Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pondicherry university act 1985 section 18 other officers Page 91 of about 86,634 results (0.392 seconds)

Feb 09 2005 (HC)

Ravi Shankar Srivastava Vs. State of Raj. and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2005(3)Raj1736; 2005(2)WLC612

..... by petitioner while he was member revenue board, ajmer on judicial side. the petitioner was in these circumstances covered on account of provisions of judges protection act 1985 which provides for additional protection to judges to the effect that no criminal proceedings can be instituted or continued against a judge for anything done or ..... an employee of the central government, the approval from central government to conduct enquiry or investigation is necessary.58. so far as section 3 of judge (protection) act, 1985 is concerned, mr. rafiq submits that sub-section (2) of section 3 gives right that nothing in sub-section (1) shall debar or affect in ..... member of any governing body, professor, reader, lecturer or any other teacher or employee, by whatever designation called, of any university and any person whose services have been availed of by a university or any other public authority in connection with holding or conducting examinations;(xii) any person who is an office-bearer or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 02 1993 (HC)

Nawadah Vidhi Maha Vidhyalaya, Nawadah and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ...

Court : Patna

..... cases held that direction to allow students of unrecognised institution to sit in the examination would be in clear transgression of the provisions of the university act and regulations of the university and a direction to allow the students of such institution for taking up the examination shall be destructive of the rule of law. 8. ..... mu-03/92/cs(l) in exercise of the powers conferred upon him under s. 39(2)(ii) of the bihar-state universities act 76 as amended up to date, the chencellor, magadh university, has been pleased to approve the following transitory regulation and order that it may be published in the official gazette and brought into immediate ..... is not constituted.' 24. the above said proviso was kept alive through the process of repromulgation of the ordinances till the enactment of the bihar state universities (amendment) act, 1990 (act 3 of 1990) which came into force on 30th january, 1990. the legislature did not approve the retention of the above noticed provision on the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 17 2005 (HC)

The Management, Indian Institute of Horticultural Research (icar) Vs. ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2005(3)KarLJ134

..... rightly thought it fit not to traverse beyond the points of dispute referred to it, particularly, when its jurisdiction has been preserved by section 28(b) of the administrative tribunals act, 1985. the question of fact, which is not raised before the tribunal, cannot be allowed to be raised in these writ proceedings. hence the first contention of the petitioner fails ..... refused to permit the first party to do ph.d by a memo dated 12-8-1993 and denied the opportunity to apply and join the lecture post in the university of mysore by a note dated 21-2-1994. it also extended the period of probation of the i party by a memo dated 10-1-1995. the ..... establishment of the petitioner can be adjudicated before the central administrative tribunal. but in view of the express provision made under section 28(b) of the administrative tribunals act, 1985, the jurisdiction of the industrial tribunal/labor courts is saved. in pursuance to the saved provision under section 28(b) of the administrative tribunals .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 06 2001 (HC)

Shiva Shankara S. Vs. Karnataka State Bar Council, Bangalore and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2002Kant108; ILR2002KAR623; 2002(3)KarLJ557

..... . the petitioners in these petitions claim that they have successfully completed the five years ll.b. course in the university law college, bangalore (for short ulc) the university law college, bangalore is run by the bangalore university which is established under the karnataka state universities act, 1976.2. the petitioners applied to the karnataka state bar council for enrolment. the enrolment committee of the karnataka ..... by the bar council of india. the term college and affiliation are not defined either in the act or the rules. section 53 of the karnataka state universities act, 1976 relates to affiliation of colleges and provides that colleges within the university area may be affiliated to the university as 'affiliated colleges' on satisfying the conditions specified in the said section. the term 'affiliation' of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 06 2006 (HC)

G. Narasimha Murthy Vs. District Collector and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2006(3)ALD370; 2006(3)ALT433

..... any of the writ petitions, we are of the view that the petitioners should approach the andhra pradesh state administrative tribunal established under the administrative tribunals act, 1985 for redressal of their grievances : when the petitioners have an effective alternative remedy, we are not inclined to adjudicate the individual merits of any case. ..... , discriminatory, unreasonable, irrational or unconstitutional. the learned counsel also had drawn the attention of this court to the different provisions of the administrative tribunals act, 1985, the rule making power and the competency in relation thereto and also would maintain that a particular rule cannot be held to be invalid on comparison ..... administrative enquiry may have more far reaching effect than a decision in a quasi-judicial enquiry. as observed by this court in suresh koshy george v. university of kerala civil appeal no. 990 of 1968, dated 15-7-1968 : [1969]1scr317 the rules of natural justice are not embodied rules. what .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 30 2004 (HC)

The Director, Intermediate Education, Government of A.P. Vs. Rama Prab ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2004(4)ALT41

..... any jurisdiction to pass any interim orders or further orders on proceedings initiated for contempt, the power of contempt as conferred under section 17 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985, as pointed out above, is on par with the same power as conferred under the high court not only under the article 215 of constitution of india, ..... thus cannot be made applicable.17. in t.sudhakar prasad's case (9 supra), directly considering the provisions of section 17 & 30 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985 and by taking into consideration the principles laid down in l.chandra kumar's case (8 supra), supreme court held that it cannot be said in view of ..... binding and operative decree or order wherein merges the decree or order passed by the court, tribunal or the authority below. however, the doctrine is not of universal or unlimited application. the nature of jurisdiction exercised by the superior forum and the content or subject matter of challenge laid or which could have been laid shall .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 27 2001 (HC)

Dr. A.R. Sircar and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2002(1)AWC323A; (2002)1UPLBEC615

..... departments of king george's medical college, lucknow (hereinafter referred as 'the medical college') which is a constituent college of lucknow university as defined in section 2 (6) of u. p. state universities act, 1973. statutes 12.01 iii of the first statutes of lucknow university mentions the medical college as a constituent college. the medical college is also a faculty of the lucknow ..... university.2. the grievance of the petitioners' is that they are being subjected to hostile discrimination in the matter relating to post-retiral .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 17 2007 (SC)

Tejshree Ghag Etc. Etc. Vs. Prakash Parashuram Patil and ors. Etc. Etc ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2007SC2141; 2007(5)ALLMR(SC)900; 2007(5)BomCR199; 2007(8)SCALE165; (2007)6SCC220; 2007AIRSCW3673

..... college, it does not follow that the post of principal must be treated as equivalent to that of a reader for purposes of section 10(14) of the bihar state universities act, 1976, as amended.17. the orders of transfer impugned before the tribunal in any event could not have been passed without complying with the principles of natural justice.18. we ..... teaching and non-teaching staff. (iv) the principal of a constituent college is also the ex officio member of the academic council of the university. (v) he has the right to act as center superintendent in the university examinations. it is thus evident that the high court was right in holding that the post of reader could not be regarded as an equivalent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 19 2000 (HC)

israil @ Israr Pahelvan Nazirahmed Shaikh Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 2001CriLJ2209; (2001)1GLR306

..... ahmedabad, in exercise of his powers conferred upon him under section 3(2) of the gujarat prevention of anti-social activities act, 1985 (gujarat act no. 16 of 1985) (same will be referred to hereinafter as 'the act' for sake of brevity and convenience).2. the petitioner has challenged the said order of detention on the grounds that it -( ..... order of detention being made in present order of detention.72.2 practically, for each and every contention taken by shri prajapati, shri bhatt has taken a universal stoke dispute that petitioner has not pleaded this fact in the writ petition, and therefore, the detaining authority is not supposed to explain that point in ..... before the sessions judge, lucknow. that fact was also mentioned that bail application was moved much before an order of detention which was passed on 28-11-1985. these relevant and vital materials were not produced before the detaining authority for his consideration before passing of the order of detention. in the first instance, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 2012 (HC)

The Rasipuram Cooperative Urban Bank Ltd. Vs. the Deputy Registrar of ...

Court : Chennai

..... notification issued by the central government that csir was amenable to the jurisdiction of the central administrative tribunal in terms of section 14(2) of the administrative tribunals act, 1985. it was on the aforementioned premises, this court opined that sabhajit tewary4 did not lay down the correct law. this court reiterated the following six tests ..... also held that right to information is definitely a fundamental right. in coming to this conclusion, this court traced the origin of the said right from the universal declaration of human rights, 1948 and also article 19 of the international covenant on civil and political rights, which was ratified by india in 1978. this court ..... also found a similar enunciation of principle in the declaration of european convention for the protection of human rights (1950) and found that the spirit of the universal declaration of 1948 is echoed in article 19(1)(a) of the constitution. (see paras 45, 46 & 47 at page 495 of the report)16. the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //