Presentative - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: presentative Court: income tax appellate tribunal itat hyderabad Year: 1989 Page 1 of about 17 results (0.036 seconds)Pritam H. Dadlani Vs. Income-tax Officer
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
Decided on : Jan-16-1989
Reported in : (1989)29ITD440(Hyd.)
..... mir osman ah khan s case supra was not applicable to the facts of the present case as therein the apex court was interpreting the words belonging to the assessee appearing .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTinstrumentation Engineers (P.) Vs. Income-tax Officer
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
Decided on : May-23-1989
Reported in : (1990)32ITD406(Hyd.)
..... as the tribunal and therefore no order of the income tax officer as such was presently existing which could be revised by the commissioner under section 263 of the income tax .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTincome-tax Officer Vs. Smt. Jagrani Bai
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
Decided on : Dec-29-1989
Reported in : (1990)34ITD54(Hyd.)
..... by name nirmala and since then he is living separately with his new wife at present he is having 3 children who were born to nirmala the second wife 3 our .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. K. Narasamma Vs. Income-tax Officer
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
Decided on : Feb-20-1989
Reported in : (1990)32ITD494(Hyd.)
..... rs 3 50 000 which was also confirmed by the first appellate authority hence the present appeal 6 as is evident from the sale deed registered on 3rd of january 1973 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSyed Mohammed Iqbal and Sons Vs. Income-tax Officer
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
Decided on : Feb-28-1989
Reported in : (1989)31ITD385(Hyd.)
..... to register the instrument of partnership specifying the individual shares as shown in the instrument presented to him and not to register another instrument after eliminating such portion thereof as may .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTinspecting Assistant Vs. Modern Electronics
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
Decided on : May-23-1989
Reported in : (1989)31ITD299(Hyd.)
..... return in this case on the other hand the learned d r contended that the present explanation is merely invented only at the second appeal stage and it was never raised .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTH. Sudershan and Co. Vs. Income-tax Officer.
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
Decided on : Aug-04-1989
Reported in : (1990)33ITD35(Hyd.)
..... 1 and 2 of section 186 in any event the learned counsel contended that the present is a case where the ito did not apply the provision of section 186 2 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTincome-tax Officer Vs. Vinayaka Agencies
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
Decided on : Aug-08-1989
Reported in : (1989)31ITD192(Hyd.)
..... the profits shall be allocated in the name of lord venkateswara which amount can be presented to the tirupathi devasthanam that under the provisions of partnership act the deed was a ..... by valid representative as charity is not juristic personality whereas in the facts of the present case lord venkateswara who is a juristic person and who can be represented validly only .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNageswara Rice Working Co. Vs. Income-tax Officer.
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
Decided on : Feb-24-1989
Reported in : (1989)30ITD143(Hyd.)
..... provisions of these enactments and counteract tax avoidance and tax evasion we consider that the present amendment to section 40 b of the act through explanations 2 and 3 above referred ..... judicial opinion in this matter among the various high courts in the country and the present amendment to section 40 b through explanations 2 and 3 following the decisions of some .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTP. Dayakar Vs. Income-tax Officer
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
Decided on : Mar-23-1989
Reported in : (1995)53ITD25(Hyd.)
..... been spent wholly exclusively and necessarily in the performance of duties 11 hence in the present case deductions are permissible of 40 of the incentive bonus which came to rs 1 ..... 1 the points for consideration in the present appeals relating to the assessment years 1981 82 and 1982 83 which emanate out of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT