in the act.under section 32(7) the district judge may pass any order as he thinks fit. he may confirm the order of attachment and direct the sale of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 12 1968 (HC)

Jagannath Das Vs. State of Orissa and anr.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1968Ori176; 34(1968)CLT594

..... expired.9. on august 12, 1965 in exercise pi the powers conferred by section 19 (in chapter iii constitution and composition of state councils) of the act, the orissa state government constituted the state council of pharmacy consisting of thirteen members including the director of health services and drugs controller of orissa as ex-officio member and the petitioner as ..... one of the members on april 12. 1966 the petitioner was elected president of the council under section 23 of the act from among the members thereafter, the petitioner, as president wanted charge of that office to be handed over to him by the opposite party no ..... had expired but he (opposite party no 2) withheld handing over charge.10. in orissa, as already stated, the first state pharmacy council was constituted under section 23 (in chapter iii) of the act on december 30, 1959, that is, at a point of time when chapter iii had not come into force in orissa and also .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 20 2014 (HC)

Pravata Kumar Tripathy Vs. Union of India (Cbi)

Court : Orissa

..... 120-b/294/341/406/409/420/467/468/ 471/506/34 i.p.c. and sections 3,4 and 5 of prize chits and money circulation schemes (banning) act, 1978 against 48 named persons who were in the management/ staff/agent of at group of companies and against other staffs of at group and unknown 9 others. the investigation was ..... hanif, jhuma chakrabarti and munmaya sial under sections 420,406,120-b indian penal code read with sections 4,5 and 6 of prize chits and money circulation schemes (banning) act, 1978. the investigation was kept open for arresting the absconding accused persons namely manranjan nanda, sambit khuntia, rahul kanwal, jyoti prakash jay prakash, chandrika patnaik and others and for many ..... b,294,341,406,420,467,468,471,506 read with section 34 indian penal code and section 3,4 and 5 of prize chits and money circulation schemes (banning) act, 1978 which arises out of kharvelnagar p.s. case no.44 dated 7.2.2013. as it appears the aforesaid kharvelnagar p.s. case no.44 of 2013 was instituted .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 24 2013 (HC)

Ajit Kumar Routray Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

..... interfere. see anisminic ltd. v. foreign compensation commission42. and, of course, if the body acts in bad faith or for an ulterior object, which is no.authorised by law, its decision will be set aside. see sydney municipal council v. campbell 43. in exercising these powers, the courts will take into account any reasons which ..... the body may give for its decisions. if it gives no reasons in a case when it may reasonably be expected to do so, the courts may infer that it has no good reason for reaching its conclusion, and act ..... (1985) and the expectation of future adoption of proportionality 11. the principles of judicial review of administrative action were further summarised in 1985 by lord diplock in council of civil service unions v. minister for civil service9 as illegality, procedural impropriety and irrationality. he said more grounds could in future 32 become available, including .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 16 2010 (HC)

Jayaram SwaIn and ors.Vs. State of OrissA.

Court : Orissa

..... in this regard must be affixed in the notice board of the tahasildar and a copy of the same shall also be sent to the gram panchayat or notified area council or municipality, as the case may be, under which the land is situated. as could be seen from the records, no such procedure appears to have been followed and ..... s.p. gupta v. union of india & anr., air 1982 sc 149; and decisions of the supreme court in janata dal v. h.s. chowdhary, air 1993 sc 892; indian council for enviro-legal action v. union of india & ors., (1996) 5 scc 281; and state of uttaranchal v. balwant singh choufal, (2010) 3 scc 402 and requested this court to ..... in sub-clause (ix) of rule 2(a) of the companies (acceptance of deposits) rules, 1975, the amendment rules, 1978 added the expression: any amount received ... by a private company which has become a public company under section 43-a of the act and continues to include in its articles of association provisions relating to the matters specified in clause (iii) of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 16 2010 (HC)

Sudarshan Gochhayat. Vs. State of OrissA.

Court : Orissa

..... in this regard must be affixed in the notice board of the tahasildar and a copy of the same shall also be sent to the gram panchayat or notified area council or municipality, as the case may be, under which the land is situated. as could be seen from the records, no such procedure appears to have been followed and ..... s.p. gupta v. union of india & anr., air 1982 sc 149; and decisions of the supreme court in janata dal v. h.s. chowdhary, air 1993 sc 892; indian council for enviro-legal action v. union of india & ors., (1996) 5 scc 281; and state of uttaranchal v. balwant singh choufal, (2010) 3 scc 402 and requested this court to ..... in sub-clause (ix) of rule 2(a) of the companies (acceptance of deposits) rules, 1975, the amendment rules, 1978 added the expression: any amount received ... by a private company which has become a public company under section 43-a of the act and continues to include in its articles of association provisions relating to the matters specified in clause (iii) of .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 18 2010 (HC)

Sidheswar Kanungo. Vs. Food Corporation of India and ors.

Court : Orissa

..... (dudley) ltd. v. crabtree (1974) icr 120 (nirc) it was observed: "failure to give reasons amounts to denial of justice".in vasant d. bhavsar v. bar council of india (1999) 1 scc 45, the apex court held that an authority must pass a speaking and reasoned order indicating the material on which its conclusions are based.the ..... by reasons so mentioned therein and it cannot be supplemented by fresh reasons. (see mohinder singh gill & anr. vs. the chief election commissioner, new delhi & ors., air 1978 sc 851) therefore, the new reasonings given by sri c.p. gond, deputy manager (general) to justify the adverse remarks made in the year 1993 is not legally sustainable. ..... a government servant against the adverse entries the competent authority is not under any obligation to record reasons. but the competent authority has no licence to act arbitrarily, he must act in a fair and just manner. he is required to consider the questions raised by the government servant and examine the same, in the light of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 30 2008 (HC)

Sarat Kumar Kar Vs. State of Orissa and anr.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 2008(II)OLR891

..... deputy chairman thereof.39. powers, privileges and immunities of the legislative assembly and of the members and the committees thereof, and, if there is a legislative council, of that council and of the members and the committees thereof; enforcement of attendance of persons for giving evidence or producing documents before committees of the legislature of the state. ..... appointed to the secretarial staff of the assembly by law and, therefore, there is no interference of the state government therein. section 3 of the commission of inquiry act empowers the 'appropriate government' to appoint commission of inquiry for the purpose of making an enquiry into any definite matter of public importance. the definition of 'appropriate ..... list or concurrent list. the hon'ble apex court in a land mark decision in the case of state of karnataka v. union of india : [1978]2scr1 has, inter alia, held that there is no justification for reading down the provisions of section 3(1) of the commissions of inquiry .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 10 2008 (HC)

State Election Commission Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 106(2008)CLT805

..... imposed on him under this act or any other law.(5) the members of the advisory council shall hold office during the pleasure of the government.13. in the instant case, the court's order was in force for a ..... 48 shall mutatis mutandis be applicable in respect of the administrator appointed under sub-section (1).(4) the government may, if it thinks fit, appoint ad advisory council to advise and assist the administrator appointed under sub-section (1) in the exercise of the powers and performance and discharge of the duties and junctions conferred or ..... terms' by the hon'ble supreme court in several decisions including special reference no. 1 of 2002 : air2003sc87 and mohinder singh gill v. chief election commission : [1978]2scr272 and the question is whether this is equally relevant in respect of the powers of the state election commission as well wherein it was held that from a reading .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //