Court : Guwahati
..... the new rules. reference may be made to the decision of the apex court in union of india through the govt. of pondicherry and anr. v. v. ramakrishnan and ors. reported in : air2005sc4295 .19. it is fairly well settled principles of ..... a construction which attributes redundancy to the legislature will not be accepted except for compelling reasons.15. the apex court in bhavnagar university v. palitana sugar mill (p) ltd. and ors. : air2003sc511 held that it is the basic principle of construction ..... in terms of the definition. the apex court in union of india and anr. v. tulsiram patel etc. reported in : (1985)iillj206sc had discussed 'the maxim- 'espressum facit cessare taciturn' while interpreting a statute and held that it is in the nature ..... not permitted what is not do indirectly. if there is a constitutional provision inhibiting the constitutional authority from doing an act, such provisions cannot be allowed to be defeated by adoption of any subterfuge that would be clearly a fraud on .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Guwahati
..... of the length of the service.44. in : (1997)1scc350 , p. ravindran and ors. v. union territory of pondicherry and ors., the supreme court held that regularisation of ad-hoc appointees by passing the process of recruitment through open competition ..... upon : (1997)illj576sc central welfare board and ors. v. ms anjali bepari and ors. and : (2001)illj710sc gujarat agricultural university v. rathod labhu bechar and ors.. to strengthen the cause while placing reliance on the judgment of the supreme court in state of ..... gammon india ltd. v. union of india (1947) 1 scc 596; b.h.e.l. worker's assn. v. union of india (1985) 1 scc 630; mathura refinery mazdoor sangh v. indian oil corporation ltd. : [1991]1scr468 , and dena nath v. national fertilisers ltd. ..... is over and the work-charge employee became surplus and was retrenched after being paid compensation under industrial disputes act and the direction of high court to consider such retrenched employee as permanent employee was said to be erroneous, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Guwahati
..... of a draft proposed circular in connection with the payments of interest on the amount deposited as a precondition for hearing of the appeal under the central excise tarrif act, 1985 cannot also be applied in the present case. the order of the bombay high court directing refund in suvidhe ltd. : 1996(82)elt177(bom) being relating ..... gujarat insecticides ltd. v. union of india : 2005(183)elt9(guj) . relying on the decision of the apex court in b. shama rao v. union territory of pondicherry : [1967]2scr650 , mr. ganesh has submitted that when the charging section is no longer in existence and void, all other actions taken under the said provision also automatically ..... according to the learned aag, the decision in kalyani stores case : [1966]1scr865 having been held to be the law limited to the facts of that case and having no universal application, in state of kerala v. a.b. abdul kadir reported in : [1970]1scr700 and in state of karnataka v. hansa corporation (in short, 'hansa corporation'), .....
Tag this Judgment!