Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: preservation of trees act 1976 section 7 duties of tree authority Page 4 of about 1,916 results (0.104 seconds)

Sep 20 2013 (HC)

Deepak Balkrishna Vahikar and Another Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ...

Court : Mumbai

..... in a rapid deterioration of green areas in the city. the maharashtra (urban areas) protection and preservation of trees act, 1975 (`the act') provides for the establishment of a tree authority in section 3. the tree authority is to consist of a chairperson who is to be the commissioner of the municipal corporation and ..... the effective implementation of the provisions of the maharashtra (urban areas) protection and preservation of trees act, 1975. in exercise of the powers conferred by the act, the state government has framed the maharashtra (urban areas) protection and preservation of trees rules, 2009. 2. the city of pune covers an area of 243.48 ..... 4. i undertake to comply with each and every condition and direction issued by the tree authority and/or tree officer in its true letter and spirit as also with the provisions of the maharashtra (urban area) protection and preservation of trees act, 1975 and the rules framed thereunder. solemnly affirmed at........ ) this....day of........... ) .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 16 2016 (HC)

The Range Officer and Another Munnar Tea Garden Residency, Represented ...

Court : Kerala

..... whether eucalyptus would fall within the trees referred in the kerala preservation of trees act since it is an exempted tree under the kerala promotion of tree growth in non-forest areas (amendment) act, 2007. the kerala preservation of trees act defines 'trees' which do not include eucalyptus, see section 2(e) of the act. the kerala promotion of tree growth in non-forest areas (amendment) act, 2007 defines trees, under section 2(g) as ..... "tree" means any woody plant, whether fruit bearing .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 21 2000 (HC)

Goa Foundation and ors. Vs. State of Goa Through Secretary and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2001(3)BomCR813

..... the area the forest department found that they had felled trees standing in the said land without permission being taken under the goa trees and preservation act, 1984. a case has been booked against respondent no. 4 for violation of forest (conservation) act, 1980 as well as preservation of trees act, 1984. what is more material is the averment that ..... thought not to come in the purview of the forest (conservation) act, 1980. on account of judgment passed by this court, the position has now altered. felling of trees in the state of goa is also governed by the goa, daman and diu preservation of trees act, 1984. respondent no. 4, it is contended, on injuries made ..... the forest department found that the entire area of 12 hectares is covered by forest, there being on an average 250 trees per hectare and the plot was contiguous to government .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 14 2000 (HC)

State of Karnataka and Others Vs. B. Krishna Bhat and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2001KAR2030; 2001(2)KarLJ1

..... trees near overhead electrical lines, have been either overlooked or ignored. though the forest act, 1963 does not contemplate officers of the forest department supervising the pruning of ..... , keb is blamed for everything. we are criticised for trimming trees, and we are criticised for letting them grow, causing electrical accidents. a set of clippings from the press is enclosed'.but, the said reply has not been considered. further, the provisions of indian electricity act, 1910, preservation of trees act, 1976 and indian telegraph act, 1885 which have a bearing on trimming or cutting of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2005 (HC)

Balakrishnan Nair Vs. Government of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR2005Ker223; 2005(2)KLT485

..... area involved in o.a. was restored to the petitioner on 9.7.1993 after notifying the area under section 5 of the kerala preservation of trees act.5. notification issued under the act was published in the gazette dated 2.7.1991 as per g.o.(p) no. 45/91/f&wld; dated 10.6. ..... of powers under section 5(1) of the act to preserve tree growth which takes in all trees specified in the notification. we ..... to wild growth and not plantations. we are of the view, the expression 'tree growth' as such cannot be read in isolation. for the preservation of tree growth government can issue notification under the preservation of trees act. tree growth would take in the trees specified in the notification. notification has to be issued by the government in exercise .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 22 1999 (HC)

Paul D'Silva and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1999KAR4487; 1999(5)KarLJ355

