Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh
..... chandrasekarans case, complainants daughter got admission in b. pharma course and paid fees and donation but it was found that the institute was not affiliated with the pondicherry university and the affiliation had become inoperative when the students were asked to join the course. consequently, it was held that the request of the complainant for refund ..... refund of tuition fee. the authorities in dr. alexander education foundation and another v. b. chandra sekaran, i (1995) cpj 141=1 (1995) cpc (58-62) pondicherry; the principal, maharishi veds vigyan mahavidyala women college v. p. sankar rao, 1 (1995) cpc (57-58) andhra pradesh, are not applicable to the facts of ..... in homeopathic medical college and hospital, chandigarh v. miss. gunita virk, i (1996) cpj 37 (nc), that the fora constituted under the consumer protection act have no jurisdiction to declare any rule in the prospectus of any institution as unconscionable or illegal and it is for the civil court to determine this issue. .....
Tag this Judgment!