Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pondicherry university act 1985 section 9 visitor Sorted by: recent Court: us supreme court Year: 2007 Page 4 of about 42 results (0.252 seconds)

United Haulers Assn., Inc. Vs. Oneida-herkimer Solid Waste Management ...

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the responsibility of protecting the health, safety, and welfare of its citizens. see metropolitan life ins. co. v. massachusetts , 471 u. s. 724 , 756 (1985) ( the states traditionally have had great latitude under their police powers to legislate as to the protection of the lives, limbs, health, comfort, and quiet of all ..... v. wunnicke , 467 u. s. 82 , 93 (1984) (emphasis added). respondents are doing exactly what the market-participant doctrine says they cannot: while acting as market participants by operating a fee-for-service business enterprise in an area in which there is an established interstate market, respondents are also regulating that market in ..... should be exempt from the usual dormant commerce clause standards. proper analysis under the dormant commerce clause involves more than an inquiry into whether the challenged act is in some sense directed toward legitimate goals unrelated to protectionism ; equally important are the means by which those goals are realized. if the .....

Shailendra Dania and ors. Vs. S.P. Dubey and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2007(5)SC487; 2007(5)SCALE781; (2007)5SCC535; 2007AIRSCW3553

..... the 50% promotion quota reserved for the person possessing degree in electrical engineering from a recognized university or an equivalent with three years' regular service in the grade of junior engineers in the electricity department, government of pondicherry, three years' experience as junior engineer in the grade is to be counted from the ..... came up for consideration. d. stephen joseph (supra) provides for promotion to 50% quota from junior engineers possessing degree in electrical engineering from a recognized university with three years' regular service in the grade of junior engineers. on the plain language of the rule, this court has held that the requirement of ..... grade of assistant engineer.3. the appellants were graduates with engineering degree and joined the department as junior engineers as direct recruits. on 7.6.1985 and 24.6.1985, some diploma-holder junior engineers were promoted on ad hoc basis as assistant engineers.first phase of litigation4. in the year 1984, the junior .....

Watters Vs. Wachovia Bank, N. A.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... agency regulation can have a preemptive effect should it conflict with state law. see hillsborough county v. automated medical laboratories, inc. , 471 u. s. 707 , 713 (1985) ( we have held repeatedly that state laws can be pre-empted by federal regulations as well as by federal statutes ); see also fidelity fed. sav. & loan assn ..... for the sixth circuit [april 17, 2007] justice ginsburg delivered the opinion of the court. business activities of national banks are controlled by the national bank act (nba or act), 12 u. s. c. 1 et seq ., and regulations promulgated thereunder by the office of the comptroller of the currency (occ). see 24, 93a ..... g)(3)(a); 12 cfr 5.34(e)(3) (2006). see also clarke v. securities industry assn. , 479 u. s. 388 (1987) (national banks, acting through operating subsidiaries, have power to offer discount brokerage services).[ footnote 11 ] security against significant interference by state regulators is a characteristic condition of the business of banking conducted .....

Massachusetts Vs. Epa

Court : US Supreme Court

..... text or precedent, rejects all of epa s stated policy judgments as not amount[ing] to a reasoned justification, ante , at 31, effectively narrowing the universe of potential reasonable bases to a single one: judgment can be delayed only if the administrator concludes that the scientific uncertainty is [too] profound. ibid . ..... that discretion is at its height when the agency decides not to bring an enforcement action. therefore, in heckler v. chaney , 470 u. s. 821 (1985), we held that an agency s refusal to initiate enforcement proceedings is not ordinarily subject to judicial review. some debate remains, however, as to the rigor with ..... fossil fuels could lead to global warming, they did understand that without regulatory flexibility, changing circumstances and scientific developments would soon render the clean air act obsolete. the broad language of 202(a)(1) reflects an intentional effort to confer the flexibility necessary to forestall such obsolescence. see pennsylvania dept. of .....

Vice Chancellor, M.D. University, Rohtak Vs. Jahan Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2007(113)FLR428]; 2007(4)SCALE226; 2007AIRSCW2111; 2007(5)SCC77

..... factual backdrop, the legal questions raised before us are required to be considered. the university is a creature of statute. it was created under the maharishi dayanand university act, 1975 (for short, 'the act'). the said act provides for the regulations making power. the university framed leave regulation. regulation 26(i)(c) deals with extra-ordinary leave, which reads ..... on expiry of the said period of two years, he joined the university again in august 1985. he thereafter prayed for grant of increments in the pay scale during the period he was on extra-ordinary leave. the university referred the matter to the university grants commission, which in terms of its letter dated 10.12.1987 ..... the respondent that the vice- chancellor had been pleased to count his extra-ordinary leave period when he had worked with the university of zambia from 30.11.1983 to 14.08.1985 towards annual increment. it is, however, stated that the said resolution of the executive council and/or the said letter was .....

