Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pondicherry university act 1985 section 4 objects Page 9 of about 86,698 results (0.288 seconds)

Sep 11 2002 (HC)

Anurag Verma Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR2002All370

..... has held as under at page 1017 :--'17. ........... .............. ...............the only point urged before the division bench was on the basis of a provision in the university act as to eligibility and qualification of candidates for admission to medical colleges. there is however, no substance in the contention raised in this behalf, for the ..... 1983; k.v. swaminathan v. e.v. padmanabhan, 1996 (5) jt 205 : (air 1996 sc 3344); state of haryana v. chandvir and 1985 (3) scc 398 : (air 1985 sc 1416); union of india v. tulsi ram patel.23. section 28(5) as extracted above provides that admission to medical and engineering colleges shall, subject ..... in other universities if left for open competition the delhi students cannot be made martyrs of the constitution.50. even so, 'reservation' must be administered in moderation, if it is to be constitutional. some central technical institutions like the all india institute of medical sciences, delhi and chandigarh and the pondicherry medical college .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 03 2006 (TRI)

Anglo French Textiles Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in : (2006)(108)ECC585

..... ) ltd. v. commissioner 2004 (178) elt 901 (tri.-bang.). ld. counsel also pleaded financial hardships. he produced copies of the annual report 2004-2005 of the pondicherry textile corporation ltd. the profit & loss account given in this report for the year ended 31st march 2005 indicates a loss of rs. 222.5 crores. ld. sdr ..... to be established.3. nevertheless, having found substance in the plea of revenue-neutrality and having regard to the fact that the appellant-unit is a govt. of pondicherry undertaking, we are inclined to adopt an extremely lenient approach. accordingly, the appellant is directed to predeposit only rs. 5,00,000/- (rupees five lakhs only) ..... issued a show-cause notice for recovery of differential duty of over rs. 27 lakhs under section 11a with interest under section 11ab of the central excise act from the appellants, alleging that the unprocessed cotton fabrics cleared by them to their sister units during march 2002 to february 2003 had undergone processes amounting to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 24 1962 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay Vs. Poona Electric Supply Co. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1963]49ITR913(Bom)

..... v. commissioners of inland revenue, sowrey (surveyor of taxes) v. harbour mooring commissioners of king's lynn, bharat insurance co. ltd. v. commissioner of income-tax and pondicherry railway co. ltd. v. commissioner income-tax. 6. mr. kolah, on the other hand, contends that clause i of the sixth schedule enjoins a duty on the ..... accounting years being calendar year 1952 and calendar year 1953. the assessee claimed these amounts as permissible allowance under section 10(2) (xv) of the income-tax act. it appears that in the earlier years the practice of the department had been that the amounts credited to the 'consumers benefit reserve account' were not allowed as ..... been accepted by their lordships of the privy council in a later case as one of universal application. in indian radio and cable communications company ltd. v. commissioner of income-tax, it has been observed : '.... it is not universally true to say that a payment the making of which is conditional on profits being earned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 2014 (HC)

Dr.R.Sakthivel Vs. 1)The Syndicate, Rep by Its

Court : Chennai

..... opportunity to engage state of art technology and scientific tools. in the year, 2010, he had applied for the post of teacher in geology department of pondicherry university and his candidature was considered. however he was not selected in the competitive process.22. the 3rd respondent has further submitted that he applied for the post ..... w.p.no.572 of 2013, has filed a counter affidavit, stating that he belong to schedule caste community. he studied master?.s degree in geology during 1985 - 87 and passed in first class. thereafter, he studied m.phil degree in geology in the year 1998 and passed in first class. in the year ..... in educational institutions including private educational institutions and of appointments or posts in the services under the state within the reservation for the scheduled castes)act, 2009 (tamil nadu act 4 of 2009), the governor of tamil nadu hereby makes the following amendment to the tamil nadu arunthathiyars (special reservation of seats in educational .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 19 1967 (HC)

Maharashtra State Electricity Board, Engineer's Association, Nagpur, t ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1968Bom65; (1967)69BOMLR674; 1967MhLJ783

..... in our opinion the contentions raised on behalf of the respondents are not well founded. in the punjab case, the question was whether the punjab university constituted under the universities act, was a 'state' within the meaning of article 12 of the constitution. the division bench apparently followed the reasoning in the madras case ..... whether an authority would be 'other authority' within the meaning of article 12 of the constitution.(10) in k.s. ramamurthy v. chief court missioner, pondicherry, : [1964]1scr656 . their lordships observed as follows in paragraph 11:-'article 12 gives an inclusive definition of the words the state and with in ..... discharges any of the sovereign function of the state. the respondents have invited our attention to the following decisions in support of their contention: krishan gopal v. punjab university , university of madras v. shanthabai, : air1954mad67 , surendra kumar, v. central board of secondary education, ajmer, air 1957 raj 206, ena ghosh v. state of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 08 1946 (PC)

Vithaldas Thakordas and Company Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax Bombay.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1947Bom302; [1946]14ITR822(Bom)

..... the purposes of earning their profits and was a permissible deduction. sir john beaumont frankly confessed that in the past he had wrongly understood the principle of the pondicherry case ; but the subsequent decisions had made the position clear. he observes that the question whether the payment of part of a commission to a third person ..... particular observation applied to the facts found in that case; and lord maugham in the indian radio and cable communications companys case expressly stated that it was not universally true to say that a payment, the making of which was conditional on profits being earned, could not properly be described as an expenditure incurred for the ..... our judgment the sum paid to bai tarabai is an item of revenue expenditure and admissible for deduction under section 10(2)(xii) of the income-tax act. accordingly the first question referred to us must be answered in the negative and the second question in the affirmative.the commissioner must pay the costs throughout .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 23 2005 (HC)

Muthulakshmi, W/O. Arumugham Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Rep. by Chief S ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2005(5)CTC650; (2005)3MLJ421

..... the 12th defendant, the plaintiff has no legal right to set aside the judicial order dated 13.01.1989 and 06.04.1992 passed by the second additional district judge, pondicherry in l.a.o.p. no. 109 of 1997. 6. the plaintiff has raised strong objection to the petition contending that it is not obligatory on the part ..... an extent of 6 hectares 11 acres 32 cents situated in pillaichavady and kalapet villages in oulgaret commune were acquired by the government for the purpose of establishment of central university phase iv under award no. 1/87 dated 25.03.1987. an amount of rs. 2,56,990/0- was awarded as compensation for the lands acquired by ..... deposited in civil court under section 31(2) of the land acquisition act. reference was made under section 30 of the land acquisition act for deciding rightful ownership and appointment of the compensation amount. in l.a.o.p. no. 109 of 1987, learned second additional district judge, pondicherry held that respondents 4 to 7 and 11 to 17 are the rightful .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 14 1996 (HC)

Balambal Vs. Kannammal Alias Pazhaniammal (Died) and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1997)1MLJ181

..... the whereabouts or the information as to existence of ramalingam was not known. taking advantage of the extension of the provisions of the hindu succession act and evidence act to the union territory of pondicherry, the plaintiff has filed the suit in question for a declaration of the civil death of the plaintiff's only son and consequential declaration that ..... 1. the above second appeal has been filed by the second defendant in o.s. no. 70 of 1977 on the file of the i additional subordinate judge, pondicherry.2. the second defendant appellant is indisputably the daughter of late sambasiva pathar through his first wife angammal, who was said to have died in 1931. thereafter sambasiva ..... have been occasioned also by the fact that the college in which he was studying in b.a. history ii year did not send upramalingam for university examinations to be held in mareh, 1964 due to his poor academic performance and that having regard to the provisions contained in section 34 of the specific relief .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 10 1998 (HC)

Dr. T.M. Paul Vs. City Hospital (Pvt.) Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : [1999]97CompCas216(Ker)

..... shareholders on september 19, 1992, at neelima hall in edacochin. the plaintiffs did not attend the meeting. according to the plaintiffs, the second plaintiff was away in pondicherry and did not get notice of the meeting. the first plaintiff had already fixed up an operation at about the time of the meeting, and, hence, she ..... he had to attend a meeting of examiners. he was at that time working as the director of the school of indian legal thought in the mahatma gandhi university at kottayam. the first plaintiff as p.w. 3 has also stated so. according to the first plaintiff, the second defendant did not tell them anything about ..... co-operative societies, etc. but, no authoritative pronouncement of the supreme court on the question of jurisdiction of civil courts in matters pertaining to companies coming under the companies act has been cited. learned counsel for the appellants have placed reliance on the decision in sri ramdas motor transport ltd. v. tadi adhinarayana reddy : [1997]3scr1160 . .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 20 1970 (HC)

Panipat Woollen and General Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income- ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [1970]78ITR142(P& H)

..... meaning of section 10(2)(xv).9. before the tribunal the department's case was that the instant case fell within the rule laid down by the privy council in pondicherry railway co. ltd. v. commissioner of income-tax, a.i.r. 1931 p.c. 165, whereas the case of the assessee was that it really fell within the ambit ..... the surrounding circumstances so as to arrive at a decision as to what was the real nature of the transaction from the commercial point of view. no single test of universal application can be discovered for a solution of the question. the name which the parties may give to the transaction which is the source of the receipt and the ..... . they were arrived at on an agreed basis. the deductions to be taken into account to arrive at profits were not those which were contemplated either by the income-tax act or by a prudent commercial practice or normal commercial method of accountancy. it is, in our opinion, this distinction which tilts the case in favour of the assessee.20. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //