Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pondicherry university act 1985 section 9 visitor Sorted by: recent Year: 1961 Page 3 of about 24 results (0.495 seconds)

Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Income-tax Officer ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : [1963]47ITR101(AP)

..... view that the word 'individual' is wide enough to include a group of persons forming a unit and includes a corporation created by a statute, e.g., a university or a bar council or the trustee of a baronetcy trust, has been accepted by some of the high courts and the supreme court, while the other view that ..... act.' but in construing the words 'any individual' or 'such individual' in section 16(3) of the act, it was held that the meaning was restricted in their connection as applicable ..... sodra devi, while considering the terms 'any individual' and 'such individual' occurring in section 16(3) of the indian income-tax act, confirmed this view observing at page 620 that 'the word individual includes a corporation created by a statute, e.g., a university or a bar council, or the trustee of a baronetcy trust incorporated by a baronetcy .....

Monroe Vs. Pape

Court : US Supreme Court

..... maryland, 359 u.s. page 365 u. s. 210 360, 359 u. s. 365 . [ footnote 3/12 ] searches of the dwelling house were the special object of this universal condemnation of official intrusion. [ footnote 3/13 ] night-time search was the evil in its most obnoxious form. [ footnote 3/14 ] few reported cases have presented all of the ..... /9 ] i do not think that this court's decision in collins v. hardyman, 341 u. s. 651 , can properly be viewed as determining the scope of the provision of 1985 which refers to conspiring "for the purpose of preventing . . . the constituted authorities of any state . . . from giving . . . the equal protection of the laws. . . ." not only did ..... equal protection of his own accord. [ footnote 2/7 ] we have not passed upon the question whether 42 u.s.c. 1985, [ footnote 2/8 ] which was passed as the second section of the act that included 1983, was intended to reach only the ku klux klan or other substantially organized group activity, as distinguished from what its .....

Dr. Akshaibar Lal and ors. Vs. the Vice-chancellor, Banaras Hindu Univ ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1961SC619; [1961]3SCR386

..... is anything expressly stated by law or clearly implied which would exclude powers under the agreements and the ordinances, when action has been taken under the statutes. the university act expressly makes the ordinances subject to the statutes, and in case of any clash between them, the ordinances must be made to stand down. further, statute no. ..... had arisen which required intervention immediately. the president of india, in his capacity as visitor and in exercise of the powers conferred by s. 5(2) of the banaras hindu university act, 1915, appointed a committee of enquiry (known as the mudaliar committee) consisting of : dr. a. l. mudaliar (president) 2. mr. m. c. mahajan 3. dr. p. ..... under the agreement or ordinance no. 6 was incompetent. the action of the executive council was characterised as mala fide and a fraud upon the university act and statute no. 30. the high court did not accept any of these contentions. before us, the same points have been urged again, and in reply, the .....

Dharamvir Dhir Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax, Bihar and Orissa

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1961SC668; [1961]42ITR7(SC); [1961]3SCR359

..... court relied upon the cases hereinafter mentioned but in our opinion they do not apply to the facts and circumstances of this case. this first case referred to is pondicherry railway company v. commissioner of income-tax, madras [ ]. in that case the assessee company, incorporated in the united kingdom, obtained a concession of constructing a ..... the indian radio and cable communications company ltd. v. the commissioner of income-tax, bombay : [1937]5itr270(bom) , it was observed that it was not universally true to say that a payment the making of which is conditional on profits being earned cannot properly be described as an expenditure incurred for the purpose of earning such ..... assessee are brought against two judgments and orders of the high court of judicature at patna in income-tax references under s. 66(2) of the income tax act - section 66(2)answering the question in the negative and against the assessees. the questions were : (1) 'whether on the facts and circumstances of this case .....