Ashok Kumar Sonkar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2007(3)AWC2846(SC); JT2007(6)SC127; 2007(3)SCALE517; (2007)4SCC54; 2007(3)SLJ420(SC)

..... of india in his capacity as the visitor of the university under section 5(7) of the banaras hindu university act, 1915. the visitor, after considering the reply of the university, pleased to annul the appointment of dr. ashok kumar sonkar as lecturer in tridosh vigyan ims, banaras hindu university with immediate effect. this issue on the basis of ..... is as under:kindly refer to your letter no.aa/vi-sc/1460 dated the 15 july, 2000 forwarding therewith 1460 a reply of the university to the show cause notice issued in exercise of ..... 10.2000, intimating the registrar of the university that the president of india in his capacity as the visitor of the university had annulled the appointment of the appellant in exercise of the power conferred upon him under section 5(7) of the banaras hindu university act, 1915 (for short, 'the act'), the relevant portion of the said letter .....

Mahim Patram Private Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2007(4)SC50; 2007(3)SCALE584; (2007)3SCC668; 2007[7]STR110; [2007]7STT136

..... j.1. leave granted.2. appellant herein is engaged, inter alia, in the printing of questions papers for examination boards, competitive examination boards, recruitment boards and various universities and boards situate outside the state of uttar pradesh. it carries on a highly specialized and secretive work. the activities of the appellant admittedly amounts to a works ..... of the material produced by the contractor.6. in deference to the aforementioned judgment of this court, the parliament amended section 2(g) of the 1956 act by finance act, 2002. no rule, however, has till date been framed in regard to the manner in which sales price of such transfer is to be calculated. the ..... for computing the tax liability is considered to be one of the components of tax govind saran ganga saran v. commissioner of sales tax and ors. [ : [1985]155itr144(sc) ]. but then measure or value to which rate would be applied is one thing, but how the turnover would be determined is another. computation provisions .....

Nair Service Society Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2007SC2891; JT2007(6)SC103; 2007(2)KLT77(SC); 2007(4)SCALE106; (2007)4SCC1; 2007(6)AIRKarR101; 2007AIRSCW5276

..... irish constitution (1937) and the west german constitution (1949) use the expression 'equal before law' alone. both these expressions are used together in the universal declaration of human rights, 1948, article 7 whereof says 'all are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the ..... provided for equality of opportunity in matters of public employment. buttressing these fundamental rights, article 309 provides that subject to the provisions of the constitution, acts of the legislature may regulate the recruitment and conditions of service of persons appointed to public services and posts in connection with the affairs of the ..... in : air2000sc498 (hereinafter referred to as 'indra sawhney-ii'), this court, while holding the provisions of sections 3, 4 and 6 of the state act to be unconstitutional, upon consideration of the objections to the report of the joseph committee, accepted the same in toto, subject to certain additions of communities .....

P.V. George and ors. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2007SC1034; 2007(2)ALD51(SC); [2007(113)FLR21]; JT2007(2)SC394; 2007(1)KLT833(SC); (2007)2LLJ522SC; 2007(2)SCALE262; (2007)3SCC557; [2007]3SCL262(SC)

..... interpretation placed on the provisions of law by the division bench in bhakre's case was erroneous, it will have to be held that the appointments made by the university on march 30, 1985 pursuant to the law laid down in bhakre's case were not according to law. hence, the termination of the services of the appellants were in compliance with ..... a 'novel one'. with some perspicacity lord hope of craighead foresaw at p. 36 that 'the issue of retrospectivity is likely to assume an added importance when the human rights act 1998 is brought into force'. lord hobhouse at p.48 f would have none of it. the latest in this line of authority seems to be in re spectrum plus ..... ors. : (1991)illj574sc , this court held:the second contention need not detain us long. it is based primarily on the provisions of section 57(5) of the act. the contention is that since the provisions of that section give power to the chancellor to terminate the services of a teacher only if he is satisfied that the appointment ' .....

Osborn Vs. Haley

Court : US Supreme Court

..... own appellate-review bar. see n. 1, supra . absent a clear statutory command to the contrary, we assume that congress is aware of the universality of th[e] practice of denying appellate review of remand orders when congress creates a new ground for removal. things remembered , 516 u. s., at ..... asserts an immunity defense, i.e. , an entitlement not to stand trial under certain circumstances, mitchell v. forsyth , 472 u. s. 511 , 525 (1985) (emphasis added), special immunity-related procedures focus, not upon factfinding, but upon the proper legal characterization of the facts as given. where the parties immunity-related ..... undertakes a threshold inquiry; typically the court determines whether complete diversity exists or whether the complaint raises a federal question. in attorney general certified westfall act cases, however, no threshold determination is called for; the attorney general s certificate forecloses any jurisdictional inquiry. by declaring the attorney general s certification .....