Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: press council act 1978 chapter ii establishment of the press council Page 15 of about 2,688 results (0.140 seconds)

Sessions Judge Vs. Perumal and anr. and the Additional Sessions Judge

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1974)1MLJ105

..... was inserted by the code of criminal procedure (amendment) act, 1923 (act xviii of 1923). act xviii of 1923 was published in the gazette of india on 14th april. 1923. section 164 of act xviii of 1923 stated : this act shall come into force on such date as the governor-general in council may, by notification in the gazette of india appoint ..... .the decision in emperor v. lakhi sahu : air1932cal482 states that section 29-b of the code of criminal procedure, came into force on 1st september 1923. thus the madras children act had come into force on 29th june, 1920 ..... should also bear the same interpretation. i looked up the statement of objects and reasons, the report of the select committee, and the debate in the madras legislative council with reference to the provisions corresponding to sections 18, 19 and 20. i find that they agree with the interpretation placed by me and do not at all suggest .....

Shivkumar Alias Shiwalamal Narumal Chugwani Proprietor of Kanhaiya Gen ...

Court : Mumbai

..... this court in the judgment with reference to the working of the food and drugs department and the other implementing agencies under the seeds act, the insecticides act and the drugs & cosmetics act in the state of maharashtra.copy of this judgment shall also be sent to ministry of law and justice, government of india, new ..... respondent is wholly misconceived and shows how casually the food & drugs department and its officials are implementing the law. when the various provisions of food adulteration act and the rules thereunder require compliance to be made within stipulated period at every stage, no delay muchless administrative delay can be an excuse for the ..... liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly.provided that nothing contained in this subsection shall render any such person liable to any punishment under this act if he proves that the offence was committed without his knowledge and that he exercised all due diligence to prevent the commission of such offence.(2) .....

Phatu Rochiram Mulchandani Vs. Kar.indusl.Area Devt.Board and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... has given guarantees to the financial institutions for the loan advances to the company. however, we leave the matter at that, as counsel for the respondents did not press the issue of maintainability very seriously.19. in so far as the dispute on merits is concerned, it has various facets which give rise to the following questions: ..... co. ltd. v. new quality bobbin works; 1973 (43) company cases 131, holding that the most important task assigned to the liquidator under the companies act while acting as liquidator of a company ordered to be wound up is to collect assets of the company and sell them and to distribute the realization amongst all those who ..... or use of land and building contrary to terms of holding. section 34 a provides for demolition or alteration of unauthorized construction or alteration. section 35 of the act enables a person authorized by the board to enter upon any land for the purpose of inspection, survey, measurement, valuation or enquiry. section 41 enables the board .....

Amina Bharatram Vs. Sumant Bharatram and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... where the golden rule, that the words of the statute must prima facie be given their ordinary meaning, fails. the supreme court in harbhajan singh v. press council of india, air2002sc1351cited with approval the speech of lord simon in suthendran v. immigration appeal tribunal, (1976) 3 all er611to the effect parliament is prima ..... in our opinion, the conclusion would be inescapable that when the high court exercises its ordinary original civil jurisdiction in relation to the matters under the family court act, it would be a district court as understood therein. it would, therefore, lose its jurisdiction. 16. learned counsel for the plaintiff ms.malavika rajkotia, advocate ..... 1. the plaintiff, mrs.amina bharatram has filed the suit for maintenance and separate residence under sections 18, 20 & 23 of the hindu adoption & maintenance act, 1956 as well as for permanent and mandatory injunction and declaration, against the four defendants.2. defendant no.1, mr.sumant bharatram is the husband of the .....

Vellore Citizens Welfare Forums Vs. Union of India rep. by its Secreta ...

Court : Chennai

..... repeated directions issued by the supreme court in at least four important cases namely, m.c.mehta v. union of india [1986 (2) scc 176], indian council for enviro legal action v. union of india [1996 (3) scc 212, a.p. pollution control board v. m.v.nayudu [1999 (2) scc ..... , property and the environment. however, the national environment tribunal, which had a very limited mandate, was not established. the national environment appellate authority act, 1997 was enacted to establish the national environment appellate authority to hear appeals with respect to restriction of areas in which any industries, operations or ..... of environmental pollution; (xi) establishment or recognition of environmental laboratories and institutes to carry out the functions entrusted to such environmental laboratories and institutes under this act; (xii) collection and dissemination of information in respect of matters relating to environmental pollution; (xiii) preparation of manuals, codes or guides relating to the .....

