Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pondicherry university act 1985 section 18 other officers Court: chennai Page 15 of about 4,536 results (0.365 seconds)

S.A.S. HussaIn Vs. Collector of Kanyakumari District and Others

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1997Mad318

..... particulars of practice. i have also to submit that inside my clinic i have displayed copy of the registration issued by the said council dated 20th august, 1985. i also submit that homoeopathy system of medicine is very well advanced, using of stethoscope is very much needed and syringe and injection needle are also essential ..... in 'c' class and thereafter i also passed in the examination conducted by the tamil nadu homoeopathy council (authority constituted under section 3 of the above said act) during december, 1975 and i have been conferred with the status of registered medical practitioner as per the certificate issued by the above council under certification no ..... . 13010 dated 20th august, 1985 at madras. i submit that as per section 15 and 26of the homoeopathy act, 1971, i am entitled to practise homoeopathy system of medicines in the state of tamil nadu, i submit that the .....

Thanthi Trust Vs. Wealth-tax Officer

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1989)78CTR(Mad)54; [1989]178ITR1(Mad)

..... the assessment year 1977-78, the trust filed a 'nil' return under protest because it was visited with a notice under section 14(2) of the act on september 3, 1977. on march 13, 1985, the trust received a 'nil' demand notice for the assessment year 1980-81. for the assessment year 1979-80, no proceedings were initiated. 53. as regards ..... charitable trust and is, therefore, not liable to assessment in respect of its assets under section 5(1) of the wealth-tax act. (ii) in so far as by orders dated november 30, 1982, and march 15, 1985, the respondent himself had held that the appellant is not assessable to wealth-tax, the revenue is now estopped from proceeding to assess ..... point was raised only in the reply affidavit. in any event, having regard to the terms of section 42c of the wealth-tax act, the defect in the impugned notice is curable. the decision in coimbatore club v. wto 1985] 153 itr 172 , is a clear authority for the proposition. again, in the case of a club which is a society .....

income-tax Officer Vs. Sakthi Finance Ltd. and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2001]247ITR593(Mad)

..... , he was accommodated. the second accused has stated in the statement exhibit p-5 that a circular was issued on april 6, 1985, to all the officers of the company regarding the mode of taking or accepting deposits. the second accused, as d.w. 1 ..... understand as to how he is liable to answer the claim of the complainant for the receipt of amount in cash in the year 1985-86. it is, thus, seen that on the date of receipt of the cash from the depositors noted in table no. 2, ..... , learned senior counsel for the respondent, thiru m. ravindran, contended that in cases of omission, section 6 of the general clauses act will not apply, since there is no saving clause in the amended provision and that the penal provision is omitted without any condition ..... initiated in the year 1985 when section 276dd was in force. new section 271d came into force with effect from april 1, 1989. therefore, the court has held that the petitioners will not be liable to pay penalty under section 271d of the act, since it was .....

First Leasing Company of India Ltd. and Others Vs. Additional Registra ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1997]89CompCas635(Mad)

..... to the decision rendered by s.a. kader j. in assistant registrar of companies v. narayanaswamy [1985] 57 comp cas 787, wherein the learned judge, while construing section 58a(3) and (5)(a) of the companies act, stated that acceptance of deposits by a company in excess of limits prescribed by the reserve bank and ..... on behalf of the petitioners. 3. contention no. 1 : contravention of the provisions of the act, was within the knowledge of authorities concerned, during inspections made in may, 1988, and december, 1988. contraventions have occurred on november 30, 1985, november 30, 1986, and november 30, 1987. this offence, if committed, is punishable only with ..... fine which may extend to rs. 500. the companies act not having prescribed any specific period of limitation, the provisions of the code of criminal .....

The Executive Officer, Kadathur Town Panchayat Vs. V. Swaminathan,

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2004(3)CTC270; (2004)2MLJ708

..... law lexicon as 'ground set apart on which the house of village may be built'. similarly, natham land is described in tamil lexicon published under the authority of university of madras to the effect that it is a residential portion of a village; or portion of a village inhabited by the non-brahmins; or land reserved as ..... by the apex court in its decision rendered in c.v. subbaya vs . p. anjayya reported in : [1972]3scr172 , while referring to section 3(b) of the madras act xxvi of 1948, it is held therein that the communal lands, porambokes, other ryotwari lands, waste lands, forests, mines and minerals, quarries, rivers and streams tanks and irrigation ..... maintenance of the roads and for other objects of public utility. as regards irrigation channels, rivers and tanks, the beds, would ordinarily remain vested in the government under act vii of 1865.7. we draw inference for the above view from the decision by the division bench of this court in papala narayanaswamy naidu vs. the secretary .....

R.Balasubramanian Vs. the Presiding Officer and anr.

Court : Chennai

..... steps in aid of execution from time to time as required by art.182 of the limitation act; so that the test of one year or six months' limitation prescribed by the payment of wages act cannot be treated as a uniform and universal test in respect of all kinds of execution claims. it seems to us that where the ..... by the first respondent-labour court in the impugned orders, and pass appropriate orders to reap the benefits of the provisions of section 33-c(2) of the id act, by letting in additional/fresh oral and documentary evidence, apart from considering the oral and documentary evidence let in already, and by following the procedures contemplated under law, ..... (employers) within a period of three years from the date when the wages become due, without going through the provisions of section 33-c(2) of the id act. 3. in these writ petitions, the petitioners challenge the impugned orders passed by the first respondent-labour court on the ground that there is no period of limitation while .....

M.P. Palani and Twenty Three Others Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Repres ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1999(3)CTC133; (1999)3MLJ265

..... therewith a copy of the award.'the division bench decision makes it clear that whenever the collector sends notice of his award under section 12(2) of the land acquisition act, 1894 has to enclose copy of the award. further, j. kanakaraj, j., had an occasion to consider similar request in k.a. sulaiman v. the government of tamil ..... ,000 per cent. it is also seen that there is no proof regarding service of copy of the award passed by the third respondent. section 18 of the land acquisition act, 1894 deals with reference to the court. it runs as, follows:'18. reference to court- (1) any person interested who has not accepted the award may, by written ..... court reported in ramalakshmi ammal, t.a.k.m. v. the revenue divisional officer, 1985 w.l.r. 504. the division bench after considering section 12(2) and 18(2) of the land acquisition act, 1894 has observed thus:'5. under section 18(2) of the act, the claimant should intimate the land acquisition officer about his request for reference to court .....

N. Doraisamy and Others Vs. Archana Enterprises

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1999]97CompCas129(Mad)

..... an accused. under sub-section (1) thereof, 'corporation' is defined as an incorporated company or other body corporate and includes a society registered under the societies registration act, 1860 (act 21 of 1860). 33. chapter xxxvi of the code, under the caption 'limitation for taking cognizance of certain offences', containing sections 467 to 473, has been inserted ..... in my opinion, cannot be regarded as laying down the correct proposition of law, in the light of the supreme court's decision in sheoratan agarwal's case : [1985]1scr719 . both the points are thus answered. 13. better it is, i feel, before delving deep into consideration of point no. 3, on its face value, to ..... court rendered by a bench consisting of o. chinnappa reddy j. and d. p. madon j. in sheoratan agarwal v. state of madhya pradesh : [1985]1scr719 . the point considered there was, whether the prosecution against the managing director and production manager of a company for an offence under the essential commodities .....

N. Varadarajan (Co-operative Sub-registrar) Special Officer Salem Co-o ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2001)3MLJ582

..... to abuse or misuse the so-called delegated power which we have shown earlier.19. the other rulings relied upon by mr.selvaraju are the marathwada university v. seshrao balwant rao chavan, and abhay shridhar ambulkar v. s.v.bhave, are not appposite. he also relied on the decision reported in mahe ..... for creating such authorisation. the order in writing authorising such officer would certainly provide an inbuilt check against the registrar or any suchother empowered officer from acting arbitrarily. therefore, it cannot be said that the state government in issuing the impugned government order and empowering various other officers thereunder had granted unbridled ..... to clothe its officers with the powers of the registrar, no guidelines have been provided and thus a handle is given to the state government to act 'arbitrarily' in an unreasonable manner and, therefore, sec.3 itself suffered a stigma of constitutional invalidity. the learned counsel are obviously making the unconstitutionality .....

M/S. Ram Mohan and Co Rep. by Its Proprietrix R. Renuka and Another Vs ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1999(3)CTC40; (1999)3MLJ423

..... possession to the knowledge of the land-owner. the machineries were not in working condition and they were removed and given for repair even in the year 1985 and this fact was known to the land owner. the suit premises were maintained by the appellants to the best of their ability and they have been ..... lessor cannot be heard to contend as though the lease continued to be a composite one and hence the provisions of the tamil nadu buildings (lease and rent control) act would apply. in support of his submission learned counsel refers to the judgment of the supreme court reported in bhawanji lakhamshi v. himatlal jamnadas dani. : [1972]2scr890 ..... allegation that the lease was composite was false, the appellants further submitted that they were entitledto the protection of the tamil nadu buildings (lease and rent control) act. the allegations pertaining to purchase of machinery were also denied by the appellants. it was further contended that defendants 4 to 15 were sub-tenants who were lawfully .....