Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: president s pension act 1951 Court: chennai Page 7 of about 1,579 results (0.107 seconds)

Manikkam Chettiar and ors. Vs. Krishnappa Chettiar

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1942Mad382; (1942)1MLJ24

..... cannot be assessed again on their share of the income of the firm. the principle laid down in davies v, president of the madras municipal commissioner i.l.r.(1890) mad. 140 has been treated as applicable under the new district municipalities act in narasimha rao v. chairman municipal council, narasaraopet (1934) 68 m.l.j. 162 it does not appear ..... which as such firm has been separately assessed to profession-tax.3. assuming for the moment that the personal income assessed to profession-tax together with the party's share in the firm's income which has been taxed, would, in the case of each of these defendants, if added together, be sufficient to bring them within the limit laid down ..... to disqualify him under proviso (b). there was also filed an extract from the profession tax demand register (ex. d-l) which showed that in 1936-37 the firm of s. m. p. c, k. chidambaram (rounder was assessed on a half yearly income of rs. 360 and the plaintiff gave evidence that the 1st defendant was a partner .....

Dhanalakshmi Vs. Karuppusamy

Court : Chennai

..... capacity. at p. 577 to 578 of the report, this court dealt with the effect of section 6 of the hindu succession act, 1956 and the commentary made by mulla, 15th edn., pp. 924-26 as well as mayne's hindu law, 12th edn. pp. 918-19. shri banerji relied on the said observations of mayne on hindu law, 12th edn., ..... the courts below were not justified in doubting the genuineness of the will.31. the first appellate court's observation that the scribe of the will was not examined is neither here nor there. nowhere under section 68 of the indian evidence act, examination of the scribe is contemplated. if at all the attesting witnesses are not available, then while ..... and another vs. p.s.rama rao pisey and others) (xix) (2008) 8 mlj 64.(thayammal vs. ponnusamy and another) among the aforesaid decisions, the decision of this court reported in 2001(3)ctc 28.[corra vedachalam chetty and another vs. g.jankiraman] is on the point that the court while analysing the will is acting as a court of conscience .....

Jampana Somadu Vs. Sri Raja Venkata Ramayya Appa Row Bahadur Zamindar ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1919)36MLJ248

..... that decision was doubted, and ponnusami padayachi v. karuppudayan i.l.r. (1914) m. 843 : 26 m.l.j. 9285 has since been followed by oldfield, j., in president district board tanjore v. kunnusami thondaman. 35 ind.cas. 1214. it is suggested that the defendants who are ryots of 'old waste' are not necessarily non-occupancy ryots within the ..... this suit was brought by the court of wards manager of the estate of mirzapuram on behalf of the minor zemindar, who is a landholder under the madras estates land act (act i of 19 08), to evict the defendants on the expiry of their lease in fasli 1322. in second appeal, three questions were argued: first, whether the land ..... meaning of the proviso to section 153. but this contention is inconsistent with section 6, c1. (3) of the act, and in mr. rama-doss' commentary on the 'estates land act' at page 256 and in mr. krishnamachariar's book at page 195 a category of non-occupancy ryots is given which includes ryots of 'old waste'. from the definition in .....

K. Vadivelu and ors. Vs. the Official Liquidator, Madras

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1971Mad311

..... other legal proceeding against a company in liquidation without the leave of the court. an almost similar expression is found in s. 17 of the presidency towns insolvency act and s. 28(2) of the provincial insolvency act, imposing a ban on creditors, to whom the insolvent is indebted, from commencing any suit or other legal proceeding against ..... the property of the insolvent in respect of the debt except with the leave of the insolvency court. the expression occurring in s. 17 of the presidency towns insolvency act was construed by the bombay high court in re dwarakadas tejbhandas, ilr 40 bom 235 = air 1915 bom 134. as meaning that the ..... the learned judges themselves the sanction contemplated therein is not a condition precedent imposed by any statutory law like the sanction mentioned in s. 92, c. p. code or s. 17 of the presidency towns insolvency act, but is a sanction imposed by the common law to enforce due respect towards courts of justice. in that view, the .....

Mottayappan Alias Selambia Goundan Vs. Palani Goundan and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 20Ind.Cas.924; (1913)25MLJ290

..... operation at all unless a certain event happened.2. the instrument in that case had not been delivered to the grantee. there was, therefore, no completed juristic act. this is in accordance with proviso (8) to section 92 which allows the existence of any oral agreement constituting a condition precedent to the attaching of any ..... the property after the plaintiff's death was confirmed by exhibit ii. we do not understand him to mean ..... exhibit ii, registered patta razinamah executed in favour of the plaintiff's daughter by the plaintiff over a year after the execution of exhibit i show that the latter deed was partially acted upon.' apparently, the judge meant by the statement that exhibit i was partially acted upon, that the intention to give the daughter a title to .....

Raval and Co. and anr. Vs. K.G. Ramachandran (Minor) and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1966)2MLJ68

..... of a tenant whether during a contractual tenancy, or after its determination; so much is not in dispute. such a special act, having received the assent of the president, will prevail over the transfer of property act in the concerned area. if that is the intendment to be gathered from the plain language of the preamble and the structure ..... tenant and rights in or over land, and under article 254(1) and (2), it is not disputed that the madras acts, having received the assent of the president, will prevail over the transfer of property act, to the degree of any inconsistency between the two laws, in madras state. legislative competence thus being conceded, legislative intendment has ..... that reason, the assent of the president under article 254(1) of the constitution was not required to make the statute effective. in siddanna v. venkatesh a.i.r. 1965 mys. 65 a division bench of the mysore high court held, following punjalal's case (1963) 2 s.c.j.441 that under bombay act lvii of 1947 a suit for .....

Jampana Somadu Vs. Sri Raja Venkata Ramaya Appa Row Bahadur Zamindar G ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 50Ind.Cas.946

..... was doubted and ponnuswamy padayachi v. karupudayan 24 ind. cas. 217 : 15 m.l.t. 299 : 1 l.w. 218 has since been followed by oldfield, j., in president, district board, tanjore v. kannuswami thondaman 35 ind. cas. 121.4. it is suggested that the defendants, who are ryots of 'old waste', are not necessarily non-occupancy ryots ..... this suit was brought by the court of wards manager of the estate of mirzapuram on behalf of the minor zemindar, who is a landholder under the madras estates land act (act i of 1908), to evict the defendants on the expiry of their lease in fasli 1322. in second appeal, three questions were argued: first, whether the land in ..... within the meaning of the proviso to section 153. but this contention is inconsistent with section 6, clause (3) of the act, and in mr. ramadoss's commentary on the 'estates land act' at page 256 and in mr. krishnamachariar's book at page 195 a category of non-occupancy ryots is given which includes ryots of 'old waste'. from the definition .....

Selvam Estates Represented by Its Partner Mrs. Mohanasundari Murugan V ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1991)1MLJ421

..... his contention cited a decision in arunagiri mudaliar in re. : air1936mad697 . the above suit was filed by the partners who have not been registered under the partnership act. learned judge held that subsequent suit filed by them after such registration, was not barred under order 23, rule 1(3), c.p.c. learned judge held ..... our high court was also relied on by the learned counsel for the defendants which is t. savariraj pillai v. r.s.s. vastrad and co. : air1990mad198 . sathiadev, j. held that requirements of section 69 of the partnership act are mandatory and the suit filed by a party without complying with the requirements under section 69 of the partnership ..... registration was made and as mentioned in form-a which is maintained under section 59 of the indian partnership act, 1932, only on 16.2.1987. learned counsel for the plaintiff produced a zerox copy of the firm's registration certificate signed by the registrar of firms, madras central. in column 3, date of registration is mentioned .....

Dr.P.Tamilmani Vs. 1.The Central Registrar of Co-opertive Societies,

Court : Chennai

..... 2.the joint registrar of co-operatives, chennai region, saidapet chennai - 15. 3.the board of director the indian medical practitioner's co-operative pharmacy and stores ltd. (impcops), rep. by its president s.bose, b.s.m.s, thiruvanmiyur, chennai - 41. 4.the indian medical practitioners co-operative pharmacy and stores ltd.(impcops), rep. by its secretary / ..... general meeting under the chairmanship of the observer appointed by him immediately in accordance with the relevant 2002 act and the bye-laws of impcops for the purpose of removing 5th respondent-president impcops and 6th respondent, vice president impcops from the primary membership of impcops. in both w.ps !for petitioner : mrs.l. ..... observer has been appointed, who is in the cadre of additional registrar/managing director, tamil nadu state federation for urban co-operative banks, chennai to act as observer for the annual general body meeting and special general body meeting to be convened by the society on 06.08.2014. in the light .....

Dr.Mrs.Rajam Sethuraman Vs. Maha Semam Trust

Court : Chennai

..... trust by the induction of the fourth defendant, who is a henchman of the second defendant as one of the trustees and appointing the son s.ramesh as the vice-president; (x) crores of rupees from the first defendant trust were diverted by the second defendant and his son ramesh to new trusts floated by ..... . there is yet another reason to think that there is collusion. despite taking formal objections to the allegations contained in the plaint, the second defendant has acted very clever by willingly producing some records to the advocate commissioner and withholding many records from him. by refraining from fighting the suit and the miscellaneous applications ..... order xxvi of the code either for examination of witnesses or for making local investigations or for conducting scientific investigation or for the performance of a ministerial act or for the sale of movable property or for examination or adjustment of accounts or for partition of immovable property. the power to issue a commission .....