Rajendra Diwan Vs. Pradeep Kumar Ranibala

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... a bill for presidential assent and consequential grant of presidential assent, tantamounts to special agreement between the government of india and the state government, because the president acts on the aid and advice of the council of ministers.82. a special agreement, in our considered view means, an independent agreement arrived at between the government of india and the government of a ..... counsel argued that, as per article 74 of the 19. constitution, the president is to act as per the aid and advice of the council of ministers. to strengthen his argument that the president cannot act independently, but can only act on the aid and advice of his council of ministers, counsel cited samsher singh vs. the state of punjab and anr. reported in air1974sc2192 .....

Central Council For Indian Medicine Vs. Karnataka Ayurveda Medical Col ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... are concerned, the procedure relating to the recognition of medical colleges as well as admission therein was governed by the indian medicine central council act, 1970 (hereinafter referred to as the 1970 act ), which was amended in 2003, to incorporate sections 13 a, 13 b and 13 c, which provided the procedure for establishing ..... regulations were made by the appellant in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (j) of section 36 of the indian medicine central council act, 1970 (hereinafter referred to as the said act ) with the previous sanction of the central government. she submitted that the 2016 regulations prescribe the requirements of minimum standard for grant of ..... has opened a new or higher course of study or training or increased the admission capacity on or 16 before the commencement of the indian medicine central council (amendment) act, 2003, such person or medical college, as the case may be, shall seek, within a period of three years from the said commencement, permission .....

The Municipal Council, Malkapur and anr. Vs. the State of Maharashtra ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1977Bom244

..... municipal property, funds, contracts and liabilities etc. chapter xxiii, in which section 313 appears, then deals with control over the municipal council constitution under the act. section 306 of the act empowers the director or the collector or any officer of the government authorised by the state government in that behalf to inspect and ..... thereafter, according to the petitioners, the director of municipal administration ordered an inquiry against the president shri purohit under section 311 of the act. shri purohit and the municipal council challenged the said order before this court by filing awrit petition being special civil appln. no. 610 of 1972 and it appears from ..... shaikh, respondent no. 2, and a letter addressed, to the manager of government central press, bombay, dated 29-11-1973 which is also signed by respondent no. 2 shri shaikh, it appears that the government central press was directed to print copies of extraordinary gazette to be dated 15th december 1973 and supply in .....

Basantibai Fakirchand Khetan and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1984Bom366; 1984MhLJ534

..... for levy of repairs and reconstruction cess on the building and it is to be collected by the municipal corporation or municipal council and to be paid over to the authority under the act. section 93 enables the authority 96 requires the authority to pay compensation as provided under chap. v. section 97 requires the ..... prejudice whatsoever because of notices being issued the name of deceased mohanlal. survey no.28 of village bhushi was not notified for acquisistion, but this submission was not pressed on may 15, 1981.4. the main thrust of submission in support of the petition is that subsection (3) of s. 44 of the petition is ..... populace for housing accommodation for economically weaker section low income economically weaker, section low income group and middle income group . for the purpose of dated august 3, 1978 and feb. 10 1979 in the local newspaper inviting application for housing accommodation from general public. after having assessed the requirements respondent, 2,by letter date sept .....

Ashok Organics Industries Ltd. Vs. Dena Bank and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [2007]135CompCas203(Bom)

..... p. ltd. : (2005)8scc219 . the above judgment is followed in a later decision of the supreme court reported in jay engineering works ltd. v. industry facilitation council [2006] 133 comp cas 670 : air 2006 scw 4783 wherein the supreme court was considering the effect of section 32 of the sica along with section 22(1 ..... the company and the like. the provisions pertaining to reconstruction and amalgamation need not be referred to in details.29. the sick industrial companies (special provisions) act is, as rightly contended by mr. khambatta, enacted in public interest and contains special provisions. its statement of objects and reasons reads thus:the ill effects ..... a company which has invoked the jurisdiction of board for industrial and financial reconstruction (bifr), the authority set up under the sick industrial companies (special provisions) act, 1985 (sica). it is contended that ashok organics industries ltd., has made a reference and upon this reference hearing took place on july 18, 2005. .....