Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pondicherry university act 1985 section 15 deans of schools Sorted by: old Court: kerala Page 1 of about 28 results (0.174 seconds)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Kerala Vs. Travancore Sugars and Chemicals ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : [1969]71ITR385(Ker)

..... the partners in the proportion laid down in the partnership agreement, making up what is described as a unit of 14 annas.'the observations of lord macmillan in pondicherry railway company case were considered in british sugar . v. harris (inspector of taxes). in that case, a company carrying on a manufacturing business agreed with ..... principles. in the privy council case of indian radio & cable communications co ltd. v. commissioner of income-tax, lord maugham said :'.... it is not universally true to say that a payment the making of which is conditional on profits being earned cannot properly be described as an expenditure incurred f or the purpose ..... statutory profits. the latter are statutorily fixed for a sepcified purpose.'in poona electric supply companys case computation of the profits was regulated by the electricity (supply) act, whereas in the case in hand it is regulated by the contract between the company and the government. in computing the real profits of the assessee here .....

M.A. Andrews Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1984Ker101

..... maintains them, it has prima facie the power to regular, admission in its own institutions. counsel for the petitioner pointed out to us no provision from the university acts which deprives the government of the power of making rules for admission in its own colleges. that being so, it cannot be said that the government has ..... the government in exercise of powers conferred on it by the kerala university act. 1969 (act 9 of 1969). according to the learned counsel, chapter xlii of the 1972 statutes continues in force even after the repeal of the kerala university act 1969 by the kerala university act 1974 and a selection in violation of the first statutes of 1972 ..... be done it also for the government to consider. we are told that such entrance examinations are prevalent in at least three or four states, like bihar, pondicherry and andhra pradesh, and also in the vellore medical college. whether the candidates seeking admission can seek admission for all the specialised subjects or only for one .....

Dr. T.M. Paul Vs. City Hospital (Pvt.) Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : [1999]97CompCas216(Ker)

..... shareholders on september 19, 1992, at neelima hall in edacochin. the plaintiffs did not attend the meeting. according to the plaintiffs, the second plaintiff was away in pondicherry and did not get notice of the meeting. the first plaintiff had already fixed up an operation at about the time of the meeting, and, hence, she ..... he had to attend a meeting of examiners. he was at that time working as the director of the school of indian legal thought in the mahatma gandhi university at kottayam. the first plaintiff as p.w. 3 has also stated so. according to the first plaintiff, the second defendant did not tell them anything about ..... co-operative societies, etc. but, no authoritative pronouncement of the supreme court on the question of jurisdiction of civil courts in matters pertaining to companies coming under the companies act has been cited. learned counsel for the appellants have placed reliance on the decision in sri ramdas motor transport ltd. v. tadi adhinarayana reddy : [1997]3scr1160 . .....

Dr.P.Prasad Vs. the Central University of Kerala,

Court : Kerala

..... of 2012, who is referred to as the 1st rank holder.4. the petitioner, an assistant professor in english working in a government college under the university of pondicherry, had been selected by the union public service commission and had been continuing thereon from 12.07.2004 onwards. exhibit p1 was the offer of appointment ..... professor. exhibit r2(b) is the update format submitted by the petitioner and produced by the university.12. the regulations of 2010 are made under section 26 of the university grants commission act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as "the ugc act"). the last date for applying in accordance with exhibitp3, as indicated therein, was 02.07.2010 ..... section (1) also makes it mandatory that for such regulations to have effect, it should be notified in the official gazette. in the context of the act conferring powers on the ugc to make any regulation retrospective and such power having not been exercised; the regulations would not be applicable to the selections which .....

M. James Thomas and Ors. Vs. the Hon'ble the Chief Justice represented ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1977Ker166; (1978)IILLJ226Ker

..... he placed reliance on the decision of the supreme court in b. shama rao v. union territory of pondicherry (air 1967 sc 1480). in that well-known case. it was ruled that the provision in the act passed by the union territory of pondicherry making applicable not only the sales-tax law in force in the madras state at that time, but also ..... i, division ii, category 8, which is as follows : division and categorypostgeneral and educational qualificationsspecial qualifications. 1.2.3.4.*** **category 8 assistant grade i a decree of a university inthe indian union in arts or science or commerce or a degree of any other universitywhich is recognised as an equivalent degree by the kerala ..... university. 1. secretariat manual test.2.account test (lower). 3. judicial test or civil judl. test & crl. judl. test or a law degree. exemption: those who have completed ten years .....

P.V. Mani and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1986Ker86

..... of 1981 would cover exts. p2 and p3 which were not legally in force on the date of promulgation of the amending act. the decisions which we have to notice in this regard are shama rao v. union territory of pondicherry : [1967]2scr650 , and akar v. attorney general of sierra leone (1969) 3 all er 384. in the former, ..... decisions reported in b. m. lakhani v. malkapur municipality, : air1970sc1002 . a. v. nachane v. union of india : (1982)illj110sc and prabodh verma v. state of u. p. : [1985]1scr216 , in support of this submission. the decision of the supreme court reported in nawabkhan v. state of gujarat : 1974crilj1054 , seems to us to provide a complete answer to the ..... in which alteration in conditions of service relating to wages and other incidental benefits was specifically pleaded was filed in 1982, and we are hearing the original petition in 1985, after the matter was fully heard by a division bench. in paragraph 22 of the original petition which was filed as early as in 1979, it was .....

Raman and anr. Vs. Francis and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 1988CriLJ1359

..... of crimes and its impact. rand prison survey indicated that deterrence has its impact on the crime situation. american violence and public policy (lynn a curtis yale university 1985), also noticed the increase in violent crime rate in the last 15 years and highlights the need to react to crime, to control it. attorney general's ..... dispensation can invite ridicule.6. even countries which had experimented with soft sentencing norms are beating a retreat. 'dangerous offenders - the exclusive target of justice' (harward university, 1984) notices the spurt of crimes in america and need for deterrence. it is said that one half of the people in metropolitan areas are afraid to go ..... jack gibbs in 'crime punishment and deterrence' stated:any legal theory of behaviour must assume that people by and large do not want to be punished and will act so as to avoid fines, jail, whipping or electric chair. that means a threat of real punishment will deterevil of punishment must exceed the advantage of the .....

Kerala Flour Mills, Mattancherry, CochIn Vs. the Board of Revenue (Civ ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1990Ker14

..... equalisation charge, and credited to government. such price equalisation charges will become payable to government in the case of sugar moved from factories in madras, mysore and pondicherry.'it is thus clear that that was a case in which the licensee was only entitled to the actual cost which he incurred for the transport of sugar and ..... bokaro roller flour mills private ltd. v. union of india, air 1986 punj and har 182; between haryana roller flour mills pyt. ltd. v. union of india, air 1985 delhi 312; between delhi flour mills co. ltd. v. commr. of food and supplies, delhi and an unreported decision of the madras high court in writ petition no. ..... (hereinafter referred to as 'the flour mills order'), which has been issued by the central government in exercise of the powers conferred by section 3 of the essential commodities act 1955. the petitioner has also obtained a licence under the kerala food grains dealers (licensing) order 1967 issued under sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 3 .....

M. Muraleedharan Nair Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1991Ker25

..... time when the law was made by signs, the most natural and probable, says blackstone in his commentaries on the laws of england (facsimile of 1st edn. of 1765, university of chicago press, 1979 vol. 1 page 59). and these signs are either the words, the context, the subject matter, the effects and consequence, or the spirit and ..... the effects and consequence, or the spirit and reason of the law. (underlined by the court). (see commentaries on the laws of england (facsimile of 1st edition of 1765, university of chicago press, 1979) vol.i.p.59). mukherjea, j. as the learned chief justice then was, in popatlal shah v. state of madras 1955 scr 677, air 1953 ..... : (air 1985 sc 697), to show that literal construction should be preferred and that ordinary meaning should be given to the words in the statute and that the court should not add to the statute if the meaning is clear. these are wellknown canons of construction and we need not dwell on that elaborately.14. the act functioned smoothly until .....

The Manager, Corporate Educational Agency, Diocese of Palai and Etc. E ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1990Ker356

..... mother provincial v. state of kerala, 1969 ker lt 749 : (air 1970 ker 196). the bench was considering the validity of various provisions of the kerala university act, 1969. section 53 of the act imposed certain fetters on the management in the matter of selection and appointment of principals in colleges, which were alleged to be violative of the rights of the ..... an inroad cannot be saved as a regulation which the state might impose for furthering the standards of education.31. sivaraman nair, j. has in the two decisions in joseph, 1985 ker lt 946 and fr. francis, (1988) 2 ker lt 403 : (1989 lab ic 589) proceeded on the basis that rule 44 is regulatory. the learned judge has chosen ..... in a position to depart therefrom at this distance of time.35. in the light of the above discussion, we hold that the decisions in joseph v. state of kerala, 1985 ker lt 946 and fr. francis v. district educational officer, (1988) 2 ker lt 403 : (1989 lab ic 589), in so far as they hold that managements of .....