Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: preservation of trees act 1976 section 9 planting of adequate number of trees Page 2 of about 235 results (0.121 seconds)

The Managing Trustee Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR2006Ker300

..... submits that the above mentioned notification is illegal and the petitioner's properties would not fall within the scope of section 5(1) of the kerala preservation of trees act, 1986.2. detailed counter-affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondents stating that the area in question is a portion of anakkaranam malavaram in ..... cardamom hill reserve and that the area in question is not cultivated with cardamom, in our view, sub-section (1) of section 5 of the kerala preservation of trees act would not apply to the land in question. reference may also be made to the judgment of the learned single judge in kottal avishumma v. state of ..... notifications are private forests. notifications, as we have already indicated, were issued under section 5(1) of the kerala preservation of trees act 1986. the said provision is extracted below for easy reference.5. prohibition of cutting of tree in notified areas: (1) notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force, or in any .....

Rajeev Suri Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... trees. where absolutely necessary, tree transplantation shall be carried out with prior permission from the tree authority constituted as per the delhi 367 preservation of trees act, 1994 (delhi act no.11 of 1994). old trees should be retained based on girth and age regulations and as prescribed by the delhi forest department ..... involve the participation of these departments. xi. the committee then considered the aspect of cutting of trees and noted that such action may be taken only where it is absolutely necessary, that too after prior permission from the tree authority constituted as per the delhi preservation of trees act, 1994. it noted that: (xiii) as committed by the proponent, there shall be no cutting of .....

Tata Tea Ltd., Regional Office Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1998)3MLJ306

..... .1981 issued by the government, even assuming that the said notification had been validly issued. if at all, only the tamil nadu hill areas (preservation of trees) act, 1951 was applicable to the petitioner's land. clause 5 of the grant relied on by the respondents did not in any way authorize the ..... coimbatore for according sanction on merits by the district committee constituted under the tamil nadu hill areas (preservation of trees) act, 1955 (tamil nadu act 17 of 1955) and the tamil nadu preservation of private forests act, 1949 (tamil nadu act 27 of 1949). the district committee will have to impose a condition specifically that the fuel wood ..... the authorities.10. the joint commissioner has stated as follows: since valparai township comes under the purview of tamil nadu preservation of private forests act, 1949 and the tamil nadu hills areas (preservation of trees) act, 1955, every owner of the estate should get the prior permission of the forest committee constituted under the above .....

Hanuman Laxman Aroskar Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... appellants to pursue their remedies. on 6 february 2018, the deputy conservator of forests granted permission for felling 21,703 trees at the airport site. the appellate authority under the goa, daman and diu preservation of trees act 198415 dismissed the appeal on 7 march 2018. 11 on 8 march 2018, the high court of judicature at bombay ..... department. 96 on 6 february 2018, the deputy conservator of forests had granted permission for felling of 21,703 trees. following the dismissal of an appeal under section 15 of the goa, daman and diu preservation of trees act 1984 filed by the federation of rainbow warriors, a writ petition was filed before the bombay high court51. the ..... had a girth of 50 to 100 centimeters; and (iii) only 2,580 trees had a girth exceeding 100 centimeters. the goa, daman and diu preservation of trees act, 1984 defines the expression tree in section 2(j) in the following terms: s. 2(j) - tree means any woody plant whose branches spring from and are supported upon the trunk .....

Victory Export and Import Syndicate Etc. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1986Delhi409; ILR1986Delhi320; 1986RLR472

..... the total amount of timber which is extracted from the walnut trees. (4) it is clear from the perusal of the jammu & kashmir preservation of specified trees act, 1969 (act x of 1969) (hereinafter called the kashmir act), that the walnut trees are specified trees. the walnut trees are unusual trees, growing to the height of 80 to 100 ft. it ..... of walnut logs and stumps from the open market. they were permitted to fell dry, and not non-fruit bearing walnut trees, strictly under the provisions of the j&k; preservations of specified trees act. 1969. on this permission being granted by the concerned authority, it was required by this order that irrevocable letter of ..... ban commitment has to be fulfillled. it has to be assumed that the central government had knowledge of the existence of the jammu & kashmir preservation of specified trees act, 1969. the central government would automatically be aware of the formalities which are required to be complied with in connection of the felling of each .....

Deepak Balkrishna Vahikar and Another Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ...

Court : Mumbai

..... in a rapid deterioration of green areas in the city. the maharashtra (urban areas) protection and preservation of trees act, 1975 (`the act') provides for the establishment of a tree authority in section 3. the tree authority is to consist of a chairperson who is to be the commissioner of the municipal corporation and ..... the effective implementation of the provisions of the maharashtra (urban areas) protection and preservation of trees act, 1975. in exercise of the powers conferred by the act, the state government has framed the maharashtra (urban areas) protection and preservation of trees rules, 2009. 2. the city of pune covers an area of 243.48 ..... 4. i undertake to comply with each and every condition and direction issued by the tree authority and/or tree officer in its true letter and spirit as also with the provisions of the maharashtra (urban area) protection and preservation of trees act, 1975 and the rules framed thereunder. solemnly affirmed at........ ) this....day of........... ) .....

J Adiveppa Babappa Hulasera Vs. Divisional Forest Officer

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1989KAR1228; 1988(3)KarLJ211

..... land grant rules'). they have also sought for a declaration that permission as required under sub-section (4) of section 8 of the karnataka preservation of trees act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the 'trees act') must be deemed to have been granted to them. they have sought for a further direction to respondents 1 and 2 to restrain them ..... a specified period. in case, the petitioners pay the value of the trees as assessed by the authorities of the forest department (respondents 1 and 2) they will be entitled to seek permission to cut and remove the trees under the karnataka preservation of trees act, 1976 and cut and remove the trees as per the permission granted under the said ..... on the lands granted to them. it is only when such right accrues, the question of making an application under section 8 of the trees act for permission to cut and remove the trees will arise. in the instant case, the petitioners have not yet acquired such a right. even if an application is made without a right .....

The Tata Housing Development Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. the Goa Foundation ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC4238; 2003(7)SCALE589; (2003)11SCC714

..... of 3 years on a condition that natural landscape formed by trees as seen from river mandovi was not to be disturbed. thereafter, appellant no. 2 applied to the tree officer for according permission to fell 51 trees standing on the appellants' plot as required under the goa. daman and diu preservation of trees act, 1984. upon the said application, the range forest officer, after making ..... thorough inspection, submitted his report disclosing therein that he found 51 trees thereon all of which were immature and soil was .....

State of Karnataka Vs. Robert D'Silva

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1995KAR2549; 1995(6)KarLJ120

..... take advantage of the deeming provision. we are of the view that such a provision should not be permutes to be on the statute such as the preservation of trees act and that the legislature should consider deleting the same, making alternative provision, safeguarding the interest of the applicants under section 7.20. for all the aforesaid ..... with regard to the deeming provision in section 8(4)(ii) of the trees act. the act was made with a view to provide for the preservation of trees in the state by regulating the felling of trees and for the planting of adequate number of trees to restore ecological balance, in view of the indiscriminate felling of large number ..... to them by virtue of the deeming provision contained in section 8(4)(ii) of the karnataka preservation of trees act, 1976 ('the act' for short) and the rules made thereunder, inasmuch as the tree officer failed to inform them of his decision within one year from the date of receipt of the application by him. they sought .....

The Goa Foundation and Another Vs. the Conservator of Forests and Othe ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1999(2)BomCR695

..... granted permission to fell 32 trees out of 51 trees originally applied for felling vide order dated 9-1-97. on the same day i.e. 9 ..... under survey no. 6/1 admeasuring 16.51 hectares had applied for permission to fell 77 trees under the goa, daman and diu preservation of trees act, 1984. the conservator of forests had taken the plea that the said area in question from where the trees were to be felled was a 'forest' which was disputed by the petitioner. in the ..... forest officer recommended the said application. the deputy conservator of forests, north goa division (tree officer) refused to grant permission to cut the trees vide orders dated 14-11 -96 and 25-11 -96 under section 8 of the goa, daman and diu preservation of trees act, 1984. however, the conservator of forests who is the appellate authority in the matter .....