Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: president s pension act 1951 Page 4 of about 38,537 results (0.207 seconds)

Sita Ram Yadava Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1996SC920; 1995(6)SCALE335; 1995Supp(4)SCC618; 1996(1)LC4(SC)

..... finally recorded the finding that it was the appellant who was convicted under the opium act. the proceedings were forwarded to the president of india for final orders. the president proposed the provisional punishment of withholding the petitioner's pension permanently and not disbursing death-cum-retirement gratuity to him. accordingly, a show ..... cause notice dated august 23, 1985 was issued to the appellant and he submitted his reply. the union public service commission was consulted which approved the proposed punishment. finally the president passed the ..... tribunal, allahabad (the tribunal) dated july 18, 1990 upholding the order of the president of india under rule 9 of the central civil service (pension) rules, 1972 (the pension rules) withholding the entire monthly pension admissible to the appellant and also denying the death-cum-retirement gratuity to which the .....

T.N. Sukumaran Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Reported in : (2003)(1)SLJ252CAT

..... representation, if any. he submitted annexure a22 representation on 13.8.98. thereafter the order in the name of the president dated 2.7.99 (annexure a23) deciding to cut 50% of the applicant's pension for the period of 5 years was issued. thereafter pursuant to the annexure a23 order the 8 respondent by letter dated ..... to consider the provisions of rule 9 very carefully. rule 9 of the railway services (pension) rules is extracted below:-- "9. right of the president to withhold or withdraw pension--(1) the president reserves to himself the right of withholding or withdrawing a pension or gratuity, or both, either full or in part, whether permanently or for a specified ..... -s.i dated 14.6.1999 is enclosed. after taking all the facts and circumstances of the case into account, the president has observed that all the charges levelled against sh. sukumaran are proved on the basis of oral and documentary evidence on record, and has therefore, decided that a cut of 50% in the pension otherwise .....

Malone Vs. White Motor Corp.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... in any way the complex interrelationships between employees, employers and unions; obviously, much of this is left to the states." motor coach employees v. lockridge, 403 u. s. 274 , 403 u. s. 289 (1971). the pension act "leaves much to the states, though congress has refrained from telling us how much. we must spell out from conflicting indications of congressional will the area in ..... product of collective bargaining. because the 1958 disclosure act was in effect at the time of the crucial events in this case, the expression of congressional intent included therein should control the decision here. [ footnote 7 ] page 435 u. s. 506 congressional consideration of the problems in the pension field began in 1954, after the president sent a message to congress recommending that "congress .....

Pramatha Nath Mitter and Ors. Vs. Hon'ble the Chief Justice of the Hig ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1961Cal545,65CWN920

..... the following manner.8. in the first place, reference is made to the statement of the objects and reasons of the high court judges (conditions of service) act 1954 and its amending act 48 of 1958 which received the president's assent on 17th december, 1958, and was published in the gazette of india on the following day. this amending ..... article 221 of the constitution is mentioned there. it is argued, therefore, at the bar that article 221(2) of the constitution only mentions (1) leave of absence, (2) pensions, and (3) allowances and rights of the 2nd schedule. 'vacation of high courts' does not come under any of these three heads. it is neither (1) leave of absence ..... can be regarded as one having any relation with or any bearing on the questions of salaries or allowances, leave of absence, or pensions of judges which were the principal topics dealt with by the original act 28 of 1954, the new prevision affects not merely the judges of the high court but the high court in general. besides .....

United States Vs. Hall

Court : US Supreme Court

..... of one year, under such regulation as the president may direct. 1 stat. 95. before that provision expired, to-wit, on the 5th of july of the next year, congress enacted that military pensions granted and paid by the states in pursuance of former acts of congress, page 98 u. s. 347 or of acts passed in the then present session, to invalids ..... laws making it an offense punishable in the national courts to detain from a military pensioner any portion of a sum collected in his behalf as his pension. united states v. fairchilds, 1 abb. (u.s.) 74; s.c. 16 am.law reg. 306. pensioners were forbidden by the act of july 29, 1848, to pledge the certificate by anticipation to an agent ..... beyond the time when the money was received by the agent, attorney, or guardian of the pensioner. payment of pensions under the second section of the act page 98 u. s. 352 passed the next year might be made to the widow of the deceased pensioner or to her attorney, or, if he left no widow or no one then living, to .....

Gururao Shrinivas Heblikar Vs. Secretary of State for India

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1916Bom109; (1917)19BOMLR117

..... the merits, it is contended that the suit is barred by the revenue jurisdiction act and the pensions act.15. i shall first deal with the merits of the plaintiff's claim, as it seems to me that if he can succeed on the merits the revenue jurisdiction act and the pensions act will not afford any answer to his claim.16. now it is well established ..... lands and they were continued in possession of the lands without any liability to pay the royal share of the revenue.18. it is also a settled rule in this presidency that in the case of an inam, where the grant is merely of the royal share of the revenue and not of the soil resumption means only the discontinuance of ..... beyond his life-time.40. it seems to me on an examination of these decisions that the view taken by sir charles sargent c.j. in ganpatrao's case has been accepted in this presidency and must be given effect to.41. i am therefore unable to accept the opinion of the learned district judge that in the case of a saranjam .....

Bhawani Singh Vs. State and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2003(3)Raj1755; 2002(5)WLN269

..... s liability, workmen's compensation, invalidity and old age pensions and maternity benefits under item no. 24 of the concurrent list. as the impugned provision of the state act are incompatible with and repugnant to the central legislation, the law made by the state legislature cannot operate unless such law was reserved for and received the president's ..... assent before its promulgation. the same having not been done, the provisions fall within the province of article 254 of the constitution and cannot operate so far as they are inconsistent with the provisions contained in central act relating to industrial disputes ..... security and social insurance (entry 23) employment and unemployment, welfare of labour including conditions of work, provident funds, employers' liability, workmen's compensation, invalidity and old age pension and maternity benefits (entry 24). 76. reference in this connection may be made to bangalore water supply and sewerage board v. a. .....

Smt. S. Zeenath Basha Vs. the Chairman, Railway Board, Rail Bhavan, Mi ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

..... cause notice nor pleaded about the discrepancy. respondents have stated that recovery from pension relief is not covered by the pension act in terms of est.srl.no.244/85 and mopr para 15and4(i)(iii) and that the letter dated 15.9.1998 was an opportunity given to the applicant's husband and cannot be taken under purview of danda rules. it was ..... than the memorandum issued by respondent no.2 conveying government's displeasure, the applicant's husband did not receive any other order issued by the president of india withholding or withdrawing his pension or gratuity or both, either in full or in part, and ordering recovery from pension or gratuity. in fact the chief personnel officer, s.e. railway, had mentioned in his letter dated 12 .....

Shankar Baluram Ladehllu Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2007)(1)SLJ316CAT

..... paid as salary and allowances with effect from 1.11.1992 to 18.6.2003. (6) respondents are restrained from recovery of rs. 13,20,329 from applicant's pension and other retiral dues. (7) respondents are directed to comply with above directions forthwith and in any case not later than 02 months from the date of communication of ..... . v. income tax commissioner, karnataka-i, bangalore 7. ...the circulars or instructions given by the board are not doubt binding in law on the authorities under the act but when the supreme court or the high court has declared the law on the question arising for consideration it will not be open to a court to direct that ..... despite the fact that the respondents were in possession of all relevant papers including the service sheet/record of the applicant. it was the responsibility of the respondents to act in accordance with the record and appellant can not be penalised for their mistake. further, under chapter 7 of the aforesaid rules, all the actions are to be .....

Brown Vs. Dept. of Law and Pub. Safety

Court : US Supreme Court

..... 54 began filing with the commission the annual registration statement required by 93(a) of the act. following a lengthy investigation, the division in 1981 reported to the commission that, in its view, local 54's president gerace, secretary-treasurer robert lumio, and grievance manager frank materio were disqualified under the criteria of ..... seeking to represent casino hotel employees must register with the commission annually, and must disclose the names of its officers, agents, affiliated organizations, and pension and welfare funds. appellees have not shown that this requirement of registration imposes any burden on them. indeed, they effectively concede that this 93(a ..... it from performing its functions as the employees' chosen bargaining agent. also, the issue of the validity of 93's second sanction -- prohibition of a union's administration of its pension or welfare funds cannot be decided now, despite the court of appeals' holding that the sanction is expressly preempted by .....