Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pondicherry university act 1985 section 9 visitor Sorted by: recent Court: rajasthan Page 5 of about 369 results (0.224 seconds)

Nov 20 2006 (HC)

Bansi Lal Jakhar (Dr.) Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2007(2)Raj1067

..... post of head master. he obtained three years bachelor's degree in arts in the year 1982 thereafter he also obtained the degree of b.ed, in the year 1985 both from rajasthan university, jaipur and then he obtained the degree of m.a. in political science in the year 1984 and obtained ph.d in the year 1992.3. the written ..... seeking relaxation in the outer age limit for appointment on the post of head master, secondary school. he was initially appointed as teacher grade-iii vide order dated 14th sept., 1985. later however he accepted the appointment as primary teacher in kandriya vidhayalaya, uttarlai, barmer on 10.12.1986 where he was promoted as teacher grade-h (tgt) and worked upto .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 11 2006 (HC)

Mahaveer Prasad Saroj Vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation T ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2006(4)Raj3307

..... the learned lower court dismissed the suit of the plaintiff for declaration.3. the plaintiff filed a suit for declaration to declare the order dated 21st of august, 1985 as illegal and void, whereby the service of the plaintiff was terminated from the post of conductor. it was pleaded that the plaintiff was selected by the selection ..... (supra) are reproduced here as under:31. for the foregoing reasons, we hold that the respondent ought to have approached the remedies provided under the industrial disputes act. he has miserably failed to do so but approached the civil court, which on the facts and circumstances of the case has no jurisdiction to entertain and try ..... court also held that if the court has no jurisdiction, the jurisdiction cannot be conferred by any order of the court. this court also held that where an act creates an obligation and enforces the performance in a specified manner, the performance cannot be enforced in any other manner. the respondent in that case has failed to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 05 2006 (HC)

Arvind Kumar Joshi Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2006(4)Raj3149

..... court were dealing with a case where issue pertained to the reservation of identified teaching posts in the faculties and colleges of various universities in terms of section 33 of the act of 1995. the extracts of the affidavit of the chief commissioner for persons with disabilities reproduced in the said order show that the ..... 5% relaxation in cut of marks for the blind candidates appearing in the national entrance test (net) for junior research fellowship and lecturership was provided by the university grant commission.15. in shiv kumar singh v. state of rajasthan and ors. (supra), the division bench of this court was dealing with a case wherein ..... disability of blindness were claiming reservation on the post of lecturer in college education. the writ petition for challenging terms of the advertisement was tiled in the year 1985 because rule 3 of the rajasthan employment of physically handicapped rules, 1976 (for short 'the rules of 1976') debarred appointment of the blind on the post .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 11 2006 (HC)

R.S.R.T.C. and ors. Vs. Bhanwar Lal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2007(1)Raj728

..... driver, the order dated 2.12.1983 of the appellate authority dismissing his appeal against the order dated 5.3.1982, and the order dated 3.7.1985 of the reviewing authority, as illegal, unconstitutional and void, and to decree his suit for reinstatement with all consequential benefits.4. defendant-appellants filed their written statement ..... entertain, try and decide the civil suit and the only remedy available to the plaintiff-respondent is by way of reference under the provisions of the industrial disputes act, 1947. the point is settled that the defendant corporation is an industry and plaintiff is workman. the hon'ble supreme court also directed that the plaintiff, ..... supra) are reproduced here as under:31. for the foregoing reasons, we hold that the respondent ought to have approached the remedies provided under the industrial disputes act. he has miserably failed to do so but approached the civil court, which on the facts and circumstances of the case has no jurisdiction to entertain and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 03 2006 (HC)

Prakash Chaturvedi and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2006(3)Raj2424; 2006(4)WLC515

..... of instant writ petition under the label of 'public interest litigation' have challenged the validity of rajasthan private universities act. 2005, hereinafter referred to as 'the rajasthan act'. it is submitted that the act of 2005 is liable to be quashed in view of the judgment of the hon'ble supreme court rendered ..... under section 28 offor education and training; the indira gandhi national open unive-4. to carry out teaching and research rsity act, 1985 (central act no.50 ofand offer continuing education pro- 1985);grammes; (d) 'distance education' means5. to create centres of excellence for education imported by combination ofresearch and development and for ..... institutions of education/higher education throughout the country. it is averred that the said applicant under the individual act of state legislature of u.p. known as 'amity university act, uttar-pradesh' established the university with its main campus at gautam budh nagar and another campus at lucknow. both the campuses have more .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 08 2006 (HC)

Rakesh Soni and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2006(4)Raj2778; 2006(3)WLC520

..... number of rules in exercise of powers conferred by section 25 of the ugc act and the commission has also made regulations in exercise of power conferred by section 26 of the ugc act and to mention a few, the ugc inspection of ' universities rules, 1960, the ugc regulations, 1985 regarding the minimum standards of instructions for the grant of the first degree, ugc ..... regulations, 1991 regarding minimum qualifications of appointment of teachers in universities and colleges, etc. ugc with the approval of the central government .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 24 2006 (HC)

L.Rs. of Magna Vs. Amar Chand and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2007(3)Raj2200

..... by which the trial court decreed the suit of the plaintiffs for specific performance of the contract and against the appellate judgment and decree dated 11.11.1985 in civil first appeal no. 46/1980 by which the appellate court partly allowed the appeal and though upheld the decree for specific performance of the contract ..... never the case of the defendant that earlier agreement was cancelled or new contract was entered into between the parties. proviso to section 49 of the registration act recognized unregistered sale-deed as agreement to sell, therefore, the suit for specific performance of contract on the basis of unregistered sale-deed is also maintainable. since ..... performed his part of the contract. it was not the condition or obligation upon the plaintiffs to present the document for registration. section 32 of the registration act, 1908 provides that the document for registration except as provided under section 31, 88 and 89 shall be presented by the person executing document or his .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 2006 (HC)

R.L. JaIn and ors. Vs. Dr. Mahendra Pratap Singh and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2006(3)Raj1765

..... nos. 2 to 5 are also liable to pay the rent and, therefore, decreed the suit against all the defendants jointly and severally by judgment and decree dated 14.12.1985.6. the present appellant defendants no. 2 to 5 preferred this appeal to avoid their share in the decretal amount of rs. 4100/-. the appeal was admitted on 22.1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 03 2006 (HC)

State of Rajasthan Vs. Sarita Choudhary

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2006(3)Raj2507

..... view our order dt. 3.4.2002 and subsequent orders regulating the students' election and functioning of the students' union and the act of the vice chancellor, jnv university, jodhpur sanctioning the amount in favour of the students circumventing the orders of this court, we direct the state government and the chancellor ..... essay competition of a debate or any other similar activities;(c) organising the seminar, conference, workshop;(d) social service;(e) shram dan within the university campus;(f) programme showing sensitiveness towards the protection of environment or human rights;(g) cultural performance;(xv) the students union will prepare and present the ..... ensure growth of the responsible citizenry for development of the country. however, till such statutory rules are framed, we direct as follows:(i) the universities or the state or the constituent colleges shall constitute an editorial board of independent teachers and students and publish quarterly news letter or bulletin with the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 01 2006 (HC)

Vishwa Kumar Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2006CriLJ2096; I(2006)DMC574; RLW2006(2)Raj1123; 2006(2)WLC268

..... trial.(2) the test to determine a prima facie case would naturally depend upon the facts of each case and it is difficult to lay down a rule of universal application. by and large however if two views are equally possible and the judge is satisfied that the evidence produced before him while giving rise to some suspicion ..... on the face of the record, there is some evidence about the commission of the offence. in fact according to the case of mahesh chand v. state of rajasthan 1985 cr. l.j. 301 (raj.), the full bench of this court has held that the cognizance of an offence can be taken even if the offenders are unknown. hence ..... a 'grave suspicion' should connect the accused to the alleged crime.17. thus, there are differences between 'taking of cognizance and 'framing of charge'. of course, both the acts require the application of judicious mind. however, the former is done without hearing both the parties. cognizance is taken without the accused being heard. the latter is done after hearing .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //