Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: president s pension act 1951 Page 99 of about 38,537 results (0.167 seconds)

indra Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Patna

..... constituency, electors of which have been supplied with identity cards under the provisions of the registration of electors rules, i960., the elector shall produce his identity card before the presiding officer or the polling officer authorised by him in this behalf.'37. (2) if any elector-- (a) refuses to allow his left forefinger to be inspected or ..... as has been done in the cases relating to fixation of cut off date, namely, by withholding an exemption clause in a taxing statute or enhancing rates of pension/benefits to the employees and so on. here the appropriate authority under the constitution has by notification made the statutory rule relating to the election applicable to certain ..... a mark on his thumb or any other finger or does not produce on demand his identity card before the presiding officer or a polling officer of the polling station. sub-section (c) of section 61 of the said act is set out below:- '(c) for prohibiting the delivery of any ballot paper to any person for voting .....

Somanath Misra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1969Ori37; 34(1968)CLT1026; (1969)IILLJ308Ori

..... the indian administrative service in the public interest on the expiry of three months' notice from the date of service of notice on him.new delhi, by order of the president 15th may, 1967.sd. p. k. dave. jt. secretary to the govt. of india4. the facts leading to the passing of the impugned central government order of ..... the provisions of article 311, two conditions must be fulfilled, namely that the officer should have attained an age at which he can hope to get the benefits of pension after a reasonably lone span of service; and secondly that the period of qualifying service must be so reasonably fixed that premature retirement may not take place at too ..... article 309 of the constitution which abridges the power of the executive to act under article 162 without a law; if there is a statutory rule or act the executive must abide by that act or rule. in the present case, there is nothing in the government of india's instructions which is inconsistent or in any way in conflict with the .....

State of Rajasthan and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1977SC1361; (1977)3SCC592; [1978]1SCR1

..... it is true that the state, like the british monarch, never dies. a legislative assembly may be dissolved, a council of ministers may go out of power, the president's rule may be introduced or imposed, or an emergency may be declared which can conceivably affect the states' power in matters legislative and executive. the state survives these ..... which may form the basis of the presidential satisfaction under article 356(1) of the constitution. indeed, the usual practice is that the president acts under article 356(1) of the constitution only on the governor's report. but, the use of the words 'or otherwise' (in article 356) show that presidential satisfaction could be based on other material ..... been considered by this court to be a property-see state of m.p. v. ranojirao shinde and anr- : [1968]3scr489 . even if it is considered as a pension as the same is payable under law namely article 291, the same is property-see madhaorao phalke v. state of madhya bharat- : [1961]1scr957 .222. it is .....

Shri Kirshna Gyanoday Sugar Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC3436; [2003(2)JCR183(SC)]; 2003(2)SCALE226; (2003)4SCC378; [2003]2SCR75

..... & co. and ors., : [1996]3scr721 , and state of gujarat and anr. v. raman lal keshav lal soni and ors., : (1983)illj284sc .35. in chairman, railway board's case, the point that arose for considerationwas whether pension as admissible under the rules in force at the time ofretirement could be retrospectively reduced. this court held the same asunreasonable and arbitrary and, therefore, violative ..... /85, 1600/86, 1487/86 & 1260/86.1. the bihar sugar undertakings [acquisition] act, 1976 [bihar act xiii of1977] [hereinafter referred to as 'the act'] was passed by the state legislatureand received the assent of the president on june 4, 1977 and was published inthe gazette on june 30, 1977. the act was to provide for acquisition andtransfer of certain sugar undertakings in the state .....

Manubhai Paragji Vashi Vs. the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa and ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(4)ALLMR135; 2007(1)BomCR849; (2007)109BOMLR17

..... members, irrespective of, as to whether the voter casts the second preference or other preference votes.in shradhadevi's case (supra), adverting to the provisions of the representation of the peoples act, the apex court while construing the provisions of the rules under that act, held that while exercising preferences, it is obligatory in order to render the ballot paper valid to ..... india has been conferred, as a part of it's functions, to make rules for the election of its members under section 7(1)(k). insofar as the power to make rules, the power conferred under section 49, is in respect of act and not in respect of any chapter under the advocates act, 1961. the power to make rule includes, the ..... with section 6(1)(g) of the said act, it is the state bar council that has to provide for election of its members.9. on behalf of the bar council of india, mr. s. radhakrishna, secretary, has filed an affidavit. it is pointed out that under sub-rule (h) of rule 2 in part-3, chapter-i of the .....

