Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: president s pension act 1951 Court: central administrative tribunal cat mumbai Page 2 of about 11 results (0.211 seconds)

Uma Janku Mohare Vs. Union of India, Through the Secretary, Railway Bo ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Mumbai

..... received against purchase order no.09/91/4013/3/04936 dt.27.8.92 from m/s jasoda industries, howrah with the probable intention to negotiate with the firm for his personal gain. thus by his above acts of commission and/or omission shri u.j. mohare failed to maintain absolute integrity, devotion ..... had superannuated during the pendency of the disciplinary proceedings and the respondents after completion of departmental inquiry had sent a proposal to the competent authority, the president of india with the recommendations of the disciplinary authority. before the penalty could be imposed, the advice of union public service commission was required to be ..... the charge of demand of illegal gratification has been established. in accordance with the above mentioned provisions contained in rule 9(1) of the railway services (pension) rules, 1993 and considering that the applicant had superannuated on 31.05.2000 the presidential order was required to be issued. accordingly, vide the presidential order .....