..... filed an application on 29th january, 1981 in form no. 1 seeking permission to cut the trees standing on the lands referred to above as provided under section 8 of the karnataka preservation of trees act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act'). the said application remained undisposed of for a period of one year from the date of the ..... receipt of the application by the 2nd respondent; and therefore, it is the case of the petitioners that the permission sought by the vendors of the petitioners to cut the trees ..... (4) of section 8 of the act.4. while it is not disputed by the respondents in the statement of objections filed by them that the vendors of the petitioners had made an application on 9th january, 1981 in form no. 1 under rule 4(1) of the karnataka preservation of trees rules, 1977 (hereinafter referred to as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 28 2008 (HC)

Siddeshwara International Vs. State of Karnataka Represented by Its Se ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2009KAR1356; 2009(3)KCCRSN99; 2009(4)AIRKarR367

..... width on steep slops, at times on slope exceeding 45 degree duly clearing the thick forest growth on his patta land in violation of karnataka preservation of trees act 1976, forest conservation act 1980, environmental protection act 1986 and rules there in. it was stated by sri ks sai baba, conservator of forests, chikmagalur circle that this new road was ..... international, extending to about 280 acres consists of thick forest mostly on steep sloppy area. this area of 280 acres adjoins the yemmedoddi tiger preserve (section-4 notified forest under karnataka forest act 1963) on south -western side and surrounded by section-4 proposed area of about 2341 acres on east, north and western sides. the ..... his inspection of the area on 5/8/2006 and against the clear instructions to the mine in charge not to remove any trees and vegetation in the area in violation of various acts stated as above. these new roads are opened up covering the 280 acres of patta land with mine trial pits here and there .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 15 2010 (HC)

James Joseph Vs. Deputy Range Officer

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2010(1)KLT655

..... rs. 80.000/- and timber worth rs. 2,500/- were seized on 22.11.1999 alleging that the trees were cut in violation of section 5 of kerala preservation of trees act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act'). the trees were subsequently released to the petitioner by the magistrate on a petition filed under section 451 of code of criminal ..... procedure, under annexure-l0 order dated 2.3.2006. petitioner would contend that section 5 of the act does not apply to ..... , decree or order of any court, tribunal or other authority, or in any agreement or other arrangement, the government may, with a view to preserving the tree growth in private forests or in the cardamom hills reserve or in any other areas cultivated with cardamom, by notification in the gazette, direct that no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 15 1988 (HC)

Jose Chake Manakattu Vs. the Tree Officer and Deputy Conservator of Fo ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1989Kant189; 1988(1)KarLJ380

..... , the following question of law arises for consideration :whether a person who has cut the trees standing on his own land, in contravention of the provisions of the karnataka preservation of trees act 1976 ('the act' for short), is liable to pay the value of the trees in adition to the compounding fees payable under cl. (a) of s. 21(l) ..... of the act?2. this petition has come up for preliminary hearing after notice to the respondents. ..... or occupied by the person concerned. the law is enacted for the purpose of preservation of trees whether they stand on the government land or private land. according to the provisions of the act, no tree can be cut with out permission. therefore, once a tree is cut without permission whether it is situate on a government land or a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 15 2002 (HC)

Narayan and ors. Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Uttara Kannada, Karwar and a ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2002Kant273; 2002(4)KarLJ382

..... lands where there is certain tree growth and who have applied to the second respondent-tree officer for permission to cut and remove those trees under section 8 of the karnataka preservation of trees act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the 'act' for short). the applications filed by the petitioners to the tree officer are produced as an ..... act and particularly for coming in the way of the tree officer passing orders on the applications filed before him. 3. on a perusal of the circulars, it is found that the circulars have been issued by the first respondent-deputy commissioner in his capacity as the deputy commissioner of the district and for the purpose of taking suitable steps to preserve ..... and protect the tree growth on government lands and for proper realization of the value of trees which were standing on granted lands. it is in this context, these circulars havebeen issued. it .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //