Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pondicherry university act 1985 section 24 other authorities of the university Court: kerala Page 1 of about 2 results (0.127 seconds)

Dr. T.M. Paul Vs. City Hospital (Pvt.) Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : [1999]97CompCas216(Ker)

..... shareholders on september 19, 1992, at neelima hall in edacochin. the plaintiffs did not attend the meeting. according to the plaintiffs, the second plaintiff was away in pondicherry and did not get notice of the meeting. the first plaintiff had already fixed up an operation at about the time of the meeting, and, hence, she ..... he had to attend a meeting of examiners. he was at that time working as the director of the school of indian legal thought in the mahatma gandhi university at kottayam. the first plaintiff as p.w. 3 has also stated so. according to the first plaintiff, the second defendant did not tell them anything about ..... co-operative societies, etc. but, no authoritative pronouncement of the supreme court on the question of jurisdiction of civil courts in matters pertaining to companies coming under the companies act has been cited. learned counsel for the appellants have placed reliance on the decision in sri ramdas motor transport ltd. v. tadi adhinarayana reddy : [1997]3scr1160 . .....

Gwalior Rayons Silk Mfg. (Wvg.) Co. Ltd., Mavoor and anr. Vs. Governme ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1979Ker56

..... advanced was that the state had not acquired title and only the controller had. this was rejected by the supreme court after an elaborate examination. again, in the kerala university act case, that is, state of kerala v. very and rev. mother provincial (air 1970 sc 2079), the court observed :'18. the remaining provisions of this section ..... if it does so provide it is a law relating to compulsory acquisition or requisition. the principle in dwarkadas's case (air 1954 sc 119) and the kerala university act case in state of kerala v. very rev. mother provincial (air 1970 sc 2079). supports the conclusion as to compulsory acquisition and requisition. under clause (3), ..... there can be no doubt that if no writ could issue to the appellate authority at the time the order was passed, no writ could issue now after pondicherry has become part of the territory of india, for that would be giving retrospective operation to the constitution for this purpose which obviously cannot be done: (see jangardan .....

Dr.P.Prasad Vs. the Central University of Kerala,

Court : Kerala

..... of 2012, who is referred to as the 1st rank holder.4. the petitioner, an assistant professor in english working in a government college under the university of pondicherry, had been selected by the union public service commission and had been continuing thereon from 12.07.2004 onwards. exhibit p1 was the offer of appointment ..... professor. exhibit r2(b) is the update format submitted by the petitioner and produced by the university.12. the regulations of 2010 are made under section 26 of the university grants commission act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as "the ugc act"). the last date for applying in accordance with exhibitp3, as indicated therein, was 02.07.2010 ..... section (1) also makes it mandatory that for such regulations to have effect, it should be notified in the official gazette. in the context of the act conferring powers on the ugc to make any regulation retrospective and such power having not been exercised; the regulations would not be applicable to the selections which .....

Commissioner of Income-tax, Kerala Vs. Travancore Sugars and Chemicals ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : [1969]71ITR385(Ker)

..... the partners in the proportion laid down in the partnership agreement, making up what is described as a unit of 14 annas.'the observations of lord macmillan in pondicherry railway company case were considered in british sugar . v. harris (inspector of taxes). in that case, a company carrying on a manufacturing business agreed with ..... principles. in the privy council case of indian radio & cable communications co ltd. v. commissioner of income-tax, lord maugham said :'.... it is not universally true to say that a payment the making of which is conditional on profits being earned cannot properly be described as an expenditure incurred f or the purpose ..... statutory profits. the latter are statutorily fixed for a sepcified purpose.'in poona electric supply companys case computation of the profits was regulated by the electricity (supply) act, whereas in the case in hand it is regulated by the contract between the company and the government. in computing the real profits of the assessee here .....

Commissioner of Income-tax, Kerala, Ernakulam Vs. Travancore Sugars an ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1969Ker196

..... profits are earned by the assessee and then a percentage of it paid over by the assessee to the government. reliance was placed on the observations of lord macmillan in pondicherry railway co. ltd. v. commissioner of income-tax, madras, 0043/1931 , to support the contention. in that case, the assessee-company, incorporated in the united ..... principles.in the privy council case of indian radio and cable communications co. ltd. v. commissioner of income-tax, bombay lord maugham said:'it is not universally true to say that a payment the making of which is conditional on profits being earned cannot properly be described as an expenditure incurred for the purpose of ..... the payment was a revenue expenditure wholly and exclusively incurred for the purpose of the business and was an admissible deduction under section 10(2)(xv) of the income-tax act.12. in poona electric supply co. ltd. v. commissioner of income-tax, bombay, : [1965]57itr521(sc) the company carried on the business of distribution of .....

M.A. Andrews Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1984Ker101

..... maintains them, it has prima facie the power to regular, admission in its own institutions. counsel for the petitioner pointed out to us no provision from the university acts which deprives the government of the power of making rules for admission in its own colleges. that being so, it cannot be said that the government has ..... the government in exercise of powers conferred on it by the kerala university act. 1969 (act 9 of 1969). according to the learned counsel, chapter xlii of the 1972 statutes continues in force even after the repeal of the kerala university act 1969 by the kerala university act 1974 and a selection in violation of the first statutes of 1972 ..... be done it also for the government to consider. we are told that such entrance examinations are prevalent in at least three or four states, like bihar, pondicherry and andhra pradesh, and also in the vellore medical college. whether the candidates seeking admission can seek admission for all the specialised subjects or only for one .....

In Re: Temples in the Erstwhile Malabar Area

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1995Ker172

..... the scheme.(viii) the scheme shall also take into account those mosques which are small or arein the rural area or are such as mentioned inthe affidavit of pondicherry board and haveno source of income and find out ways andmeans to raise its income.(ix) the exercise should be completed and the scheme be enforced within six ..... the ooralans, the expenditure of the temples were being met.65. the agricultural lands held by these temples were mostly outstanding on tenancy.the kerala land reforms act, act 1 of 1964 which came into force on 1-4-1964 conferred fixity of tenure on the tenants and enabled the tenants to pay the fair rent as ..... called in question by the denomination either by proceedings before the statutory authorities constituted under the madras hindu religious endowments act or before the civil court by institution of suits as provided for in the said act. in narayanan namboodiri's case (air 1985 kerala 160) (supra) the full bench held sections 3 and 4 of the guruvayoor devaswom .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Pulikkal Medical Foundation Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : [1994]210ITR299(Ker)

..... the importance of the questions raised, i venture to add a few words of my own.49. before the commencement of the finance act, 1970 (19 of 1970), universities and other educational institutions existing solely for educational purposes and not for purposes of profit were enjoying complete exemption from tax on their incomes ..... ltd. v. collector of central excise, : 1990(47)elt491(sc) ; cit v. south arcot dist. co-operative marketing society ltd. : [1989]176itr117(sc) ; cit v. pondicherry co-operative, housing society ltd. : [1991]188itr671(mad) ; meenachil rubber marketingand processing co-operative society ltd. v. cit [ : [1992]193itr108(ker) and cit v. gwalior rayon ..... in respectful agreement with the reasoning in the judgments in birla vidhya vihar trust v. cit : [1982]136itr445(cal) and cit v. bimetal bearings ltd, : [1985]152itr85(mad) , that even in case some of the objects are not purely charitable, if the main object is charitable, even then the institution is a charitable institution .....