Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: press council act 1978 chapter iv miscellaneous Sorted by: recent Court: karnataka Page 1 of about 904 results (1.254 seconds)

M B Adinarayana Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... of its members and committees immediately before the coming into force of section 26 of the constitution forty-fourth amendment) act, 1978]..195. salaries and allowances of members.- members of the legislative assembly and the legislative council of a state shall be entitled to receive such salaries and allowances as may from time to time be determined, ..... be less than twelve:34. provided further that where the total number of ministers, including the chief minister, in the council of ministers in any state at the commencement of the constitution (ninety-first amendment) act, 2003 exceeds the said fifteen per cent or the number specified in the first proviso, as the case may be, ..... ministers, 4 writ petition (pil) no.119 of 2016, decided on 13.04.2018 20 but the said act only deals with the powers and privileges of the members of the legislature assembly and legislature council which will be covered under entry-39, list-ii of schedule vii of the constitution of india. consideration of .....

Dr. Basavaraj Yellappa Kalgudi Vs. the Karnataka Ayurvedic and Unani P ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2004Kant390; ILR2004KAR3140

..... or a practitioner whose name if for the time being borne on the indian medical register maintained under the indian medical council act, 1956 or (iii) a person whose name is entered in the list mentioned in section 18, shall practice or hold himself out, whether directly or by ..... , which is identical with or is a colourable imitation of any degree, diploma, certificate or licence granted by a body or institution authorized under this act or under any central act or state act, for the time being in force, sub-section (2) of section 38 makes contravention of the provisions of sub-section (1) thereof an offence ..... on record.4. it is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is governed by the provisions of karnataka homeopathic practitioners act, 1961 (for short 'homeopathic act'). the said act does not contain any provision empowering the authorities to take action against a person who practices homeopathic system of medicine without requisite qualification. the .....

Prof. S.N. Hegde Vs. the Lokayukta and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2004KAR3892; 2004(3)KarLJ505

..... it is difficult for me to think that when the entire industrial field, even covering municipalities, universities, research councils and the like, is regulated in the critical area of industrial disputes by the i.d. act, parliament would have provided an oasis for the corporation where labour demands can be unilaterally ignored. the general words ..... examine the witnesses, the lokayukta has come to the conclusion that the allegations made against them have been substantiated and the said report is released to the press and it has been given wide publicity, thus seriously affecting the reputation of the petitioners. thus, the petitioner's fundamental right guaranteed to them under ..... of his life, his limbs, his body, his health and his reputation. the supreme court in maneka gandhi v. union of india and anr. : [1978]2scr621 , held that both the rights of personal security and the personal liberty recognised by what blackstone termed natural law are embodied in article 21 of the constitution .....

The Agricultural Produce Market Committee and ors. Vs. the State of Ka ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2003KAR4225

..... may be specified in the notification; (i) the powers and functions of the corporation municipal council or a mandal panchayat or a standing committee thereof, under the karnataka municipalities act, 1964, karnataka municipal corporations act, 1976 and the karnataka zilla parishads, taluk panchayath samithis, mandal panchyats and nyaya panchyats act, 1983, shall be exercised and discharged by the market committee; and (ii) the powers ..... may be specified in the notification with the powers and functions of the corporation, municipal council or a mandal panchayat or a standing committee thereof, under the karnataka municipalities act, 1964, karnataka municipal corporations act, 1976 and the karnataka zilla parishads, taluk panchayath samithis, mandal panchayats and nyaya panchayats act, 1983. section 63-a(1)(ii) provides that the state government, may by means .....

Karnataka Food Packers Vs. Regional Director, Esi

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1990KAR4364

..... benefit it has been passed and the nature of the benefit which is intended to be conferred on them. chapter ii of the act deals with the corporation, standing committee and medical benefit council and their constitution; chapter iii deals with the problem of finance and audit; chapter iv make provisions for contribution both by the employees ..... date. on this factual position, after referring to the case law, the division bench found that the observations made by a division bench of this court in hind art press v. esi : (1990)iillj195kant ran counter to the decision of the supreme court in gasket radiators pvt. ltd. v. esic. : (1985)illj506sc the division bench ..... found difficulty in agreeing with the view expressed in hind art press case : (1990)iillj195kant on the scope and ambit of section 68 of the act, and in view of this disagreement has referred the aforementioned three questions to a larger bench of three judges for opinion.4. .....

S.B. Mamle Desai Vs. Controller of Estate Duty and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [1985]155ITR667(KAR); [1985]155ITR667(Karn)

..... sought for writ in the nature of mandamus to the respondents to make payment of interest as claimed in his application dated april 10, 1978. 6. first, the petitioner has urged that s. 64(7) of the act should be so interpreted as enabling payment of interest to an accountable person when there is an order made in his favour by the ..... that the court has no power to allow interest in a case of this sort.' 27. in reaching the above conclusion, the learned judge expressed the view that the privy council in b.n.rly. v. ruttanji ramji , had disapproved the principles enunciated by the high court of madras in mahumadeen abdul saffur rowther's case [1919] ilr 42 mad 661 ..... . it appears appropriate to prefer the views expressed by the privy council in b.n.rly.co.'s case , and high court of bombay in municipal borogh's case air 1944 bom 233. for these reasons, i would prefer the views of .....

C.P. Appanna Vs. State of Coorg and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1958Kant102; AIR1958Mys102; (1958)36MysLJ73

..... the schedule to the coorg devolution rules, are preserved by section 97 of the government of india act. 1935, and article 242 of the constitution of india, the powers of the governor-general in council and the indian legislature under those rules including the overriding power of the indian legislature to legislate ..... by the extension to the province of coorg, the provisions of the act relating to legislative councils of lieutenant-governors and by the constitution of a legislative council for that province by the coorg electoral rules, the chief commissioner in legislative council of the province of coorg became the local legislature for that province. ..... the privy council in jogendra narayan v. debendra nara-yan on which the deputy commissioner relied, when properly understood, does not support the conclusion that the previous sanction of the governor-general obtained under section 97 of the government of india act, amounted to a declaration to that effect, did not press that contention. .....

Smt. G K Akshata Vs. V Raghavendra

Court : Karnataka

..... hada's case. anil hada's case has been overruled in aneeta hada's case. therefore, the decision in shanmugam's case would not be applicable and/or cannot be pressed into service. 23.5. furthermore, in shanmugam's case, aneeta hada's decision has been referred to which - 114 - nc:2024. khc:38869 crl.p no. ..... which substantially affects the right of the parties cannot be said to be an interlocutory order . in madhu limaye v. state of maharashtra [(1977) 4 scc551:1978. scc (cri) 10 : (1978) 1 scr749 a three-judge bench of this court has held an order rejecting the plea of the accused on a point which when accepted will conclude ..... 33596]. unsuccessfully. hence the instant slp.25. the question whether the respondent had sufficient cause for not filing the complaint against dakshin within the period prescribed under the act is not examined by either of the courts below. as rightly pointed out, the application, which is the subject-matter of the instant appeal purportedly filed invoking section .....

Smt K R Aruna Prasad Vs. Sri V Raghavendra

Court : Karnataka

..... hada's case. anil hada's case has been overruled in aneeta hada's case. therefore, the decision in shanmugam's case would not be applicable and/or cannot be pressed into service. 23.5. furthermore, in shanmugam's case, aneeta hada's decision has been referred to which - 114 - nc:2024. khc:38869 crl.p no. ..... which substantially affects the right of the parties cannot be said to be an interlocutory order . in madhu limaye v. state of maharashtra [(1977) 4 scc551:1978. scc (cri) 10 : (1978) 1 scr749 a three-judge bench of this court has held an order rejecting the plea of the accused on a point which when accepted will conclude ..... 33596]. unsuccessfully. hence the instant slp.25. the question whether the respondent had sufficient cause for not filing the complaint against dakshin within the period prescribed under the act is not examined by either of the courts below. as rightly pointed out, the application, which is the subject-matter of the instant appeal purportedly filed invoking section .....

Sri Viveka P K Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

- 1 - NC:2024. KHC:36345 CRL.P No.1364 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE3D DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION No.1364 OF2023BETWEEN:1. SRI VIVEKA P. K., S/O KAVERAPPA P. M., AGED ABOUT34YEARS R/AT NO.338, NEAR RTO OFFICE BELEGADDE, SAKLESHPUR TALUK SAKLESHPUR, HASSAN DISTRICT PIN 573 134.2. SMT. NAILA W/O KAVERAPPA P. M., AGED ABOUT54YEARS R/AT NO.330, RAGHAVENDRANAGAR BELEGADDE, SAKLESHPUR TALUK SAKLESHPUR, MARANAHALLI HASSAN DISTRICT PIN 573 134.3. SRI KAVERAPPA P. M., S/O LATE MADAPPA AGED ABOUT65YEARS R/AT NO.330, RAGHAVENDRANAGAR BELEGADDE, SAKLESHPUR TALUK SAKLESHPUR, MARANAHALLI HASSAN DISTRICT PIN 573 134.4. SMT. AKKAMMA SOMANNA W/O P. M., SOMANNA - 2 - NC:2024. KHC:36345 CRL.P No.1364 of 2023 AGED ABOUT74YEARS R/AT HARANAHALLI HOBLI PERIYAPATNA TALUK NILAVADI POST, SUNKADAHALLI MYSORE 571 102.5. SRI DEELIP SOMANNA S/O P.M.SOMANNA AGED ABOUT50YEARS R/AT HARANAHALLI HOBLI PERIYAPATNA TALUK ...