Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: preservation of trees act 1976 section 7 duties of tree authority Court: chennai Page 6 of about 96 results (0.055 seconds)

Krishnamoorthy Vs. Sivakumar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2009)5MLJ1255

..... possessed by a candidate, his or her spouse and dependent relations;(iii) facts giving insight into the candidate's competence, capacity and suitability for acting as an elected member, including details of the educational qualifications;(iv) information considered necessary by the election commission for judging the capacity and capability ..... i) the involvement in criminal cases (ii) the assets and liabilities and (iii) the educational qualifications of the candidates, are not prescribed by acts of parliament or legislatures but by statutory orders or notifications issued by eci or state election commissions. however this prescription has received the seal of ..... the areas unoccupied by legislation. the qualifications and disqualifications of candidates contesting for elections are prescribed statutorily, (i) by the representation of the people act in respect of elections to state legislatures and the parliament and (ii) by the state legislatures in respect of elections to local bodies. the .....

Azhinjilan Vs. Visalakshi

Court : Chennai

..... title of the true owner, can be said to have started only when the defendant derived knowledge that his possession over the suit land had been alleged to be an act of encroachment on the plaintiff's survey number. in konda lakshmana bapuji v. government of a.p and others reported in air 200.sc 1012.the honourable apex court, considering ..... and the burden to prove that the person in possession is not the true owner is heavy on the person who asserts the same under section 110 of the evidence act? 9. this court heard the arguments advanced by ms.mala, on behalf of the appellant/plaintiff and by mr.n.suresh on behalf of the respondent/defendant. the judgments of .....

Trustpuram Residents' Association Vs. the Coporation of Madras

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1991Mad178

..... is a play field within the meaning of the tamil nadu parks, play-fields and open spaces (preservation and regulation) act (xxvi of 1959) (hereinafter referred to as the act) and there is a clear prohibition under section 6 of the act preventing the land being put to use for anypurpose other than the purpose for which it was ..... found in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petitioner :'trustpuram colony (major) at kodambakkam was developed under a scheme formulated under the city improvement trust act in the year 1956-57. under the said scheme apart from providing for residential building, a playground was also provided. the said playground is at present situate ..... corporation has displayed a sign board 'corportion playground in the land in question will be sufficient to prove that it is a playfield within the meaning of the act. according to learned counsel, in the face of such express averments, it is for the respondent to file a counter-affidavit denying the same and to establish .....

D.Ganesan Vs. State of Tamil Nadu.

Court : Chennai

..... who have passed b.ed., from the institutions recognised by the national council for teacher education. the supreme court found that even prior to the enactment of the ncte act, degrees such as b.ed., were being awarded by the universities recognised by the university grants commission. therefore, it was held in the said decision that the degrees ..... of a private law college, despite the fact that he did not have the qualification in law. the qualifications possessed by him satisfied the prescription contained in the university act, 1973. but the bar council of india withdrew the recognition granted to the college on the ground that the principal did not have a qualification in law. when ..... exercise of the powers conferred by sections 7 (1) (h) and (i), 24(1)(c)(iii) and (iii-a), 49(1)(af)(ag) and (d) of the advocates act, 1961. (iii) para 16 of schedule iii of legal education rules, 2008 prescribes that there shall be a principal for each constituent or affiliated centre of legal education of a .....

G. Sundarrajan Vs. the Union of India Rep. by the Secretary to Governm ...

Court : Chennai

..... according to environmental law and policy in india by shyam divan and armin rosencranz, many native and indigenous people are fully aware of what constitutes preservation and conservation of biodiversity. many native and indigenous people have many a times opposed government policies that permit exploitation on traditional lands because such exploitation threatens ..... held that the enactment of a law, but tolerating its infringement is worst than not enacting the law at all in the context of air act, water act and environment (protection) act, 1986. the observation made by the supreme court, relied upon by the learned counsel, is as follows: "41. with rapid industrialisation taking ..... possible time. the unit has training programmes. hence complied. all the vacant land within the project zone should be afforested with a tree density of 1000 per acre with trees having thick canopy cover. the unit has requested to exempt the conditions as 10%. however the unit shall be imposed with a condition .....

M.Arumugam Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

..... of the body, but rests on the society at large, whose interests alone the board represents and nothing more. the autonomous functioning and democratic control are still preserved and the amendment does not, in any manner, dilute these principles which are the hallmarks of the cooperative society.107. the petitioners, however, strongly contended that ..... a regulatory provision, well within the framework of the concept adumbrated in the decision reported in air 197.sc 96.(damyanti naranga v. union of india), preserving the rights of the existing members to admit or reject an application for membership. thus, even with the ultimate authority of the registered society resting on the ..... " 144. we have already seen in the preceding paragraphs that the amending act does not, in any manner, interfere with the discretion of the society to admit new members. thus, with the right of the society to admit new members in fact preserved, we do not find any unreasonableness in the provision to strike it down .....

The General Manager, Union of India, Chennai and Others Vs. The Regist ...

Court : Chennai

..... decision of the respondents also runs counter to the provisions under section 47 of the persons with disabilities (equal opportunities, protection of rights and full participation) act, 1995, which reads as follows:- "47. non-discrimination in government employment.- (1) no establishment shall dispense with, or reduce in rank., an employee ..... a particular purpose; specially. in p.ramanatha aiyers law lexicon (2nd edition), the word "ad hoc" is defined as for a particular purpose, made, established, acting or concerned with a particular and or purpose. in chamber's dictionary, "ad hoc" means, "for special purpose". 34. the expression "fortuitous" in strouds judicial ..... safety, as also interest of the employee concerned, co-employees and administration, the respondent cannot, by relying upon section 47(2) of the act, avoid subjecting himself to medical examination for ascertainment of b1 medical category fitness. 18. prescription of a minimum medical standard for promotion should be considered .....

Chellasivalingam Nadar Vs. Aruldas and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1975)1MLJ85

..... by me, there is no need to discuss the decision in umraon singh v. chakauri singh : air1958pat302 , which incidentally arose under section 63 of the transfer of property act, which is not relevant here. 10. the next point is one of limitation. unless the position of mortgagor and mortgagee continued, the process of limitation cannot be stopped. ..... i am therefore unable to hold that section 90 of the indian trusts act has any application to the facts.8. section 72 (b) of the transfer of property act is an enabling provision enabling a mortgagee to spend such money as is necessary for the preservation of the mortgaged property from destruction, forfeiture or sale. in such a ..... one narayana perumal nadar on 29th february, 1934 with regard to the suit property under exhibit a-l. this property was sold in auction under the revenue recovery act and narayana perumal purchased the entire property of 1 acre and 87 cents in the revenue sale. a certificate under exhibit b-1, dated 25th november, 1938 .....

The Secretary of State for India-in-council Represented by the Collect ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1924Mad913

..... aiyangar, j., but on the ground that the plaintiff had been drawing off the same quantity of water from time immemorial but he refused to consider the effect of act iii of 1905. i am therefore of opinion that the patta of the plaintiff does not include this undemarcated poramboke stream.9. the second contention is that, if ..... rivers and streami.' again, in secretary of state v. ambalavana pandara sannadhi : air1918mad516 abdur rahim, j. held that 'in order to justify the imposition of cess under this act, it must be made out that the, irrigation la caused by water supplied or obtained from a stream or river belonging to the government,' and he did not understand the ..... the lands in permanently settled estates.' in kandukuri mahalakshmamma, garu v. secretary of state (1910) 34 mad. 295 miller and munro, jj., held that under section 2 of act iii of 1905, where the channel or river, which is the flawing body of water, is not shown to belong to a private person, it belongs to government although .....

The Secretary of State for India in Council Represented by the Collect ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 83Ind.Cas.1009; (1924)47MLJ503

..... full bench as against the observations in the secretary of slate for india v. ambalavana pandara sannadhi : air1918mad516 that a special presumption is raised in favour of government by madras act iii of 1905. (see per oldiield, j. at page 398 and per bakewell, j. at page 403).11. the fourth contention of the plaintiff is that he has ..... aiyangar, j., but on the ground that the plaintiff had been drawing off the same quantity of water from time immemorial but he refused to consider the effect of act 111 of 1905. i am therefore of opinion that the patta of the plaintiff does not include this un-demarcated poramboke stream.9. the second contention is that, ..... again, in the secretary of state for india v. ambalavana pandara sannadhi : air1918mad516 . abdur rahim, j. held that ' in order to justify the imposition of cess under this act, it must be made out that the irrigation is caused by water supplied or obtained from a stream or river belonging to the government,' and he did not understand the .....