Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: president s pension act 1951 Court: karnataka Page 9 of about 1,816 results (0.099 seconds)

P. Janardhana Shetty Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [1970(20)FLR355]; ILR1969KAR581; (1970)IILLJ738Kant; (1970)1MysLJ191

..... to their dismissal or removal from service. accordingly, the conciliation officer issued to the petitioner and respondent 4 in each of these petitions notices under s. 12(1) of the act, read with rule 10 of the industrial disputes (mysore) rules 1957 requiring them to attend the proceedings before him. feeling aggrieved by such notices ..... and employers ranged on opposite sides on some general questions on which each group is bound together by a community of interests such as wages, bonuses, allowances pensions, provident fund, number of working hours per week, holidays and so on. even with reference to a business that is carried on, we would hardly ..... retrenchment or termination of services, which had already taken place at a time when the employers were under no statutory liability to be subjected to adjudication under the act, should now be subjected a new liability in respect of such discharge, dismissal, retrenchment or termination of services which had already happened. (iii) section 2a .....

Newspapers and Periodicals Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1981(2)KarLJ577; (1982)ILLJ189Kant

..... in the matter by the labour court otherwise by issuing a notice to the employer and hearing him, what is it that the government decides acting under sub-s (2) of s. 17 of the act can it decide the question that x was not a news-paper employee a working journalist or can it decide that the amount claimed was ..... making reference to the labour court. 11. now, to consider the other ground of attack, counsel for the petitioner says that a reference made under sub-s. (2) of s. 17 of the act entails civil consequences and, therefore, reference made, in the instant case, without hearing his clients, was void having been arrived at in violation of the ..... claim of the 4th respondent.6. the petitioners are challenging the impugned order of reference (annexure-p) mainly on two grounds, namely : (1) the sub-s. (2) of s. 17 of the act, under which the impugned order has been made by the state government itself, is unconstitutional and void offending art. 14 of the constitution, conferring, as it does .....

Asif Alim Sait and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1999KAR2391; 2000(4)KarLJ280

..... when there is nothing in a statutory provision which debars the application of principles of natural justice when the authorities exercise the statutory power under the act the principles of natural justice would apply unless the statutory provisions point to the contrary; and statutory provisionsthemselves are not unconstitutional though the notification issued under ..... issued notice annexure-b, dated 6th of january, 1989 purporting to exercise the power conferred on it under sub-section (1) of section 185 of the act directing the petitioners to demolish the offending portion of the construction put up by the petitioners as specified in the said notice; and aggrieved by the said ..... of government of mysore and others v j.v. bhat, scheduled caste and weaker section welfare association (regd.) and another v state of karnataka and others, s.k. bhargava v collector, chandigarh and jagadish patil v state of karnataka and others . secondly, he submitted that if, for any reason, the granting of .....

P. Ramesh Baipadithaya Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

..... himself declared as hereditary trustee of the said temple by making an application to the deputy commissioner, dakshina kannada, mangalore as provided under section 57 of the act and he continued as a trustee of the said temple, without the knowledge of the petitioner, though the father of the petitioner was entitled for the said ..... bhat, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in the given set of circumstances, since there is unimpeachable evidence in favour of the petitioner that the petitioner's father was appointed as a trustee/muktesar in the year 1929 his application also be considered for appointment as a muktesar.4. mr. b.n. prasad, learned ..... to consider the representation of the petitioner does not arise. if such a direction is giver to consider his representation, it would be virtually opening a pandora's box and a leverage would be given to the petitioner to exercise his rights in respect of stale and lost claim. the petitioner cannot be permitted to .....

Manikrao Patil Vs. Bapu Rao Patil and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1973Kant271; AIR1973Mys271

..... petition relative to corrupt practices. 16. in essence, paragraph 4.1 of the petition refers to appeal to language falling under section 123(3) of the r. p. act. the material allegations are: '......... the respondent exploited the issue for his own purpose by exceeding the limits of the political issue and making it a language issue in ..... a declaration (that any candidate other than the returned candidate is duly elected) is claimed in accordance with the provisions of section 97 of the r. p. act. the proviso to the said section prescribes the conditions precedent to be complied with by the returned candidate or such other party who desires to lead evidence in support ..... of such reference to the language of the petitioner in any of the pamphlets in question. that such an act to constitute a corrupt practice within the meaning of section 123(3) the appeal must be based on the candidate's language, and not if consideration of language is made an issue in an election. there is support for .....

Karnataka Sugar Workers Federation (R), Rep. by Its President Vs. Stat ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2003KAR2531; 2003(4)KarLJ453; (2003)IIILLJ502Kant

..... shops and commercial establishments act, payment of wages act, workmen's compensation act, employees' state insurance act, are exercising their power to adjudicate the dispute pertaining to various labour matters in spite of the fact that they are not qualified as district judge. yet, they are functioning as presiding officers. be that as it may. the other argument ..... the kcs act with a restriction that once the forum was chosen, the same should be pursued to the logical end and had the effect of exhausting the remedy. this view continued to hold the field till the decision rendered by the division bench in m/s. veerashaiva co-operative bank ltd. v. presiding officer, ..... . no other point was argued before us.33. as discussed and for the reasons stated above, the decision of this court in m/s. veerashaiva co-operative bank limited v. presiding officer, labour court and ors. (supra) does not require any reconsideration. the matters are referred to learned single judge for deciding the cases .....

Sugalabai Vs. Gundappa A. Maradi and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2007KAR4790; 2008(2)KarLJ406

..... that the proviso to article 254(2) empowers the union parliament to repeal or amend a repugnant state law even though it has become valid by virtue of the president's assent and though the subsequent law made by the parliament does not expressly repeal the state law, even then, the state law will become void as soon as the ..... to a state law under article 254(2) does not confer irrevocable immunity to the state law from the operation of the rule of repugnancy. the fact that the president's assent has been obtained for a state law under clause (2) of article 254 will not make it immune from attack for repugnancy to a subsequent parliamentary enactment. ..... central act in their applicability to that state only. the predominance of the state law may however be taken away if parliament legislates under the proviso to clause (2). the proviso to article 254(2) empowers the union parliament to repeal or amend a repugnant state law even though it has become valid by virtue of the president's assent- .....

R.L. Jalappa S/O. R. Laxminarayanappa (Senior Citizen Not Claimed) Mem ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2010CriLJ366; ILR2010KAR4000.

..... not maintainable as it is not shown as to how any legal right of the petitioner is affected. the order under challenge is at best the consequence of the petitioner's own act and he is responsible for the same. the grant of consent by the advocate general to initiate action for criminal contempt of court is an administrative ..... advocate general in the matter of according consent under section 15(1)(b) of the act. grant or refusal of consent by the advocate general under section 15 of the act, was not justiciable.(ii) reliance is placed on the opinion of justice s. ranganathan in p.n. duda's case (supra) -whereby the types of action which the attorney general may take when ..... of consent grew up. reference is drawn to the observations of sarkaria j in s.k. sarkar v. v.c. misra : air 1981 sc 723, to the effect that the whole object of prescribing these procedural modes of taking cognizance under section 15 of the act was to safeguard the valuable lime of the high court or the supreme court being .....

The Commissioner, Bangalore Development Authority and anr. Vs. State o ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2006KAR318; 2006(1)KarLJ1

..... overruled.39. from the foregoing discussions it is clear bda is not a municipality. bda act is not a law relating to panchayats or municipalities. the president's assent is not required. it is a special legislation. though section 73 of the said act has an overriding effect, it cannot override the provisions of the constitution, but it certainly ..... has overriding effect on other laws passed by the state legislature. none of the provisions of the bda act are inconsistent with parts ..... parliament insofar as it is inconsistent with the law made by the state legislature should prevail. in that view of the matter, as the bda act has not received the assent of the president, all those provisions and in particular section 5-a of the la should prevail over the provisions of the bda .....

Bhairavasingh Malojirao Ghorpade and anr. Vs. Shankar Rao Bindu Rao Pa ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1976Kant164; ILR1976KAR1279; 1976(1)KarLJ418

..... barred under that section. in (1893) ilr 17 bom 169 (jilaji pratapji raje v. balakrishna mahdeo) the suit bad been instituted without a certificate under the pensions act (xxiii. of 1871). it was held that the suit was not bad ab initio but that the court is only precluded by taking cognizance of it until the ..... it would not have been granted. the decision of the supreme court was rendered on 15-12-1070 striking down the president's ordinance. the plaintiff could not anticipate that the ordain, once issued by the president would be declared illegal when be instituted the suit. hence, to require the plaintiff to have obtained the certificate before the ..... india) reads as follows: -'in accordance with the opinion of the majority the petitions are allowed and writs will issue declaring that the orders made by the president on september 6, 1970 challenged here, were illegal and on that account inoperative and the petitioners will be entitled to all their pre-existing rights and privileges .....