B. Meenakshi Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(2)ALD96; 2002(2)ALT473

..... in making admissions, the university and colleges are required to follow the a.p. educational institutions (regulation of admission) order, 1974, which was promulgated by the president of india in exercise of the powers conferred under classes 1 and 2 of the article 371(d) of the constitution of india. section 15 enables the government ..... the petitioners also have not placed any specific rule which applies to them conferring such a condition of service. appointment, probation, suspension, seniority, promotion, disciplinary proceeding, pension, provident fund etc., are conditions of service. the mere status of belonging to a particular government service or the service of local authority does not by itself create ..... to reconstruct. 35. in b.r kapur v. state of t.n., (2001) 7 scc 231, (jayalialtha's case), a submission was made that sub-section (4) of section 8 of the representation of peoples act, 1951 requires reading down to so as to apply the same to a non-legislator and to render the same .....

The Bank of Nova Scotia Vs. Rpg Transmission Limited

Court : Delhi

Reported in : II(2005)BC265; [2006]133CompCas172(Delhi); (2005)3CompLJ287(Del); 115(2004)DLT453; 2005(79)DRJ214; [2005]64SCL261(Delhi)

..... referring to the aforesaid decision, the supreme court in the case of allahabad bank (supra) observed as follows in paragraph 31 of the judgment:-'the appellant's case under the rdb act - with an additional section like section 34 - is on a stronger footing for holding that leave of the company court is not necessary under section 537 ..... it was submitted on behalf of the two banks, namely, the bank of nova scotia and icici bank limited, that winding up proceedings under the companies act and rdb act are two distinct proceedings which are not alternative to each other. it was submitted that the prayer in the winding up petition is for winding up of ..... the rdb act, which covers the entire field. thereforee, there could be no dispute with the proposition of law laid down in the decisions of the supreme court in custodian, evacuee property, punjab and ors. v. jafran begum : [1967]3scr736 ; firm of illuri subbayya chetty and sons v. state of andhra pradesh : [1963]50itr93(sc) ; m/s kamala .....

Collector of Bombay Vs. Burjor Hormusji Poonegar and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1964Bom7; (1963)65BOMLR191; ILR1963Bom715

..... company, and the east india company itself had granted some other lands including those reclaimed from the sea to different persons on different tenures, such as pension-and-tax and foras tenures, and that the occupants of lands despite the abolition of the tenures on which they were held continued to be liable to ..... that although thecentral government was exempt from paying anyland revenue to the provincial government by reason of the provisions of section 154 of the government of india act, 1935, the respondents immediately on acquisition of those lands from thecentral government became liable to pay the landrevenue to the provincial government; and itcould not ..... be apprehended and confined in the civil jail under the rules in force at the presidency for the confinement of debtors, for which purpose a certificate of demand under the collector's signature sent with the defaulter shall be the sheriff's sufficient warrant, equally with the usual legal process in ordinary cases of arrest in .....

Yeshwantrao Kankarrao Gadakh Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1998(3)ALLMR110; 1998(3)BomCR139

..... -1997.15. the name of the petitioner came to be removed from the voters list solely on account of the order of disqualification passed by the president of india under section 8-a of the 1951 act and he must be deemed to be reinstated in the voters list forthwith on expiry of the period of disqualification. however, in the instant case ..... date of the conviction or from the date on which the order takes effect, be disqualified for voting at any election. (2) any person disqualified by a decision of the president under sub-section (1) of section 8-a for any period shall be disqualified (or the same period for voting at any election. (3) the decision of the ..... commission has been annexed to the petition at exhibit a. accordingly, on 10th june 1994 a notification came to be issued by the ministry of law, justice and company affair's of the government of india, disqualifying the petitioner for a period of four years i.e. from 10th november, 1993 to 18th november, 1997. it appears that pursuant to .....

Singam Satyanarayana Vs. Election Officer and Deputy Chief Executive O ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2005(4)ALD780; 2005(4)ALT645

..... respondent, petitioner filed a petition before the second respondent to take action against them under the a.p. panchayat raj (conduct of election of members (co-opted) and president/vice-president of mandal parishads and members (co-opted) and chairman/vice chairman of zilla parishads) rules, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as the rules) whereupon second respondent issued show ..... 1-10-2004 in his proceedings no. b1/3317/2004-v2 holding that respondents 3 to 8 have incurred disqualification under sections 153 and 181 of the panchayat raj act, 1994 (the act) and declared that they ceased to be the mptcs of shameerpet mandal. questioning the said order, third respondent filed w.p. no. 18357 of 2004. g. ..... petitioner and respondents 3 to 8, for the purpose of tenth schedule to the constitution of india.7. copy of the communication no. 56/ 117/2001-j.s.iii/2714 of the election commission of india dated 21-8-2001 is produced by the petitioner. the genuineness of the same is not disputed by any of the .....